Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
ARMOR RATING DOESN'T EVEN DO ANYTHING
You going to sit here and defend the company for a full release not even early access title that released without ARMOR RATING even working?
Were they transparent on why ARMOR RATING DOES NOTHING?
Stop white knighting you all make me sick
This game was obviously rushed, and they obviously went cheap choosing gameguard instead of easyanticheat, and cheap choosing their server hosts - who cannot even meet the Demand for the game.
If this was backed by Amazon or Microsoft instead of Sony, there'd be NO issues hosting.
ARMOR RATING DOESN'T EVEN DO ANYTHING
You going to sit here and defend the company for a full release not even early access title that released without ARMOR RATING even working?
Were they transparent on why ARMOR RATING DOES NOTHING?
Stop white knighting you all make me sick
This game was obviously rushed, and they obviously went cheap choosing gameguard instead of easyanticheat, and cheap choosing their server hosts - who cannot even meet the Demand for the game.
If this was backed by Amazon or Microsoft instead of Sony, there'd be NO issues hosting.