38
已評論
產品
0
帳戶內
產品

Clocks Coyote 最近的評論

< 1  2  3  4 >
目前顯示第 11-20 項,共 38 項
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 15.8 小時
Its ok.
張貼於 2023 年 2 月 5 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 24.2 小時 (評論時已進行 8.9 小時)
Fun game with friends
張貼於 2022 年 12 月 27 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 0.1 小時
搶先體驗版評論
This game is not what you would think based on youtube. Apparently it used to be but the recent addition of EAC has all but made the game unplayable, and, in some cases made it actually unplayable. Modded games by long time users resulted in bans and removed content would likley take years to be recreated.

Find an alternative.
張貼於 2022 年 9 月 9 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 246.7 小時 (評論時已進行 179.5 小時)
搶先體驗版評論
This is a good game that is getting better all the time. I have no idea why its still in alpha though as its more than playable without bugs. My only issue is the ability of zombies to burrow through solid rock or reinforced structure or, even tunnel through massive amounts of earth to get to you. This could be solved by adding NPC Human raiders with explosives or the like who actually could attempt to breach the hard fortifications while zombies would pose a threat to light (wooden) structures or during outings and travel.
張貼於 2021 年 1 月 9 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 549.0 小時 (評論時已進行 77.8 小時)
Its just a good game.
張貼於 2020 年 8 月 17 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
3 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
2 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 120.1 小時 (評論時已進行 15.2 小時)
搶先體驗版評論
I am hopefully optimistic about this one. Overall its got a lot of work needing to be done and i hope they dump the sea truck. It has the bad qualities of both old subs (slow and clunky but also small and weak) with the good of neither.

The world is in heavy development and as of this moment i am underwhelmed at what’s deep. There is such a heavy emphasis on the twisty tentacles, which seemed like a good idea in concept, but gets old really quick because it defies logic and starts to feel like Dr. Suess made it.

The predators are less scary but some places just don’t fit. It has a lot of work to do to get where it needs but good points also exist. Base upgrades are actually very well done and it uses much of the cut content from the first game. Some of which is good while others should have stayed dead.

Hopeful but they need to cut the sea truck and revamp the system. A procedural world would be better as that’s why its hard to play the first game. Once you know the map there’s no point in playing.

1. Add back the seamorth and Cyclops
2. Procedural generation
3. multiplayer
張貼於 2020 年 5 月 17 日。 最後編輯於 2020 年 6 月 16 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 4.1 小時 (評論時已進行 1.7 小時)
This game is revolutionary and its sequal is a masterpiece. This one however gets boring pretty quick due to only a few small maps that are all the same and no way to make more or even more interesting maps.
張貼於 2020 年 5 月 3 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 146.3 小時 (評論時已進行 46.6 小時)
This game is amazing! AT first i was unsure what to do as the learning curve is a bit steep but very worth it.
張貼於 2020 年 4 月 23 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
2 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 69.2 小時 (評論時已進行 2.8 小時)
搶先體驗版評論
I am editing this because they ended up adding everything that i had hoped for in my previous one! This game is amazing and unique. I recomend it for any type of gamer who likes FPS or RTS games. I would like to see a more scary alien faction and the ability to rebuild bases if you evacuate but even without those additions this game gets one of only 2 10/10's i have given to any game.
張貼於 2020 年 4 月 15 日。 最後編輯於 2021 年 1 月 9 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 31.9 小時 (評論時已進行 26.8 小時)
搶先體驗版評論
Very fun.
張貼於 2020 年 3 月 2 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
< 1  2  3  4 >
目前顯示第 11-20 項,共 38 項