Install Steam
sign in
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem

Illinois, United States



I wrote that review when I was angry and only had like 8 hours on it. I came back to it later, but I stand by my belief that it really is unacceptable to not have autosave, or to not at least warn about a lack of autosave, in any major game these days. As a once recovering save scummer I've put a lot of effort into training myself to ignore the ability to save manually, so as to avoid the temptation, and Subnautica is the only game I've played in like the last decade to have punished me for it. So I'm keeping the review up as a warning.
>calls it a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ game and not worth playing
>has 42 hours on it
>disables comments on review
stop being a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ muppet abd accept criticism of your retarded claims