Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
Achievements are added by the game's developer, so you will need to ask the developer of the game to add such achievements to their games.
Valve/Steam does not make that decision, nor do they have any authorization to edit a games code, that they do not own.
In some cases it might be very easy to add achievements to a game, for others it might be quite difficult. Honestly though, I wouldn't ever count on it.
And personally, I never really cared if a game had achievements or not. Especially given the backlog of games I have, in most cases I'm just happy to finish the game and would prefer to move on to something else instead of endlessly grinding away at it over some achievements. If it's one's that wouldn't be hard to get, that's one thing. But some are just not worth the time I could otherwise be spending moving on with other things.
and btw. you require access to the games code to implement Steam achievements.
I suppose I could have commented how your statement is totally not true, considering that Fallout 3 (which is pretty much on the verge of a retro game) does not have any Steam achievements (nor cards I might add).
Is it possible that you may believe all games have achievements because the "stats" links in your games list make it look that way?
Anyway, if you don't enjoy different opinions then maybe... not post in a public discussions forum? Weird idea, I know...
In truth, achievements shouldn't be a deciding factor when buying a game. If it's a good game you want to play, buy it and play it.
Ghilda, will reverse engineer anything.
Have you ever tried to look through reverse-engineered code, change it and recompile it?
There are lots of decompilers for C++, C#, Java, ... available. That doesn't mean anyone is going to bother with it. Even less so for games that sell for less than a fiver and rarely.
If the increase in sales isn't enough to justify the cost of adding them (as that can end up being huge), no company is going to waste more time and resources on the matter.
I think some very vocal achievement hunters vastly overestimate how important achievements are to most Steam users. They're a fun bonus and can be enjoyable to collect if not too grindy or insanely difficult to get. But I don't think most people are all that troubled about whether they can 100% most/all the games they own.
On PSN trophy forum someone bothered to find the numbers. Based on console sales and people who signed up on a tracking website with at least one gold trophy (usually for completing the game) ... They came out at something in the area of 0.1 % or less. And that's still not people actually bothering with it.
It's easy to overestimate one's importance if you socialize with a group of like-minded.
I mean, most people are perfectly happy buying the yearly iterations of FIFA and CoD and/or spend their money in microtransactions like in CS:GO.
Then you need to ask the game's developer. Posting this here will not get anyone to add achievements to older games.
There is also the cost involved in adding the achievements. Why would they add them to an old game that does not sell much these days? Would they even be able to make enough to cover the cost of adding the achievements?