Eurogamer says = performanced BAD.

[karmazyn1]

THEY DO NOT RECOMMEND.
I am scared as I was going to buy it in March as I enjoyed Wilds but they simply telling you that it is not worth it due to the bad performance. Game tries to force frame gen on you, even on low end machines where frame gen is not recommended.
I am flabagastered.......resident evil 2 run really well

[Akemua]

The article you're referring to is actually from Digital Foundry. The people that are known specifically for stress testing games.

Either way, it's not great but I can play it even with my mediocre setup.

also, Resident Evil 2 is like 5+ years older and the engine was built specifically for it. It's why so many people are mad they're using that engine for these big open games. It's not designed for it at all.

[NashDash]

Go play RE2 then.

[karmazyn1]

Diposting pertama kali oleh NashDash:

Go play RE2 then.

I will bro. However I also wanted to buy this. Why are you so mean?

[Lunacy]

As far as I've seen, performance is amazing. Constant 60 even with the most packed action going on.

[Tazor]

I mean... I loved the og STALKER trilogy. But STALKER 2 is an absolute dumpster fire. The questionable design choices, Unreal Engine 5, poor performance, lack of proper mod support, lack of A-life simulation one of STALKER's biggest features.

I haven't bought STALKER 2. I don't think I will ever buy STALKER 2.

If you like a game in a franchise you don't have to buy all of them. Just stop. Go play something else.

[Lightest]

5700X3d 4080S 32gb ram 3600mhz im pretty sure im high end and this game is taxing on PC i have to play with RT off and had settings scaled down to med to high with some things on low like fur and some small stuff. im pretty much hovering around 60s with dips to high 50s not seeing spike anymore gladly.. recommended wanted to maxed me out but the spikes and crashes is unbearable. high res pac recommend 16gbs that just crashes after a while. it not instant but stange behaivor you might beat a monster our two than you might crash and monster or 2 and have to reset. if you get this game its MAD fun and im HOOK but be prepare to play with settings!

[Gill]

So here is the simple long and short of it: Unless you have a very new, top of the line PC (And lets face it, most people don't) you're not going to hit a smooth 60FPS in this game without resorting to DLSS or your manufacturer's equivalent and Frame Gen regardless of your quality settings. And regardless of this, a lot of the texture work is just straight up ugly PS3 era style graphics. (The monsters however look amazing)

Without these a high to mid spec PC will be getting around 20-40 in most areas. With DLSS alone you can expect 40-50 in those same areas. With Frame Gen on you can get 60 to 75 in those same areas on that same hardware.

This game relies HEAVILY on DLSS + Frame Gen if your card can do it, if not, AMD's offering + Frame Gen. This will get you the FPS you need but visuals will look like absolute dog water as soon as it starts moving. Don't get me wrong, when you're playing and fighting you won't notice it too much unless the monster has a lot going on visually. But the moment you stop and look, you'll see it. I'm not exactly sure HOW the performance is this bad without resorting to fake frames and your graphics card being forced to hallucinate, but here we are.

You'll especially notice the mid-PS3 era dithering which... Well I'm shocked they went for that option.