Graphics are worst than Worlds???

[Maine Man]

What happened? Does this game look so bad???

[Kiririn]

Originally posted by LegionXNX:

Originally posted by Gigantoad:

You sure like to yap a lot without saying much. What people are criticizing here (and by the way even Gamespot listed this a negative in their review) is that the visual fidelity does not justify the bad performance. That is all, and you comparing it to indie graphics or what people may say about indie graphics (meaning art style 99% of the time) has absolutely no relevance here.

As usual with you people you take an argument and twist it into your own narrative to make a "gotcha moment", Never once I tried comparing it I said that if you think a 2d retro game is good because "combat fun graphics dont matter" but bash to hell a game that not even release yet but indie devs have this similar issue with their beta runs.

That is not keeping the same energy. your just hate bias

We tried warning you. Now that the reviews are out we can tell you, "told ya"

[Gigantoad]

Originally posted by nowhere man:

Yeah the graphics are really worse than World. It's crazy how they manage to screw up this big.

They're not worse at all. I think what people see that makes them say something like that is that Worlds looks clean and sharp while Wilds looks washed out and blurry. But looking past that you should see a massive visual upgrade in pretty much all regards. Lighting, models, characters, animation etc. are all way ahead of Worlds.

[GamingWithSilvertail]

Originally posted by Kiririn:

Originally posted by LegionXNX:

As usual with you people you take an argument and twist it into your own narrative to make a "gotcha moment", Never once I tried comparing it I said that if you think a 2d retro game is good because "combat fun graphics dont matter" but bash to hell a game that not even release yet but indie devs have this similar issue with their beta runs.

That is not keeping the same energy. your just hate bias

We tried warning you. Now that the reviews are out we can tell you, "told ya"

we dont care about a troll like you 'warning' us because we are gonna have something you wont have and that is fun :#

[LegionXNX]

Originally posted by Kiririn:

Originally posted by LegionXNX:

As usual with you people you take an argument and twist it into your own narrative to make a "gotcha moment", Never once I tried comparing it I said that if you think a 2d retro game is good because "combat fun graphics dont matter" but bash to hell a game that not even release yet but indie devs have this similar issue with their beta runs.

That is not keeping the same energy. your just hate bias

We tried warning you. Now that the reviews are out we can tell you, "told ya"

you never warned anyone quit yapping you just bashed the game like this clown did.

Originally posted by Dae:

Originally posted by Gigantoad:

You sure like to yap a lot without saying much. What people are criticizing here (and by the way even Gamespot listed this a negative in their review) is that the visual fidelity does not justify the bad performance. That is all, and you comparing it to indie graphics or what people may say about indie graphics (meaning art style 99% of the time) has absolutely no relevance here.

Last cause on that one, he still thinks the game is going to vastly change on day 1.

of course NPC nobody joins the forum, has nothing of value to say, says something completely false. glad your on my block list

[Kiririn]

Originally posted by LegionXNX:

Originally posted by Kiririn:

We tried warning you. Now that the reviews are out we can tell you, "told ya"

you never warned anyone quick yapping you just bashed the game like this clown did.

https://steamcommunity.com/app/2246340/discussions/0/720115848603298245/?ctp=7#c720116202450479729

[LegionXNX]

Originally posted by Kiririn:

Originally posted by LegionXNX:

you never warned anyone quick yapping you just bashed the game like this clown did.

https://steamcommunity.com/app/2246340/discussions/0/720115848603298245/?ctp=7#c720116202450479729

that is not a warning that is just you yapping as usual, once again like what silver said,

NO ONES cares that a trolling is warning us, also I wanted to edit this in cause I found this funny right after you posted that you got caught speaking false information.

[Dae]

Originally posted by LegionXNX:

Originally posted by Dae:

Last cause on that one, he still thinks the game is going to vastly change on day 1.

of course NPC nobody joins the forum, has nothing of value to say, says something completely false. glad your on my block list

And yet, you're still responding to me, at least, you were. Unfortunate about that title, wonder what happened?

"DD2 was handled by a different Capcom team, so Wilds will be better!" or "The beta and benchmark isn't representative of the game (turns out its potentially worse according to the journos, lmao), it'll be better on launch!"

[Shadowlet]

It's smeared, all brown and yellow with no colors. World's visual clarity and vibrance were a lot better. There's no point in a "graphical upgrade" if the game can't even render it sharp.

[JPM岩]

Originally posted by Shadowlet:

It's smeared, all brown and yellow with no colors. World's visual clarity and vibrance were a lot better. There's no point in a "graphical upgrade" if the game can't even render it sharp.

"Smeared" "all brown" and "yellow" describe most of World, and deserts, which was what the beta for Wilds had. Or did you miss out of the lush rainforest, or the icey caves, or the volcanic caverns they showed?

[Killance]

Benchmark showed me it has better graphics that world. This is a troll bait thread.

[ArashiE7753]

Yeahhhhh that's probably because of your own system because I ran some stuff with medium settings and it still looked beautiful. When the game actually releases I'm going to run High settings because my laptop can easily handle it, I recommend other people stop trying to run it on Ultra settings when you're using an IntelCore-i5 cause I can tell you that it's not gonna be fun for you.

[Sledge]

On a technical level, no, not at all. There are clear, obvious, notable improvements over Worlds.

Worlds simply looks that good seven years later, that the improvements just aren't as potent as going from 4U & GU to MH World was.

There's also the issue that, on lower settings where the fidelity isn't all that impressive, the performance hit based on the benchmark and beta was pretty weird.

But, no, Wilds when it's full guns blazing with the fidelity looks great. The most notable improvement I'd say really boils down to the character models.

[droaan]

Originally posted by Sledge:

On a technical level, no, not at all. There are clear, obvious, notable improvements over Worlds.

Worlds simply looks that good seven years later, that the improvements just aren't as potent as going from 4U & GU to MH World was.

There's also the issue that, on lower settings where the fidelity isn't all that impressive, the performance hit based on the benchmark and beta was pretty weird.

But, no, Wilds when it's full guns blazing with the fidelity looks great. The most notable improvement I'd say really boils down to the character models.

On the contrary, I think this game just looks bad because they're once again forcing RE engine to make open world games.

Compare Wilds to any number of open world games from the last 10 years. Games that do more are actually better looking by miles, and run better at that. This games optimization is an atrocity and makes Drag Dogma 2 look like a stellar launch.

[JPM岩]

Originally posted by droaan:

Originally posted by Sledge:

On a technical level, no, not at all. There are clear, obvious, notable improvements over Worlds.

Worlds simply looks that good seven years later, that the improvements just aren't as potent as going from 4U & GU to MH World was.

There's also the issue that, on lower settings where the fidelity isn't all that impressive, the performance hit based on the benchmark and beta was pretty weird.

But, no, Wilds when it's full guns blazing with the fidelity looks great. The most notable improvement I'd say really boils down to the character models.

On the contrary, I think this game just looks bad because they're once again forcing RE engine to make open world games.

Compare Wilds to any number of open world games from the last 10 years. Games that do more are actually better looking by miles, and run better at that. This games optimization is an atrocity and makes Drag Dogma 2 look like a stellar launch.

Oh here comes goalpost moving. We're now comparing Wilds to non-MonHun games.

[droaan]

Originally posted by JPM岩:

Originally posted by droaan:

On the contrary, I think this game just looks bad because they're once again forcing RE engine to make open world games.

Compare Wilds to any number of open world games from the last 10 years. Games that do more are actually better looking by miles, and run better at that. This games optimization is an atrocity and makes Drag Dogma 2 look like a stellar launch.

Oh here comes goalpost moving. We're now comparing Wilds to non-MonHun games.

I'm just comparing the open world on offer to any other game.
To me, Wilds looks bad and you can look at something like RDR2 from 2018, and it looks miles better and more detailed, and has more going on in a scene at any one time, and did it on a PS4...

What is it about any valid criticism that you are not going to be able to handle?
I'm a huge MH fan, but I'm also not a huge fan of Capcom lazily slapping upscaling and frame gen onto an engine not designed for open worlds, and once again forcing the engine to buckle under the weight of their misguided ambitions.