安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
DC BoS has nothing to do with the real BoS, and the Enclave was wiped out in Fallout 2. Other than that, what you said is pretty much correct.
Bethesda will, without a doubt, bring back some already dead faction in Fallout 4, with no (good) explanation.
The canon lore states that they split off from the main BoS because the Elder of the DC chapter cared more about the fate of the people surrounding DC than the original BoS mission. The Enclave was the main antagonist of Fallout 3, which originally ended with the possible destruction of John Henry Eden, the death of his right-hand man, and with the addition of Broken Steel, the potential destruction of the armored crawler that ended up being the last Enclave bastion in the Capital Wasteland. I say possible and potential because those are choices made that appear to be canon but aren't explicitly said as such.
I have played Fallout 3, I just can't take its lore butchery seriously. DC BoS is a BoS chapter of traitors to the cause, the Undead-Enclave doesn't make any sense at all and the situation in the Capital Wasteland is frankly, silly.
And you have to remember that because of the Enclave's ideals, they don't recruit "mutants", people who have been living in the Wasteland. That's why its nonsense that they're so dang strong in FO3. Enclave's power basically invalidates Fallout 2's ending completely, and that's what I considering butchering the lore.
The other stuff, like how the CW is still all irradiated and people aren't even trying to achieve self-sustainability is not exactly consistent with the previous games, but that can be accounted to Bethesda's style of world creation.
Considering that its over 200 years since the Great War, even the stupidest wastelanders would have some sort of agriculture and means to survive. But nope, in FO3, people live off the scarce brahmin and Old World food. Silly.
On the Tactics bit, I have to admit, I've never actually played it for more than 10 minutes, so I'm not very familiar with it. Also, sorry about this hideous wall of text. Feel free to say its gibberish, I'll revise it in the morning, after a good 10 hours of sleep.
Oh well, at least we have Wasteland 2 coming!
Remember, the Capital Wasteland didn't get people like the Vault Dweller or the Chosen One. Without people like them to go find GECKs and jumpstart the area, Megaton/Rivet City are about all you can hope for. Also, the wiki says (taking it with salt because wiki) that one of the remaining officers after the oil rig executed Operation GTMFO before what was left was teabagged to death by the BoS/NCR, which is a logical turn of events. It doesn't render the ending irrelevant, since it says "yeah, they got skull-borked, but some people managed to survive and escape elsewhere" instead. Tactics was set in Illinois, I believe...wiki confirms...and actually is more different in regards to the original than the DC BoS, considering they recruit anyone able to hold a gun and be trained by them, mutants/ghouls included. Also, kind of hard to grow crops when pure water is rare enough that the only things with a better weight/value ratio are weightless items and cigarettes.