67
已評論
產品
0
帳戶內
產品

merry trootmas 最近的評論

< 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 >
目前顯示第 1-10 項,共 67 項
33 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 0.0 小時
awful at launch, boring single entity monsters to save face, and as a ultimate consequence it dooms tzeentch factions since they won't really get another DLC with a real overhaul.
張貼於 5 月 14 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 0.3 小時 (評論時已進行 0.2 小時)
i love having to google for so much ♥♥♥♥ just to get controls to work! incredible piece of software
張貼於 4 月 22 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
2 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 12.1 小時 (評論時已進行 7.7 小時)
i don't get it
the game looks visually phenomenal, and the level of interaction with whatsits and whatnots is really high. And that's, like, that's it. The gameplay in this game is very eh - you can shoot, and you can walk. There's barely any weapons, there's barely any nuance to the actual gameplay, there's hacking minigames or something. It's fairly competent and average, as far as video games go. I don't think it really elevates the medium at all, or presents anything that I wouldn't want to miss. I guess other than being able to larp as a homeless person, which definitely never gets old, as I rummage through boxes and shelves to put more bottles of booze into my bucket that I carry around at all times.
張貼於 4 月 15 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 8.5 小時 (評論時已進行 2.6 小時)
with so much content, you're bound to have runs where the game is giving you practically nothing and you're stuck in the '♥♥♥♥ start, new run' loop - not because you're sub-optimal or not reaching peak efficiency in the first hand, but because you keep getting random planets for single pairs and high-card in the store and not a single joker, with the ante round being the wall. But when it happens over and over, it really makes me wish the game was designed more to be a game where you at least had the illusion that these kind of runs were still doable.
But when the stars align, you realise that it's because, well, the stars aligned. I feel nothing when numbers go big and mults go uncontrolled - I didn't do anything to achieve that, just got a run where the rolls weren't simply awful.
張貼於 3 月 29 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
11 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 44.3 小時 (評論時已進行 43.9 小時)
was there ever any ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ issue with the simple activity of playing video games without having additional account systems piled on top of it that come with their own stacks of errors and issues that you have to hope to god that one of the random solutions on the internet is going to solve them?
張貼於 3 月 24 日。 最後編輯於 3 月 24 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 0.2 小時
wtf
張貼於 3 月 8 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
2 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 0.0 小時
new mechanics and visuals, but since it's now magic nonsense, it's not really fun to figure things out since, well, it's magic nonsense
張貼於 2 月 23 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
6 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 56.7 小時 (評論時已進行 19.9 小時)
this peer2peer coop game NEEDS a severly underperforming auth server to protect the microtransactions and deny you from playing the game
thank u live service
張貼於 2 月 15 日。 最後編輯於 2 月 18 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 1.1 小時 (評論時已進行 1.0 小時)
this is the dark souls of cat puzzles
張貼於 2 月 12 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
7 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 16.6 小時 (評論時已進行 10.0 小時)
it's like an incredible indiana jones movie that's 20 hours long, but an absolutely terrible game with really basic gameplay that doesn't really allow you to do much with it - the actual 'game' parts feel like an afterthought so that it wouldn't be a fully animated movie. Open world parts are a slog compared to the more directed and scripted set pieces. The future of video 'games' truly is grim, thank you neil druckman
張貼於 2 月 11 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
< 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 >
目前顯示第 1-10 項,共 67 項