Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Good to know, I didn't notice it even tho I passed VH/VH nurgle :P (it was pain as no decent AP or Anti Large).
There is one more thing with spells that I found out tho. Didn't check if its listed yet anywhere or is it more of a bug or balance issue, but while I'm here.
in short: most spells seem right with descriptions: if it says increased AP dmg it is usually at 100% so it goes like 40>80 or something or some % increase from 33% to 40% AP and so.
One lore that does seem to have issue with it is Lore of Yang.
Wall of wind and fire upgraded > increased AP dmg, it's from 0 to 33% AP
Dragons breath upgraded > increased AP dmg, dmg is up double, but AP is still at 20%
Constellation of the dragon upgraded > increased AP dmg, dmg is up, AP still at 33%
So lore of Yang is only that is not consistent with it's descriptions compared to other new lores.
I'll be back once I test some more of your favourite ogres to see how stats compare now and killing potential since they had issues with vigor in vanilla.
Constellation of The Dragon = same thing.
Math :).
I understand the math, but if spell does let's say 50 dmg with 20% AP it's 40/10 split. Upgrading damage double with same split is gives it same split and I see that as "increased damage", not increased AP damage. Doing 100 dmg with 30% split to have a 70/30 instead of 80/20 would be "increased AP damage", IMHO as you are changing the multiplyer, not damage in linear fashion..
This is what I'm saying that in that case description is wrong.
All spells that have "increased AP damage" either do change the % or they are 100% AP so it doesn't matter. Spells that have "increased damage" either keep the multiplyer or just straight on double up.
Having the "increased AP dmg" on CoTD and DB spells in Yang lore in that case seems either: A) not streamlined with other spells descriptions; B) not adjusted multiplyers.
With what you described Venris seems to me that it's intended so it looks like it's A) Not streamlined with other spells.
And I'll be honest that I didn't go over the old spells books (like death, shadows and so), I've just focused on new lores, so I can't speak of SFO2> SFO3 consistency in that case :)
Although hes insanely weak in the autoresolve