Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The game runs at 60 updates per second, and the reactor sliders can change 5% per second, 4.1 * 60 makes 246 (out of 5000), or just short of that 5%. Rounding does not permit me to make it 4.166.. exactly, and using a number other than 5000 (2500 would be possible, but has worse rounding) would further increase component count for negligible benefit.
While the turbine slider setting can only change by 5% per second through circuitry, output can also be increased or decreased by temperature assuming the turbine setting requirement is met, and this has a limit of 1000 degrees per second instead, where 100% output can be reached with 5000 degrees.
Can you please clarify?
"thus drop with a maximum speed of 20% per second (vs 2% per second for vanilla, or 5% for turbine controlled designs) while maintaining the efficiency the 100% turbine controller sacrifices"
HOW does this controller somehow work "faster" at adjusting the temperature or output faster than any other reactor controller? I was under the impression that the change rates for Reactor Controllers was hard-coded by the devs to a certain cap in an attempt to neutralize the Bang-Bang controller.
Also, the two OR Components feel like an odd inclusion, as they are only receiving input from one wire, why not just make them signal checks? They would fulfill the same function. :/