52 people found this review helpful
3 people found this review funny
Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 6.1 hrs on record
Posted: Apr 22, 2023 @ 6:43pm
Updated: Apr 22, 2023 @ 6:44pm

BottomLine at the Top:
An excellent and engrossing P&C game with a lackluster ending.

Intro:
Cloak and Dagger Games and Wadjet Eye Games have made some of my fav modern P&C games. This title certainly has all their respective marks of quality and attention to detail.


Pros:
-Good use of quality-of-life features (double click fast travel exit, object highlight function, autosaves, color blind text option)
-Retro pixel style with up-to-date features makes for a nostalgic yet modern graphic experience (note to self: start writing wine reviews)
-Excellent cutscene animations with rotoscoped elements
-Professional Voice acting
-Atmospheric soundtrack and excellent use of ambient sound effects.
-Engrossing Pseudo-Lovecraftian story and gameplay
-Good game flow. Very few "what the hell am I supposed to do" moments.


Meh...:
-I liked the original title for this game, Incantamentum, better.
-I've said it before, and I'll say it again: I F****** HATE AGS SETUP!!! A BOX TO SELECT HOW I WANT TO PLAY MIDI MUSIC?!? WTF IS THIS, 1992?!?!?!?...... But I digress, this is an issue with AGS not this game.


Cons:
-The ending, Period. For a game that had such an engrossing story, I found the ending to be a shock and not in a good way.
-Related to the ending, there were several loose ends / unexplained events that never get a resolution. I find adding things like to this to an engrossing story only to not resolve them to be a faux pas.
-Overall game play time for me was around 6 hours including getting all achievements. This is about half of what I would have liked it to be. I think there was room in the setting to pack in an additional few hours of gameplay.


Final Thoughts:
I want to reiterate that I enjoyed this game and I think any P&C afficionado will feel the same. When I look at the list of pros and cons, it makes me think that this game might have suffered from a case of "Deadline-itis".

Let’s look at the facts from this point of view:

-Game has a title change seemingly late into development. This is not rare but is a strange sign.
-Several unresolved events in game that go nowhere and are never explained.
-Signs that there was potentially going to be more gameplay/features but did not get included (things like all the extra buildings you can knock on the door but no ones there for example).
-Gameplay should have been extended by at least 2-4 hours.
-And again, the ending.

People think that because these are retro pixel style games that they are cheap. They are not. They also think they should take less time than a more graphicly intensive game. They do not. I'll also point out that the development timeline for this game overlapped significantly with that little pandemic we went thru...

That being said I have no idea if I'm right or not. I also don't care. This was still a fun game and I recommend it to all my fellow P&C fans.




For more point & click goodness, check out our P&C fan Steam group, The Coalition of Point & Clickers!:



👑 Powered by HoI 4 Deu Curators group in German / English 👑⠀⠀⠀
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
6 Comments
WallsOfEryx Jul 10, 2023 @ 1:18pm 
You're on point about the ending. I saw where the plot was going and was expecting some sort of choice(s) that would change the ending, but nope. All I get is a slap on the face.
alyssa-black Apr 23, 2023 @ 11:45am 
Great write-up! I'm curious if I'm gonna like it, as I also enjoyed games from both companies...
Zeebrax the Astral Lifejacket Apr 23, 2023 @ 7:13am 
I felt the same way about this game -- the ending was sooo disappointing, or at least it should have been a goad to the player to work for another, better ending, which, of course, did not exist. I think that unresolved things can add a little spicy mystery if they are very peripheral to the plot, but certainly not if they are part of the central story. Yeah . . . the production values were so high all around that the lacks made themselves felt *that* much more strongly.
Dahl Apr 23, 2023 @ 4:15am 
Thanks for the review.
Zorro Apr 23, 2023 @ 12:41am 
Thank you
Quebec Dragon Apr 22, 2023 @ 9:37pm 
Excellent review. Thank you. :good: