13
已評論
產品
0
帳戶內
產品

Moosh 最近的評論

< 1  2 >
目前顯示第 1-10 項,共 13 項
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 1.2 小時
搶先體驗版評論
jonkie
張貼於 2023 年 11 月 27 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 490.8 小時 (評論時已進行 444.0 小時)
its not that good
張貼於 2023 年 3 月 26 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 1.6 小時
I straight up don't understand peoples hate of this game, like if it has a timing issue then calibrate it or you can just cope and if you cant play without the visual ques then cope if you are comparing it to another game and its not as good cope if its too short cope if its too expensive cope.

First off if it had bad timing then the devs would have fixed it and you are probably just bad, you can also just calibrate it bozo.

Second off, if you can't play without visual ques then it should've been readily apparent that the visual ques are not very pronounced and they are subtle and same thing with the audio ques, if you have a problem with that you can just look at the visual ques.

Third off, if this game isn't as good as NEKOPARA - Catboys Paradise then don't compare them, they have 2 different devs, 2 different teams entirely and most likely they had different thought processes in mind when developing the game.

Fourth off, if this game is too short maybe you shouldve looked at the discography and maybe thought that an indie game(i presume) isn't going to have more than 20 songs and if they did well food for you. Also if you watch the 'trailer' on steam it doesn't even have a good representation of how many songs are in the game so maybe use common sense and think "oh maybe this song doesn't have 80 songs"

Lastly, if this game WAS too expensive, then why did you buy it in the first place if you didn't want to pay the full price.

In conclusion, um i mean its a pretty cool game, very cutesy and probably made me a little more fruity um i mean i sped ran it so its not extremely long but it was absolutely worth my money. 8/10 on the zerk scale.
張貼於 2023 年 3 月 26 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 818.1 小時 (評論時已進行 216.6 小時)
6/10
張貼於 2023 年 3 月 20 日。 最後編輯於 2023 年 12 月 5 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
26 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
2 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 0.6 小時
搶先體驗版評論
⠀⠀⠀⡯⡯⡾⠝⠘⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢊⠘⡮⣣⠪⠢⡑⡌
⠀⠀⠀⠟⠝⠈⠀⠀⠀⠡⠀⠠⢈⠠⢐⢠⢂⢔⣐⢄⡂⢔⠀⡁⢉⠸⢨⢑⠕⡌
⠀⠀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠀⡀⢂⠡⠈⡔⣕⢮⣳⢯⣿⣻⣟⣯⣯⢷⣫⣆⡂⠀⠀⢐⠑⡌
⢀⠠⠐⠈⠀⢀⢂⠢⡂⠕⡁⣝⢮⣳⢽⡽⣾⣻⣿⣯⡯⣟⣞⢾⢜⢆⠀⡀⠀⠪
⣬⠂⠀⠀⢀⢂⢪⠨⢂⠥⣺⡪⣗⢗⣽⢽⡯⣿⣽⣷⢿⡽⡾⡽⣝⢎⠀⠀⠀⢡
⣿⠀⠀⠀⢂⠢⢂⢥⢱⡹⣪⢞⡵⣻⡪⡯⡯⣟⡾⣿⣻⡽⣯⡻⣪⠧⠑⠀⠁⢐
⣿⠀⠀⠀⠢⢑⠠⠑⠕⡝⡎⡗⡝⡎⣞⢽⡹⣕⢯⢻⠹⡹⢚⠝⡷⡽⡨⠀⠀⢔
⣿⡯⠀⢈⠈⢄⠂⠂⠐⠀⠌⠠⢑⠱⡱⡱⡑⢔⠁⠀⡀⠐⠐⠐⡡⡹⣪⠀⠀⢘
⣿⣽⠀⡀⡊⠀⠐⠨⠈⡁⠂⢈⠠⡱⡽⣷⡑⠁⠠⠑⠀⢉⢇⣤⢘⣪⢽⠀⢌⢎
⣿⢾⠀⢌⠌⠀⡁⠢⠂⠐⡀⠀⢀⢳⢽⣽⡺⣨⢄⣑⢉⢃⢭⡲⣕⡭⣹⠠⢐⢗
⣿⡗⠀⠢⠡⡱⡸⣔⢵⢱⢸⠈⠀⡪⣳⣳⢹⢜⡵⣱⢱⡱⣳⡹⣵⣻⢔⢅⢬⡷
⣷⡇⡂⠡⡑⢕⢕⠕⡑⠡⢂⢊⢐⢕⡝⡮⡧⡳⣝⢴⡐⣁⠃⡫⡒⣕⢏⡮⣷⡟
⣷⣻⣅⠑⢌⠢⠁⢐⠠⠑⡐⠐⠌⡪⠮⡫⠪⡪⡪⣺⢸⠰⠡⠠⠐⢱⠨⡪⡪⡰
⣯⢷⣟⣇⡂⡂⡌⡀⠀⠁⡂⠅⠂⠀⡑⡄⢇⠇⢝⡨⡠⡁⢐⠠⢀⢪⡐⡜⡪⡊
⣿⢽⡾⢹⡄⠕⡅⢇⠂⠑⣴⡬⣬⣬⣆⢮⣦⣷⣵⣷⡗⢃⢮⠱⡸⢰⢱⢸⢨⢌
⣯⢯⣟⠸⣳⡅⠜⠔⡌⡐⠈⠻⠟⣿⢿⣿⣿⠿⡻⣃⠢⣱⡳⡱⡩⢢⠣⡃⠢⠁
⡯⣟⣞⡇⡿⣽⡪⡘⡰⠨⢐⢀⠢⢢⢄⢤⣰⠼⡾⢕⢕⡵⣝⠎⢌⢪⠪⡘⡌⠀
⡯⣳⠯⠚⢊⠡⡂⢂⠨⠊⠔⡑⠬⡸⣘⢬⢪⣪⡺⡼⣕⢯⢞⢕⢝⠎⢻⢼⣀⠀
⠁⡂⠔⡁⡢⠣⢀⠢⠀⠅⠱⡐⡱⡘⡔⡕⡕⣲⡹⣎⡮⡏⡑⢜⢼⡱⢩⣗⣯⣟
⢀⢂⢑⠀⡂⡃⠅⠊⢄⢑⠠⠑⢕⢕⢝⢮⢺⢕⢟⢮⢊⢢⢱⢄⠃⣇⣞⢞⣞⢾
⢀⠢⡑⡀⢂⢊⠠⠁⡂⡐⠀⠅⡈⠪⠪⠪⠣⠫⠑⡁⢔⠕⣜⣜⢦⡰⡎⡯⡾⡽
(i also paid 99 cents for this game, im suing)
張貼於 2021 年 6 月 3 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 15.0 小時 (評論時已進行 11.9 小時)
One Of My Favorite Games This Year Right Next To Risk Of Rain 2. Getting My GOTY Nomination This Year
張貼於 2020 年 11 月 25 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
2 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 71.5 小時 (評論時已進行 68.2 小時)
yuo can maek san into obama
張貼於 2020 年 7 月 8 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 1,421.8 小時 (評論時已進行 639.9 小時)
Gode Gaem, Vary Foon
張貼於 2020 年 7 月 4 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 4.6 小時 (評論時已進行 3.8 小時)
fun, gonna train for a tourny
張貼於 2020 年 5 月 25 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 681.1 小時 (評論時已進行 100.3 小時)
CS:GO 評論
bruh
張貼於 2020 年 5 月 17 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
< 1  2 >
目前顯示第 1-10 項,共 13 項