I really wanted to like Drug Dealer Simulator 2. After the first game, I had high hopes—more depth, co-op mode, maybe some innovation in the gameplay. Instead, we got a clunky, buggy mess that feels more like an early prototype than a polished release. But what's worse? The devs seem more interested in accusing Schedule I of copying them than actually fixing their own game.

Let’s break this down:

UI? Newsflash—everyone’s using basic inventory grids and crafting trees. That’s not innovation, that’s standard UI design.

Mechanics? What exactly are you claiming as yours? Making drugs? Selling drugs? Managing operations? Those mechanics existed in Tycoon games, Breaking Bad, and crime sims long before your franchise.

Plot? The whole "start small and build a drug empire" trope isn’t exactly original. You didn’t invent it. Hell, half the drug movies and shows from the past 20 years have used that arc.

Now you're allegedly trying to throw legal shade at Schedule I—a game made by one guy that, frankly, plays better, looks better, and respects players' time more than this buggy sequel ever did. Maybe instead of pointing fingers, focus on polishing your game, fixing the janky controls, improving performance, and delivering something actually new.

Because right now, Drug Dealer Simulator 2 feels less like a sequel, and more like a case study in how not to evolve a franchise—and trying to take down competition just makes it look like you're scared of being outdone. And guess what? You already were.

Rating: 3/10