Εγκατάσταση Steam
Σύνδεση
|
Γλώσσα
简体中文 (Απλοποιημένα κινεζικά)
繁體中文 (Παραδοσιακά κινεζικά)
日本語 (Ιαπωνικά)
한국어 (Κορεατικά)
ไทย (Ταϊλανδικά)
Български (Βουλγαρικά)
Čeština (Τσεχικά)
Dansk (Δανικά)
Deutsch (Γερμανικά)
English (Αγγλικά)
Español – España (Ισπανικά – Ισπανία)
Español – Latinoamérica (Ισπανικά – Λατινική Αμερική)
Français (Γαλλικά)
Italiano (Ιταλικά)
Bahasa Indonesia (Ινδονησιακά)
Magyar (Ουγγρικά)
Nederlands (Ολλανδικά)
Norsk (Νορβηγικά)
Polski (Πολωνικά)
Português (Πορτογαλικά – Πορτογαλία)
Português – Brasil (Πορτογαλικά – Βραζιλία)
Română (Ρουμανικά)
Русский (Ρωσικά)
Suomi (Φινλανδικά)
Svenska (Σουηδικά)
Türkçe (Τουρκικά)
Tiếng Việt (Βιετναμικά)
Українська (Ουκρανικά)
Αναφορά προβλήματος μετάφρασης
Valve had years to get their crap together. this would not have happend if they went aggressively against 3rd party sites instead of their "hey bros, could you please not? ok? cya"-mentality.
i dont even know ... did Valve implement case item drop chances for everything yet, like it is required by chinese law or is this still just occasionally for some cases?
They have their own cases and drop chances in their version Perfect World CS:GO.
https://www.reddit.com/r/GlobalOffensive/comments/6zd9yx/perfect_world_csgo_has_finally_published_their/
We will follow the holy biddings of betting that have been passed down from the Elders and will bet one wealth (which amounts to EUR 0.10 ... long story ;) ).
We will meet up at Gamescom and ask people three simple questions:
(1) Do you think lootboxes are gambling.
(2) Do you think gambling in gaming should be regulated.
(3) Do you think it'S a good idea to ban unlawful games from sale.
And following the holy bidding of surveys that also have been passed down from the Elders, we will offer one piece of chocolate for the participants.
Thus are the ways The Truth shall be determined.
Politicians and developers. See just because its deemed gambling doesn't make it 'bad. Just means the publishers have to pay certain fees for the approriate right tom operate gambling games within the counmtry.'
Valve as a publisher considered this and said. 'Screw that noise. and ergo they have removed the ability to acquire those items from boxes or the market place. Which simply means there is game content that people in the Netherlands will no longer be able to acquire, unlike their british and american counterparts.
Seems fair. From trhe get go this seemed more like the government coming up witha pretense to wring some extra taxes out of game publishers that it was for the protection of the citizens. Of course since these are all cosmetic items you don't lose anything by not having them, except the niggling rage of seing someone with a sweet skin you now know you will never have.
One beacon of hope however could be that it may , as i suspect, be publisher choice., which means each publisher gets to make that decision . Heck Valve might change their tune, depending on how much of a tick they see in their revenue from the region.. Me thinks the question the developers are left with, 'is this region worth the extra money?'
And thats before dealing with the need to wait until gambling laws in that area even allow outside companies to get a licence in the first place.
Don't blame the parents, blame the kid that gambles.
They are strict laws around gambling, if trading skins was seen as gambling thought out europe and the USA then all players who want to trade skins would have too be 18 or 21 years old, have proof of ID, bank account and what ever else. It would be too much work for valve too keep track off. If underage kids did gamble, valve would face massive fines and/or jail time.
But this dutch law will soon pass on to other EU nations in due course...
i hope they start regulating and banning mircrotranactions in games here in the states.
On what legal basis would there be any regulation on micro transactions?
Within reason and when it comes to the internet there's not a lot that can reasonably be done. except have proof that the person entered the area under false pretext. I.e they lied .
How do you consider something a loss when the value of the items is entirely speculative? It is theoretically impossible to lose since you always win an item and the value of the item is subjective and speculation prone. How can you measure 'loss' in such terms. You really can't.
As for providing the odds. That's easily done but more apt to be harmful to the end users the government is supposedly trying to protect. The human mind does not process probability very well. It's why most games don't have true RNGs, they have doctored RNGs., because to most humans a true RNG looks 'rigged'.
Monitoring spending, well they provide the tools for self-monitoring. I will guarantee any spending limit Valve imposes will have some percentage of users crying foul.
They can create local offices easily enough. SO long as its under the name of a tax paying business in their jurisdiction then it's cool.