Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://www.reddit.com/r/avorion/comments/5q9ksl/analysis_on_material_efficiency/
If that was just a hypothetical, however, first try adding an Iron block and then transforming it into the same block but made out of Titanium. The '+/-'numbers on the side aren't always accurate - only when the change has been made will it be 100% certain about the new numbers. The idea that 'higher-tier = lighter' isn't always accurate, but in this case Titanium is supposed to be lighter and stronger than Iron, so the same block should show a lower mass and a higher HP than its Iron counterpart. If it isn't, something's gone wrong.
@M oh sorry,yes, hypothetical, not using any mods. So the +/- numbers are not always accurate,hmm ok this explains this then I guess but I m surprised it doesn't work as expected. But will try your suggestion to see.
As example, using an 5x5x5 block:
Iron hull : 500 hp, 6.38kt, -0.24m/s deacc. Iron armor: 3125 hp, 10.36kt, -0.4 deacc
Titan hull: 750 hp, 3.75kt, -0.14 deacc. Titan armor: 4688 hp, 6.25kt, -024 deacc
Naonite hull: 1125 hp, 4.13kt, -0.16 deacc. No armor
Trinium hull: 1687 hp, 2.63kt, -0.1 deacc. Trinium armor: 10547 hp, 4.38kt, -0.17 deacc.