Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Steel core? Where did you read that? That would make no sense, the PIAT launched a HEAT warhead.
Actually in real life the PIAT was not that terrible, it was better then the early-mid war Bazooka variants in almost all aspects. It could penetrate 100mm of armor and could hit a target with 60% probability at 90m in the hands of a trained user (longer range then the Panzerfaust). It also had no backblast unlike the Bazooka, Panzershrek and Panzerfaust and because of that it could be used in enclosed spaces like buildings, bunkers etc. It had no smoke or flashes so it did not give away the users position when fired unlike the launcher type weapons. It could also fire different types of round, mainly smoke and HE. It was overall smaller then the Bazooka and Panzershrek but not smaller then the Panzerfaust.
The main reason why the PIAT was so disliked by the soldiers using it was because it was so difficult to use, was very heavy for its size and could not be fired from the top down. And most of all reloading it was a slow and physically very hard process as that giant spring had to manually be compressed by the user.
A problem was also that the British enicially assign the PIAT to commanders to use as the saw fit, no dedicated infantry AT teams were trained. As a result the PIAT was often used by soldiers who had only basic training in the weapons operation and infantry AT combat.
.org is a joke and a piss poor one at that.
Stone launcher
It's actually rather funny that Reddit is seemingly the only forum that is worth a damn most of the time. Much less toxicity there.
I mean the only way you could kill something with it is if the guy is brain dead and thinks its too hard to run you over sitting still.
Maybe it does have a bit of infantry killing potential but then again all AT weapons have that, if you want to reduce it then apply the same target size nerf that you did to zooks and schreks.
Better than listening to your "L2Adapt" aka "OKW is fine" dribble on .org.
Pls..
Wonder where I said that.
I see you are
coh2.org duh.
I bet you're happy now that OKW overperforms yet again. All I saw from you pre OKW buffs was crying along with Alex. Now its all L2P and scant agreeance on any suggestion about OKW.
Once a fanboy always a fanboy...
Anyway problem with Piats as everyone says its accuracy
Especialy against panther
You can even fire over walls to kill hq trucks!
No show me where I said what, your imagination goes rampant. Following the patch release I immediately said popcap and Okw overbuff needs a hot fix.
Okw was in need of a rework since no competitive player could make the faction work in tourneys. That's an objective fact.
Funny everything that I say on the topic of buffing axis seems to stick forever in your memory, but everything I say concerning buffs on allied factions seems to be out of your mind.