Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
... it depends on licensing.
That is the whole reason behind that.
What do you mean "smaller trucks", 3 or 4 axle rigid trucks together with 3 or 4 axle trailers aren't small are they? They can carry just as many tonnes as a semi, no?
And licenses: so go and get them, how hard can it be? SCS must have good connections with the truck manufacturers already since they've been making digital models of their trucks for a decade or more already, and they've done a fine job, the trucks in the game are highly detailed and beautiful so why would it be difficult to get licenses for rigid trucks? It's more free promotion for them and SCS can make it into a rigid truck DLC and make more money themselves because the players will love it. It's a win win win for everybody.
And licencing costs time and money. SCS still has to pay for licences and if trucks will be added to the game, they will be free for everyone who bought the base game.
Fair enough, if these licenses are expensive I get it.
But your point about "reworking the whole economy" is a made up problem imo, you don't need multiple drop off points just because you think that's how it is in RL.
Why have rigids in the game if they do the exact same jobs as all the existing trucks?
If they don't do what they do IRL, it seems a bit superfluous to spend time and money creating them.
One other point: historically, all trucks in the game are free content for everyone, any level.
I don't know how sustainable it would be for SCS to release a new category of trucks from many manufacturers with full, expensive licenses and a new team of devs working on them, and still be free.
Anyone who feels they would like SCS to adopt rigid trucks in the future:
The location for suggestions is on the wishlist thread at the SCS Forums:
https://forum.scssoft.com
https://forum.scssoft.com/viewforum.php?f=185
This is the Steam player to player forum, NOT SCS, the actual game developers.
Sadly, nobody on here can "fix" anything in the game itself, we can only help and advise players.
These forums are NOT the official way to contact SCS, so any comment on here is unlikely to get any response from them.
I never said that I don't want it to be like in RL, I said 'you don't need multiple drop off points just because YOU THINK that's how it is in RL'. See the difference? I'm questioning your perception of reality, I'm not saying ETS2 shouldn't aspire to be as realistic as possible/feasible. Rigids and semis does the same job, they transport goods, multiple drop off points or not and when I see plenty of big rigid trucks with trailers on the roads in RL I think it's very reasonable to expect them to be implemented in the game, we like realism right?
But isn't that why this is called 'steam forum', so we can come in here and just blow off some steam?
Sadly, it is moving that way. Pointless suggestions, demands and threats are the order of the day. All a waste of time, this forum isn't SCS and they don't officially monitor it, carry on discussions here, or reply to any of the bright ideas that get posted continually.
I imagine they took one look at the posts and ... never came back.
Who can blame them?