Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
In my opinion, Scania and Volvo are equally good in terms of engine power.
But I prefer to drive the Volvo because of the side mirrors.
- Scania's side mirror block the more visibility to the sides than Volvo's when I have to see to the sides at intersections
The biggest difference between SCS ETS2 trucks is the ability to see past the mirrors and the quality (available info) of the digital dash display.
Scania driver stole in start many times.
Scania used 2016 transmissions, Volvo olders.
Volvo driver used adaptive power/normal mode auto transmission and it used 1500-2000rpm. Scania driver didn't used adaptive auto transmission and it allowed engine used 1000-1500rpm. SCS has limited Volvo engines to 2000rpm max and because SCS physics didn't change to 6th gear with gargo so Scania get by.
This only showed differencies how much SCS still got to work how game uses truck & driver settings.