Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
bahahaha! Even the dude on the video is clueless. He is just yapping away about CPU bottleneck and the cpu is comfortable at 50-57%. He switches the next game and its sitting comfortable at 17% yet still claiming its CPU struggle.
Hello! Its the not CPU. The Cpu is clearly chilling and having a good time. The GPU is failing to perform a function that is still kept secret by the Manufacturers of the GPU. Again, if you had some deep knowledge on rendering you would know this.
As i mentioned elsewhere, physics doesnt lie. The GPU is doing something wrong hence why speeding it up with frame generation is a GPU…….. A GPU solution.
case in point, trolling
goodbye, have a bad career
Stop expecting people to "just buy a 5080/5090". That's a lot of money, and most people can't easily afford that if at all. And on top of that those prices are clearly artificially inflated like crazy because of greed, and because of caveman gamers going "unga bunga just get better pc parts bruh!"
People are very justified in complaining about this game running like ass on anything less than an $2500 computer. At this rate consoles will really "win the war" by simply still being affordable to play games on.
If someone builds a car that runs on water, why are you still trying to use a better premium gas?
Odd isn't it?
Ive seen many new faces. However if truly want to compare comments, there one critical key you need to consider.
The happy crowd is using frame generation and are … happy.
The frustrated crowd is trying to Sherlock Holmes as to why CURRENT GPUs run poorly without frame generation. It being 2025, GPUs should be hitting 300 fps by now. I been hinting at the reason, no one wants to believe a guy who isnt in NASA.
Yeah Gpus were cheaper back then and im not gonna do the inflation argument. Im not defending anything here, but the price for producing wafers has gone up exponentially in the last 6 years, and all of the GPU manufacturers have no control over prices for those wafers, or even over the cost of lithography technology used to make them - they are so far down the supply chain. For example, the cost of a TSMC 10 nm wafer had a price of around $6,000 (GTX 10 was 16 nm, RTX 20 was 12 nm) vs the price of a 5 nm wafer which costs around $15000-17000 now (4N which is 40 and 50 series is based on this) and I do believe its artificial bc they have a monopoly. NVIDIA and AMD have no control over it - 3nm is expected to run around 20k. That said, an ignorant idiot is gonna say "Just upgrade bro" - I dont expect them to actually have been on PC for long at all. Theres a viable reason why a 5080 is the price what it is right now (It still sucks for what it costs) - the 50 series is still a paper launch being taken advantage of by everybody. The cost of PC gaming will force these ignorant and obnoxious people out the same way that the Fermi era did, and im all for it.
That said, this game is more CPU bound than anything and with how big MH is itll get years of support and they will continue to improve it over time
Your physics lesson is flawed, because you're failing to understand parallelization. The extra frame-generated frame does not rely on the CPU,meaning if you're getting 30FPS by a CPU botleneck, with frame gen off the GPU is getting data for 30 frames. With frame gen on, the CPU is still only sending 30 frames of data per second, but with frame gen the CPU is either interpolating or extrapolating an extra frame per frame, meaning you'll get 60FPS with half the CPU calls, which is the entire point. Frame gen taxes the GPU slightly more to produce a higher framerate, and has zero impact on the CPU, but it's ignoring the CPU to produce the frame.
I don't think you need sherlock holmes to see that a lot of people are not gonna expect lower mid range of GPUs to run all that on high settings at least. I say if you lower the graphics to a medium range or decrease shadow quality which is like the grim reaper of CPU and GPUs.
Definitely could help a lot
I am currently re-downloading the benchmark to test out more graphics and tweaks to improve my FPS regardless of it being 107.
Oh that's definitely one of the things going on here. Which is really weird, because I remember there used to be something called "occlusion culling" being a mere setting 20 years ago.