Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
Like not even NVIDIA employees can get there hands on those cards.
I mean yes im using frame gen but i run the game absolutely smooth as butter with no ghosting or noticable imput lag at around 100fps+ on my 4070 ti super and 5700x3d. 1440p ultrawide. Ultra settings, quality upscaling.
With frame gen lol.
Not fooling anyone.
lol the guy with top tier gaming hardware complains about elitism
60 fps is your target as listed, why are you expecting more? Sounds like 'just because'.
30fps without frame gen is "NORMAL FPS numbers" for a PS4 looking game on PC? That's what Capcom seems to think.
Yes.
"This means that neither Open Beta Test 1 or 2 are representative of the experience you’ll have when the game launches, so please don’t base your optimisation / performance expectations on those. Instead, please download and give the Monster Hunter Wilds Benchmark a spin and you’ll get a much more accurate and reliable insight into how your PC will run the game at launch."
https://store.steampowered.com/news/app/2246340?emclan=103582791474317056&emgid=547852302920187994
the choice of the wrong engine for a game
bad or not existing optimisation
adding cpu-&ram-hogging anti-tamper/copy protection
....
all "white knighting",
all trolling,
all (bought/paid) public relations
all (bought/paid) influencers
all defaming/bullying of critics
...
can not change that
if a game looks similar to or worse then even 7 year old (or even older) games on 9(+) years old hardware,
and even needs framegeneration and upscaling to get fhd 60fps
while said (in terms of visuals) competing older games on said older hardware have zero issues running fhd 60fps+
something is 100% wrong
if a game looks (by far) worse then (more or less) current games on (more or less) current hardware,
while needing framegeneration and upscaling to get fhd 60fps
while said current (competing) games do fhd 120fps+ on the same hardware without such "framefaking" and upscaling
something is 100%wrong
all "white knighting",
all trolling,
all (bought/paid) public relations
all (bought/paid) influencers
all defaming/bullying of critics
...
can not change that
can it run crysis?
can it run cities skylines 2?
can it run mh wilds?
ps using the latest rtx 5xxx series as a reference point might not be a smart idea
considering the minuscule performance gains compared to the rtx 4xxx series
where only the 5090 stand out a little(!)
but
all that mixed with (not really) pretty price premiums and power usage
nvidia managment and investors like that
reminds of what we had with new intel cpu generations,
until amd released the first gen ryzen
and
then for a lot of games and some applications even more intersting ryzen x3d cpu´s
Anyways, Intel Arcs have more VRAM for a smaller pricetag, i wont be buying any Nvidia card ever again.
With framegen on I was over 200 FPS
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
7900XTX
32GB DDR5