MH wilds optimization controversy

[LegionXNX]

I took an anecdotal observation on the people who were discussing the optimization issue and to no surprise that came across my face it was people running 3060s with old CPUs trying to go high-max settings in a giant open world expecting buttery smooth performance.

Just turn down your graphics to medium bro its not that much of a difference and cap your FPS, and before you came at me saying "wElL iTs NoT tHe NOrM" your hitting barley past minimum system requirements.

[Moonwitch]

Runs like garbage on high end systems lmao

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCqNugSRGBI

[LegionXNX]

Originally posted by Moonwitch:

Runs like garbage on high end systems lmao

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCqNugSRGBI

lmao thats a 3 month old video you realize that right? and i remember you trying to bait in last threads as well. blocked

[Moonwitch]

Originally posted by LegionXNX:

Originally posted by Moonwitch:

Runs like garbage on high end systems lmao

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCqNugSRGBI

lmao thats a 3 month old video you realize that right? and i remember you trying to bait in last threads as well. blocked

lmao still relevant because the beta is using the old build ya clown. Counter blocked, rip bozo. Couldn't handle the truth.

[BEEP!]

Originally posted by Moonwitch:

Originally posted by LegionXNX:

lmao thats a 3 month old video you realize that right? and i remember you trying to bait in last threads as well. blocked

lmao still relevant because the beta is using the old build ya clown. Counter blocked, rip bozo. Couldn't handle the truth.

Plus the benchmark is straight up the 1.0 version of the game so meaning what patches it doesn't have is like 2-3weeks now and not a whole lot can change in that time frame for gameing.

[LegionXNX]

Originally posted by 1080Puktra:

Originally posted by Moonwitch:

lmao still relevant because the beta is using the old build ya clown. Counter blocked, rip bozo. Couldn't handle the truth.

Plus the benchmark is straight up the 1.0 version of the game so meaning what patches it doesn't have is like 2-3weeks now and not a whole lot can change in that time frame for gameing.

Capcom literally said the benchmark is separate from the beta. research it

[BEEP!]

Originally posted by LegionXNX:

Originally posted by 1080Puktra:

Plus the benchmark is straight up the 1.0 version of the game so meaning what patches it doesn't have is like 2-3weeks now and not a whole lot can change in that time frame for gameing.

Capcom literally said the benchmark is separate from the beta. research it

No they did not they said the Beta was the same Beta while the benchmark is the closest thing to how the game will be at launch, you can literally see the game version dude.
Plus the benchmark has bugs that are fixed.

(And one last, important point to share with you before we wrap up this post. The Monster Hunter Wilds Benchmark does not guarantee the performance of your system for Monster Hunter Wilds, but does give you better insight and information, especially when compared to playing Open Betas 1 and 2.)

[Moonwitch]

Originally posted by 1080Puktra:

Originally posted by Moonwitch:

lmao still relevant because the beta is using the old build ya clown. Counter blocked, rip bozo. Couldn't handle the truth.

Plus the benchmark is straight up the 1.0 version of the game so meaning what patches it doesn't have is like 2-3weeks now and not a whole lot can change in that time frame for gameing.

Exactly, the benchmark is representing the release version of the game, and if its running that bad on nearly everyone's system, both mid and high end. Houston? Yeah we have a problem.

[LegionXNX]

Originally posted by 1080Puktra:

Originally posted by LegionXNX:

Capcom literally said the benchmark is separate from the beta. research it

No they did not they said the Beta was the same Beta while the benchmark is the closest thing to how the game will be at launch, you can literally see the game version dude.

yea, they are gonna keep touching up on it? like what you are thinking is gonna happen? because don't bother mentioning DD2 those are separate different teams.

[BEEP!]

Originally posted by LegionXNX:

Originally posted by 1080Puktra:

No they did not they said the Beta was the same Beta while the benchmark is the closest thing to how the game will be at launch, you can literally see the game version dude.

yea, they are gonna keep touching up on it? like what you are thinking is gonna happen? because don't bother mentioning DD2 those are separate different teams.

Yea a few weeks of patches at most which is barely any time to do much of anything when it involves optimization of a game, are you one of these people that believe in the day one patch that is promised in every AAA game ever that always disappoints.

The performance we got in the Benchmark is pretty much how the game is going to be at launch at most were talking about a slight improvement.

[Dae]

Aren't you the guy who tried to use the "It's two different teams, so it'll be different!" - referring to how DD2 went, argument?

EDIT:

Originally posted by LegionXNX:

because don't bother mentioning DD2 those are separate different teams.

Just as I say this, lmao I'm dead.

[LegionXNX]

Originally posted by 1080Puktra:

Originally posted by LegionXNX:

yea, they are gonna keep touching up on it? like what you are thinking is gonna happen? because don't bother mentioning DD2 those are separate different teams.

Yea a few weeks of patches at most which is barely any time to do much of anything when it involves optimization of a game, are you one of these people that believe in the day one patch that is promised in every AAA game ever that always disappoints.

No im just one of the people that don't run into new gen games with half decade old hardware running max graphics, no frame gen, no FPS cap, on some giant open world with effects flying across your screen.

Expecting everything to run buttery smooth. yes im one of those people

[LegionXNX]

Originally posted by Dae:

Aren't you the guy who tried to use the "It's two different teams, so it'll be different!" - referring to how DD2 went, argument?

Have you ever considered google?

[BEEP!]

Originally posted by LegionXNX:

Originally posted by 1080Puktra:

Yea a few weeks of patches at most which is barely any time to do much of anything when it involves optimization of a game, are you one of these people that believe in the day one patch that is promised in every AAA game ever that always disappoints.

No im just one of the people that don't run into new gen games with half decade old hardware running max graphics, no frame gen, no FPS cap, on some giant open world with effects flying across your screen.

Expecting everything to run buttery smooth. yes im one of those people

Ok so your calling even the devs lairs that admitted there are performance problems got it.

[Dae]

Originally posted by LegionXNX:

Originally posted by Dae:

Aren't you the guy who tried to use the "It's two different teams, so it'll be different!" - referring to how DD2 went, argument?

Have you ever considered google?

Have you ever considered critical thinking?

[LegionXNX]

Originally posted by 1080Puktra:

Originally posted by LegionXNX:

No im just one of the people that don't run into new gen games with half decade old hardware running max graphics, no frame gen, no FPS cap, on some giant open world with effects flying across your screen.

Expecting everything to run buttery smooth. yes im one of those people

Ok so your calling even the devs lairs that admitted there are performance problems got it.

Yea obviously there is gonna be problems like have you seen how vast the game is? of course there is gonna be problems but to say its gonna jeopardize the whole game is on some clown timing.

And do not ignore the factor people running into this with half decade old hardware. yea there will be problems for those people at least trying to hit around 120 fps on max graphics.