Why mixed reviews? Do game really perform that bad as they say? Or is something else?

[EternalLoop]

So asking for a future purchase, is really that bad, is there any ubiased review in yotube, because i only see rambling.

How bad is it. Can a mid-range PC like me can go for this for 1440p gaming at 60fps? I mean i downloaded the benchmark tool, and i don't mind framegen and dlss on.

My PC is a 12700k and a rtx 3090 with 32 ddr5 6000 ram.

I ran the benchmark and yes, on native is awfull, almost only 40 avg fps on ultra setting, and not much of a gain in low setting, feels unstable.

But enabling dlss and framegen i can really go to my monitor native hz, which is 75 (and has an overclock to 90hz so i can go over there, visually it doesn't look bad...

So I think it's a matter of just enabling those tech i bought for my card right?

[MeteoImpact]

> Can a mid-range PC like me can go for this for 1440p gaming at 60fps?
If you allow frame gen in that number, probably. If not, severely doubt it. Game performance is pretty close to the benchmark (particularly the scene that actually has a bunch of monsters in it), barring other technical issues causing stuttering for some people. If you are willing to accept upscaling and frame generation on a 3090(!!!) to hit pseudo-60fps, then sure, you'll get what you expect.

It's not just performance that drags it down either, but it's a big part of it. But the hunting is at times quite good, too, so it's very much a mixed bag.

[nYu]

game is too easy, thats the main problem

[NashDash]

It's runs fine! Actually it runs great! Buy it!

[GreenGuy]

Honestly, the performance is extremely a "your mileage may vary" thing.

Like, my computer is "a little better than average" by 2021's standard, and the game runs fine for me at 1080p/60fps with most of the settings at "High."

I'm completely okay with that, but others might treat anything less than getting 4k/120fps at all "Ultra" settings with the super-resolution pack installed is tantamount to having Capcom personally gouge their eyes out. Different standards for different folks, I suppose.

[Nebiros]

Originally posted by nYu:

game is too easy, thats the main problem

yeah and the expansion will be mixed because its too hard (looking at iceborne)

[Sephiroth]

Ryzen 9 3960X
RTX 2080TI
64 GB DDR5 RAM
m.2 SSD

Game runs fine on mid to high settings, with 50-60 FPS on 5120x1440 (FPS limit set to 60. No framegen, as my card doesn't support it, but DLSS in quality mode.

[Toez]

Sounds like bait

[EternalLoop]

Originally posted by Toez:

Sounds like bait

why?
I'm genuinely asking. Is because my specs are not up to date?, or something else?

[EternalLoop]

Originally posted by Sephiroth:

Ryzen 9 3960X
RTX 2080TI
64 GB DDR5 RAM
m.2 SSD

Game runs fine on mid to high settings, with 50-60 FPS on 5120x1440 (FPS limit set to 60. No framegen, as my card doesn't support it, but DLSS in quality mode.

Yeah, i've been testing some setting, and it seems that a mixed bag of mid-high settings is my go to for my resolution if i want stable 90fps. I don't currently have a good sigh so going for ultra is not really a thing for me. As long as it looks fluid i think ill go for whatever.

[MeteoImpact]

Originally posted by EternalLoop:

Originally posted by Toez:

Sounds like bait

why?
I'm genuinely asking. Is because my specs are not up to date?, or something else?

Possibly because you said you're getting 40fps on a 3090, which would be pretty absurd for most games, but with MH Wilds it really might just run that poorly...

[Julmara]

the benchmark probably didnt have denuvo in it
so thats also a big performance hit

[Bobotmeister]

they underestimated their minimum PC requirements. they just wanted to reach their financial targets so they released a poorly optimized game early. I hope this is just like early cyberpunk and be fixed down the road...

[EternalLoop]

Originally posted by MeteoImpact:

Originally posted by EternalLoop:

why?
I'm genuinely asking. Is because my specs are not up to date?, or something else?

Possibly because you said you're getting 40fps on a 3090, which would be pretty absurd for most games, but with MH Wilds it really might just run that poorly...

yeah it runs like that in some scenes that have a lot of going on, but it can go for 60 in scenes that doesn't have much going on.
This is more likely to see how my gpu performs and i can have a reference, at least on the benchmark tool:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fdW9AHywqs&t=745s

You can go over 60 if i downgrade my monitor to 1080p but i think if i want to downgrade my resolution better use dlss no, that's why we bought rtx cards after all.

And my gpu is 4years old, so i guess it's fine to run like this on a modern games, after all i'm getting not that good performance in marvel rivals as well, as i had with games 4 years ago, so i had to use dlss there too.

So i guess these last years games are better suited for more recent and powerful gpu.

[This PC]

Originally posted by EternalLoop:

Yeah, i've been testing some setting, and it seems that a mixed bag of mid-high settings is my go to for my resolution if i want stable 90fps. I don't currently have a good sigh so going for ultra is not really a thing for me. As long as it looks fluid i think ill go for whatever.

You'll do fine

[EternalLoop]

Originally posted by This PC:

Originally posted by EternalLoop:

Yeah, i've been testing some setting, and it seems that a mixed bag of mid-high settings is my go to for my resolution if i want stable 90fps. I don't currently have a good sigh so going for ultra is not really a thing for me. As long as it looks fluid i think ill go for whatever.

You'll do fine

nice, then, I'll go for it.