Can I run?

[Takingdomscosimog]

Machine 1-

RTX 4060
i7- 7700
16GB RAM

Machine 2 (laptop)-

RTX 3050 mobile
Ryzen 5 5600H
16GB RAM

[Takingdomscosimog]

Originally posted by DJukor:

Your CPU is a big bottleneck.
Your GPU is running over 30% worse than its full potential because of your CPU.

Contrary to popular belief upgrading your GPU is not the only thing that matters for new games.
Wilds will use 8 cores if your CPU has that many.

I had a i5 6600 whit a 2060 long time ago and when i bough a new pc whit a
i7 13700 games that ware unplayable suddenly ran perfectly fine on my new PC which had my old GPU.
I did end up upgrading my GPU to a 4070 so i could give my dad my old 2060 so he can play world of tanks.

Yeah this was my fear, the reason is because my motherboard is very limited. In fact the i7- 7700 is the best CPU that it can possibly have. I have plans to upgrade everything soon, but it's all I got for right now. The i7-7700 is only quad core too..

[Nanissaanah]

7800x3d
3080
32gb ddr5
mixed settings medium-high
without frame generation
dlss quality - performance doesnt matter in fps
i get around 50-65 in fights depending on the environment biome
with frame gen its around 80-100+ fps but a slight input delay

[GamingWithSilvertail]

Originally posted by meow:

Originally posted by Takingdomscosimog:

I can't tell if this is a joke are you being for real for real? 24GB?? This is normal now?

100% real, I had 16GB RAM and it was 100% utilized at all times

it might be different if you got on the DDR5 train because it's more potent but I doubt you did

Thats just how windows works, it allocates ram to a program.

[Nexi]

Originally posted by author:

It's sounding like I may have an issue only having 16GB ram right now. But when you say looks bad, like is it still overall looking okay, or just bad compared to how good it could potentially look?

Bad compared to how it can potentially look, it's still a great looking game honestly but sacrifices must be made unfortunately

[CrAZYVIC.]

Ohh, I highly doubt that. The optimization? Terrible. And with Denuvo on top? Yikes. I’ve got a 12-core Ryzen and a 4070 Ti, and this thing still runs like a busted shopping cart—with all drivers up to date, mind you.

Now, if you ask me, the bare minimum to play this properly?

A 6-core CPU running at 4.5 GHz (or higher).

16GB of RAM with nothing running in the background. But if you plan to have a browser open? You better have 24GB.

As for the GPU, I’d highly recommend an AMD RX 7700 XT or 7600 XT with Frame Generation—because without it? This thing is unplayable. Oh, and set Ray-Tracing to "Low", unless you enjoy your game looking like it came straight out of a PS3.

So, to put it nicely, neither of your systems can handle this. Not your fault—blame Capcom. But hey, don’t listen to the White-Knights who will swear up and down that they’re getting 4K/120 FPS on a toaster oven.

If you're short on resources, you could grab a used Xbox Series S and play it there—plus, it has cross-play.

[MartinQuiSa]

I play on a 4060, i5-12400F and 16GB RAM and it runs fine at high, with FSR and FG it stays at a stable 60

[Corey]

Originally posted by Takingdomscosimog:

Originally posted by meow:

100% real, I had 16GB RAM and it was 100% utilized at all times

it might be different if you got on the DDR5 train because it's more potent but I doubt you did

Damn they should make that part clear in the req section, are you only running the game and nothing else in the background or is it just eating up all the memory on it's own?

the recommended and minimum specs are an actual joke as neither can run this decently

[IskenderTheGreat]

The game is quite CPU intensive (due to hmm, Capcom's anti tamper) and your CPU might get a hit. REframework might help with this, among other stuff

The laptop with 3050, no chance.

16GB should be ok as a start, more RAM won't save you (RAM is a volatile and dynamic storage, works with your current storage, what doesn't fit on ram is offloaded to ssd and retransferred once needed)