anyone try the texture dlc with a 4070 super?

[s_greyjoy]

i know it says it requires a 16gb vram card... and the 4070s is 12gb... but has anyone tried it anyway? and any major difference in performance vs using high textures? playing on 1080p paired with an 15 13400f
trying to make the game look as good as it can. reshade has made it a lot better to be honest, but now wondering about the textures.

[Lucky Cat]

No harm in trying it yourself. If it can handle it after a hunt or two, then keep it! IMO, its rather pointless to have the High Res Texture DLC since it doesn't look all that different from High anyways, especially from a 27 inch 1440p monitor.

[R1in]

I have RTX 4080 and not using this ♥♥♥♥♥♥ texture pack. It looks great and sharp but textures are simply takes time to load and in most cases there are unloaded textures on the screen, doesn't happen on simply HIGH textures at all, only happens with this pack

[Aethen]

Regular 4070. Doesn't seem to impact my fps much but it creates partially loaded, blurry textures when I turn my camera around so I went back to High.

[SomRandmGuy]

Got a Radeon 7900 (20 gb vram) and that mf at a constant 95% on just regular high, counting on the performance optimizations before i try the next step up

[Roy]

Run HWinfo in background while playing for 20 minutes. Then look at the maximum VRAM usage (called % of dedicated memory used under GPU). NVIDIA's compression method is different from AMD so the VRAM required for games is different for each. NVIDIA requires less VRAM, but it may not be a saving grace with that bloated texture pack. You also can't go off how much VRAM someone with 24GB of VRAM uses. Sometimes a game will fill what's available, and more the longer you play. The smaller pool of VRAM you have the more it will efficiently clear out unused data for streaming in new data. But if you're constantly needing to empty and stream in new, you will get stutters before reaching the entirety of your VRAM limit, by a few hundred MB.