Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yes, if you get that 32 GB RAM
How can you be so confidentally wrong.
There's a few benchmarks on YouTube. Didn't find a recent one but if you can tolerate sub 30fps without frame gen, this might be for you. The game will be more demanding when you go into the forest though.
Wrong about what? They didn't specify which settings they want to run Wilds, just if they can run it. You even agreed they could run it.
Technically you are right, the game will start and maybe he can watch the cutscenes.
If he considers 25fps playable is up to him, though. But I wouldn't call it "easily" to be fair. This gives a wrong impression.
Well, I meant that with minimum graphics settings could I play the game with 60 fps, since my GPU has just 4 VRAM, and I also used the benchmark but it was sometimes laggy, idk if it's bc my GPU (I searched and it's not that good, it's kinda old) or if it's bc of the ram
I hate those. If you use a cooling plate in addition, mayhaps.