Runs good on a RX6600

[בתאניה]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gN4i85oHle8

[BEEP!]

That's with FSR at balanced with Framegen so that's actually around the 30-40s in fps.
Which to have framegen look good & feel good at min you need a base line stable 60fps & preferably 70fps.
Otherwise it'l look bad & feel even worse than normal 30fps locked.

[בתאניה]

Originally posted by 1080Puktra:

That's with FSR at balanced with Framegen so that's actually around the 30-40s in fps.
Which to have framegen look good & feel good at min you need a base line stable 60fps & preferably 70fps.
Otherwise it'l look bad & feel even worse than normal 30fps locked.

It doesn't look bad and I made 3 tests, and at the end I bumped it to quality FSR, people need to not complain about FSR and frame gen. it actually keeps these old cards going.

[BEEP!]

Originally posted by בתאניה:

Originally posted by 1080Puktra:

That's with FSR at balanced with Framegen so that's actually around the 30-40s in fps.
Which to have framegen look good & feel good at min you need a base line stable 60fps & preferably 70fps.
Otherwise it'l look bad & feel even worse than normal 30fps locked.

It doesn't look bad and I made 3 tests, and at the end I bumped it to quality FSR, people need to not complain about FSR and frame gen. it actually keeps these old cards going.

Have you played the demo with the same settings, if so if you can't reach a stable 60fps at min, there's no point in using Framegen because at that point you're game will have artifacts & it'l have more input delay than a locked 30fps.
There's nothing wrong with FSR & FG never said that I simply told you how you should be using FG it's not a miracle tech.
In short you'd be better at playing a locked 30fps or locked 45fps what ever is the lowest frame for you the game would litterly feel better to play that way.

Also a benchmark that doesn't move the camera in a fast motion with Framegen won't show how bad the artifacts are & a benchmark you'l never feel how bad the game actually feels.

[del_bosque_dol]

Default scaling is at 0.5, which affects the graphics, but in order not to dip fps too low, using FSR and Frame Gen are very important for older GPU. You can increase the graphic quality quite a lot by adjusting FSR quality setting as well as scaling a bit higher.

Scaling 1 and FSR plus Frame Gen as well as removing fog, depth of field, motion blur, these settings make absolutely clear and really high quality even with FSR and Frame Gen. The only question is that it may affect fps.

[DAVOS CENSORSHIP 2030 FTW!!!]

Why are you trying to convince this Kid? If he think ♥♥♥♥ smells great, that it does.

A lot of Conformist don't give a Crap about how their Game looks and runs, like Console Players.

There's a reason why i stopped buying Consoles myself which are the most Anticonsumer Toasters you can get nowadays.

[BEEP!]

Originally posted by del_bosque_dol:

Default scaling is at 0.5, which affects the graphics, but in order not to dip fps too low, using FSR and Frame Gen are very important for older GPU. You can increase the graphic quality quite a lot by adjusting FSR quality setting as well as scaling a bit higher.

Scaling 1 and FSR plus Frame Gen as well as removing fog, depth of field, motion blur, these settings make absolutely clear and really high quality even with FSR and Frame Gen. The only question is that it may affect fps.

OP might as well play at locked 30fps or 40fps because using Framegen while under 60fps will make it feel worse than playing at locked 30fps, & the game will look better & play better as well.

[RotGoblin]

Ayy, good job, I hope you have fun! Glad to see the rx6600's still getting by.

Don't let the haters bring you down.

[Volpiano]

Originally posted by NGREEDIA HAS GONE TOO FAR!!!:

Why are you trying to convince this Kid? If he think ♥♥♥♥ smells great, that it does.

A lot of Conformist don't give a Crap about how their Game looks and runs, like Console Players.

There's a reason why i stopped buying Consoles myself which are the most Anticonsumer Toasters you can get nowadays.

Thats why we will never get into an agreement, some people dont mind running the game like complete garbage, artifacts and blurry ♥♥♥♥ all around... and they will come here make a post saying ''IM RUNNING ON A 3060 AND IT RUNS JUST FINE BRO'' we will never know what ''fine'' means to them, some players just dont care about any of this. Its a never ending cycle of stupidity.

[RotGoblin]

Originally posted by Volpiano:

Originally posted by NGREEDIA HAS GONE TOO FAR!!!:

Why are you trying to convince this Kid? If he think ♥♥♥♥ smells great, that it does.

A lot of Conformist don't give a Crap about how their Game looks and runs, like Console Players.

There's a reason why i stopped buying Consoles myself which are the most Anticonsumer Toasters you can get nowadays.

Thats why we will never get into an agreement, some people dont mind running the game like complete garbage, artifacts and blurry ♥♥♥♥ all around... and they will come here make a post saying ''IM RUNNING ON A 3060 AND IT RUNS JUST FINE BRO'' we will never know what ''fine'' means to them, some players just dont care about any of this. Its a never ending cycle of stupidity.

Stupidity is seeing someone having a good time and yelling "NO, YOU SHOULD FEEL BAD"

[Wild]

Originally posted by Goblin:

Ayy, good job, I hope you have fun! Glad to see the rx6600's still getting by.

Don't let the haters bring you down.

Judging by how beefy his CPU is that's probably not his main GPU anyway lol, probably grabbed a friend's GPU or from an older computer.

Also it better run at least as well as the ps5, since that GPU is on the recommended requirements.

[בתאניה]

Originally posted by Wild:

Originally posted by Goblin:

Ayy, good job, I hope you have fun! Glad to see the rx6600's still getting by.

Don't let the haters bring you down.

Judging by how beefy his CPU is that's probably not his main GPU anyway lol, probably grabbed a friend's GPU or from an older computer.

Also it better run at least as well as the ps5, since that GPU is on the recommended requirements.

my 7900XTX broke, so 6600 is all I have for backup atm, I will just get a 9070XT once those release. But the 6600 works pretty good as I said, with FSR+frame gen ..it's a 1080p card and it can run everything at 1440p with upscaling, even new games like Kingdom Come: Deliverance II.

[GamingWithSilvertail]

Originally posted by 1080Puktra:

That's with FSR at balanced with Framegen so that's actually around the 30-40s in fps.
Which to have framegen look good & feel good at min you need a base line stable 60fps & preferably 70fps.
Otherwise it'l look bad & feel even worse than normal 30fps locked.

Your partiallyy right.

Framegen isnt an additional form of upscaling...

The reaso nit 'll look bad is because of FSR/DLSS at 1080P. All FG most of the time does is add input lag but I found it to be not enough to put me off on my rtx 3060 Ti ryzne 3600...

[RotGoblin]

Originally posted by GamingWithSilvertail:

Originally posted by 1080Puktra:

That's with FSR at balanced with Framegen so that's actually around the 30-40s in fps.
Which to have framegen look good & feel good at min you need a base line stable 60fps & preferably 70fps.
Otherwise it'l look bad & feel even worse than normal 30fps locked.

Your partiallyy right.

Framegen isnt an additional form of upscaling...

The reaso nit 'll look bad is because of FSR/DLSS at 1080P. All FG most of the time does is add input lag but I found it to be not enough to put me off on my rtx 3060 Ti ryzne 3600...

I found the input lag acceptable, but the ghosting/artifacting not so much.

But again, they said they were using an outdated FG in the beta, so we'll see come launch. I'm not against using it if it looks good.

I care far more about things looking right than running great, to be fair. Which is why I never used DLSS in World because the dithering was AWFUL.

[GamingWithSilvertail]

Originally posted by Goblin:

Originally posted by GamingWithSilvertail:

Your partiallyy right.

Framegen isnt an additional form of upscaling...

The reaso nit 'll look bad is because of FSR/DLSS at 1080P. All FG most of the time does is add input lag but I found it to be not enough to put me off on my rtx 3060 Ti ryzne 3600...

I found the input lag acceptable, but the ghosting/artifacting not so much.

But again, they said they were using an outdated FG in the beta, so we'll see come launch. I'm not against using it if it looks good.

I care far more about things looking right than running great, to be fair. Which is why I never used DLSS in World because the dithering was AWFUL.

Ghosting depends on monitor too, I dont have that issue, I am ujsing a gigabyte gs27q 200 usd monitor which is 1440 and 165 hrtz

[NeoX]

Originally posted by בתאניה:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gN4i85oHle8

The power of the CPU holds up the performance very nicely! Can only repeat myself:
Its in 80% of all cases the CPU that sets the performance level for you and in 2nd place your GPU's VRAM.

Here my test: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uricga09EA

As you can see the difference between highest and lowest settings is just around 20 fps what speaks a lot for a CPU bottleneck. That i do not have laggs or super bad-frame drops is given why the high amoung of CPU cores (12>8) that my system has.

So i can only repeat myself that the CPU is the base performance factor in this game.

2nd in place is the VRAM. In all my tests it was always around 10-11GB of VRAm usage and that in 1080P. You can find some reports in this forum of RTX4060(ti) users where the difference between the 8 and 16GB VRAM models, are over 60% difference in frame amounts.

So yeah, priority one is the CPU and in 2nd place GPU with solid VRAM amount.

With your CPU (and its massice core amount + X3D Cache) a noticeable CPU bottleneck will be almost impossible for you in this game.

Edit:
Have a little steam-award for that share :-)