game runs like **** poor optimization

[HOBO ACTUAL]

i have 32 GB of ddr4 ram, a ryzen 9 3900x 12 core 3.8 Ghz, RTX 3070 and my rig wont even get above 50 fps. 60 is like a bare minimum for games that require quick reactions. how the hell can i run every other game on highest settings but this game runs like a damn brick and looks like ass? even the higher graphics cards are having a hard time getting to 60. also why the hell are all these people saying "i dont understand why youre not getting above 60 fps" then the dont answer more than that like ♥♥♥♥ off.

[HOBO ACTUAL]

a game like war thunder, squad, hell divers, all have the same size if not larger maps and i can run all on max settings im not asking much just for the game to run at a smooth 60 fps and not look like ass. but mh wildlands looks like a brick on medium settings, and makes use of a single setting as a crutch to not be unplayable. they should delay it. the mechanics and game seem hella fun but its not ready. even mh world had terrible optimization at the start and needed kinks worked out. give it some more time before release please.

[robruckus65]

Yea its wild. Unless you are way above the recommended specs for the settings you are trying to run you can't run this game 60 fps at native resolution you have to upscale which is absurd. and then the closer you get to the recommended specs for that setting you need to run frame gen to maintain 60 fps which is even more absurd.

[Scyris]

The problem I feel is the engine they are using, its a engine meant for small corriors/hallways and small rooms, its not meant for large open area's like a monster hunter game usually has. I don't think any amount of optimizing is going to fix it either, not when it was never meant for a game like MHWilds in the first place. Capcom just wanted to be cheap and didn't want to have to pay to license a proper engine for this sort of game.

[Hünterli-san]

A 3070 is already 4 years old again. The game already looks far better than the titles you mentioned. I would rather compare it to games like Cyberpunk, Outlaws or Kingdom Come 2, which also use quite modern technology and run in a similar way.
Now with a 4070 Ti with DLSS on quality I had around 70 to 80 FPS with Frame Gen then certainly over 100, even playing in Ultrawide, so that draws even more power.

Unfortunately, the 3070 was a bit of a customer scam with the 8 GB VRam, which is no longer enough today. The 12 GB of my 4070ti are fully utilized in almost all titles.

Modern engines need more than 12 GB or better 16 GB to run really well in terms of V Ram.

[Scyris]

Originally posted by Hünterli-san:

A 3070 is already 4 years old again. The game already looks far better than the titles you mentioned. I would rather compare it to games like Cyberpunk, Outlaws or Kingdom Come 2, which also use quite modern technology and run in a similar way.
Now with a 4070 Ti with DLSS on quality I had around 70 to 80 FPS with Frame Gen then certainly over 100, even playing in Ultrawide, so that draws even more power.

Unfortunately, the 3070 TI was a bit of a customer scam with the 8 GB VRam, which is no longer enough today. The 12 GB of my 4070ti are fully utilized in almost all titles.

The problem here is you need to consider the average pc user in the market, most people don't even have a 3000 series nvidia card, its kinda like crysis back in the day, only like the top 1% of pc owners could even run the game at a playable fps due to how demanding it was on hardware. Like "can it run crysis" was a meme for years in pc gaming as it was the best looking game for its time if anything it was prob over a generation ahead graphically. Yeah you can say "well buy a better pc" but thats just not feasable for most people. In general you want your game to be able to run well on even mid end systems to help with sales. But this game runs so poorly that with reccomended specs you prob get 10 fps at 1080p native. Going to be alot of unhappy pc customers when this releases as the reccomended specs are an outright lie, and they need to be MUCH MUCH higher than what is listed. Buddy of mine has a pc he just got with a 4070 super, and he can't really hit 60 fps native at 1440p, which is insane considering the game barely looks better than the last monster hunter game.

[Ograus]

maybe i am quoting myself here in a way
but forza horizon 4 (2018) much bigger and more detailed open gaming world runs smooth as silk on maxed settings fhd on sandy bridge/ivy bridge/haswell 4c8t cpus (i7 and sibling xeon e3) with gtx 1070/1660 class gpus
one can find videos of this

same goes without maxing out settings so for fh5
and even for mh world

comparing mh wilds beta/benchmark with fh5 in terms of visuals on current hardware maxing oout settings
or with something like black myth wukong or warhammer 40k spaeec marine 2

well wilds does noit look good sadly :-(

funfact
the mh wilds benchmark runs on such hardware even if it is below official min spec
but it requires upscaling and framegen in minimum settings

[HOBO ACTUAL]

Originally posted by Hünterli-san:

A 3070 is already 4 years old again. The game already looks far better than the titles you mentioned. I would rather compare it to games like Cyberpunk, Outlaws or Kingdom Come 2, which also use quite modern technology and run in a similar way.
Now with a 4070 Ti with DLSS on quality I had around 70 to 80 FPS with Frame Gen then certainly over 100, even playing in Ultrawide, so that draws even more power.

Unfortunately, the 3070 was a bit of a customer scam with the 8 GB VRam, which is no longer enough today. The 12 GB of my 4070ti are fully utilized in almost all titles.

Modern engines need more than 12 GB or better 16 GB to run really well in terms of V Ram.

The game does not at all look better than any of the mentioned games on max settings. I can run war thunder on movie mode with beautiful sun rays and water reflection and still get like 90 fps. Hell divers looks much much better than this game and so does squad what crack you smoking. Even rise looks better than this.

[HOBO ACTUAL]

I just want developers to understand most players don’t give a ♥♥♥♥ about all these super fancy graphics if every ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ game released is gonna cost an arm and a leg to be able to play in hardware. Just make a game that runs well and is slightly less visually appealing. I wouldn’t bat an eye lash. We don’t need 4 k ray tracing ultra real graphics ffs.

[WEF CENSORSHIP 2030 FTW!!!]

Originally posted by HOBO ACTUAL:

I just want developers to understand most players don’t give a ♥♥♥♥ about all these super fancy graphics if every ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ game released is gonna cost an arm and a leg to be able to play in hardware. Just make a game that runs well and is slightly less visually appealing. I wouldn’t bat an eye lash. We don’t need 4 k ray tracing ultra real graphics ffs.

The majority of MH Fanbase didn't give a ♥♥♥♥ about playing an Expensive Prototype Tech Demo that markets Embedded Fake Frame Gen. That's not why they played MH, lol. Crapcom thinks they give a Crap if every Blade of Grass is rendered and has a Conciousness of its own while it cooks Players whole PC at 15 FPS Vaseline Slideshow.

Now they will have to use Wilds as PC Hardware Benchmark instead of Crysis.

[zmanbuilder]

I have a lot of RAM as well but i have yet to see a game that actually uses it lol.

[GamingWithSilvertail]

Originally posted by NGREEDIA HAS GONE TOO FAR!!!:

Originally posted by HOBO ACTUAL:

I just want developers to understand most players don’t give a ♥♥♥♥ about all these super fancy graphics if every ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ game released is gonna cost an arm and a leg to be able to play in hardware. Just make a game that runs well and is slightly less visually appealing. I wouldn’t bat an eye lash. We don’t need 4 k ray tracing ultra real graphics ffs.

The majority of MH Fanbase didn't give a ♥♥♥♥ about playing an Expensive Prototype Tech Demo that markets Embedded Fake Frame Gen. That's not why they played MH, lol. Crapcom thinks they give a Crap if every Blade of Grass is rendered and has a Conciousness of its own while it cooks Players whole PC at 15 FPS Vaseline Slideshow.

Now they will have to use Wilds as PC Hardware Benchmark instead of Crysis.

This aint a new crisis. The whole problem with crisus was that you couldnt play higher settings with any card that was out yet.

You can right now.

[BlightedDreams]

Originally posted by HOBO ACTUAL:

i have 32 GB of ddr4 ram, a ryzen 9 3900x 12 core 3.8 Ghz, RTX 3070 and my rig wont even get above 50 fps. 60 is like a bare minimum for games that require quick reactions. how the hell can i run every other game on highest settings but this game runs like a damn brick and looks like ass? even the higher graphics cards are having a hard time getting to 60. also why the hell are all these people saying "i dont understand why youre not getting above 60 fps" then the dont answer more than that like ♥♥♥♥ off.

U tlking about the beta? the raw gameplay that they didnt put effort in so they can prioritize the actual game?