Benchmark running terrible with 3060

[Ozzi]

https://i.imgur.com/hWQnhWW.png

Score: 15385
Average FPS: 45.22
Resolution: 1920x1080
Graphics settings: High
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 5500
GPU: NVIDIA 3060
RAM: 16GB
GPU Driver Version: 566.03

These are my results on High preset with raytracing entirely disabled and frame gen on Balanced. Is there anything that is causing the performance to be this bad? The village and savannah barely manage 30FPS for me... I really want to play this game if possible, but I don't have the money to upgrade my GPU.

And no, I'm not going to run it any lower than High. It already looks worse than World as it is, I'm willing to tweak individual settings if they're big bottlenecks, but if I have to run it at Medium presets or lower it's such a bad experience that I'd rather not get the game at all.

[RotGoblin]

Originally posted by LKatsu!:

Originally posted by Kriya Takagi:

"A new graphics card typically needs to offer at least a 30-50% performance increase over your current one to warrant an upgrade, depending on your current resolution and desired frame rates, as well as the price difference between the two cards; a smaller performance boost might not justify the cost of upgrading. "
also from around reddit and stuff people say 50% increase is about the average they feel is worth it for upgrading if a person is looking at upgrading to a newer card.

This is an excuse for a single game release being unplayble on 30 series cards at 1080p 30fps? Even for a jump of 50% performance, it is for ONE single unoptimized game, doesn't matter if the next GPU comes with +200% performance. Not worth it.

R5 5500 (extremely budget CPU from 2022) on a 6700XT (cheap midrange GPU from (2021)

FSR Quality, no Frame Gen. Mostly high settings...

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3421563382

That's perfectly playable at 1440p.

People keep saying 'you need a rockship computer' when.. you just don't.

Nvidia need an updated driver, and users need to realise their 4+ year old GPU's need to either turn down the graphics or accept a lower frame rate.

[Kriya Takagi]

Originally posted by LKatsu!:

Originally posted by Kriya Takagi:

"A new graphics card typically needs to offer at least a 30-50% performance increase over your current one to warrant an upgrade, depending on your current resolution and desired frame rates, as well as the price difference between the two cards; a smaller performance boost might not justify the cost of upgrading. "
also from around reddit and stuff people say 50% increase is about the average they feel is worth it for upgrading if a person is looking at upgrading to a newer card.

This is an excuse for a single game release being unplayble on 30 series cards at 1080p 30fps? Even for a jump of 50% performance, it is for ONE single unoptimized game, doesn't matter if the next GPU comes with +200% performance. Not worth it.

im just stating that on average when it comes to people who might be looking at going for an upgrade 50% performance boost is generally looked at as a good baseline when upgrading, now it depends on the individual if they deem 50% as worth it or not. its just an average where most would deem 50% performance increases as worth it to upgrade.

[Scyris]

I can't even stand the framegen I have a RTX 3060 TI myself, the framegen has massive ghosting to the point the game makes my eyes water. I don't think any amount of optimization is going to fix this either because the problem is the engine itself, its a engine made for small hallways, corridors and small rooms, it is not meant for a big open world like this and the preformance shows this. Capcom just didn't wanna have to pay to license a proper engine for this sort of game, they cheaped out, and the result is them using the wrong engine for the wrong game and performance suffers.

Whats worse is this is going to have denuvo, so knock 10-20% performance off of whatever you got in the benchmark. For me, thats going to basically set me at sub 30 fps on low with Nvidia DSLL or whatever the Ai one is. The reccomended specs for this game prob can't even get 10 fps at 1080p on low I suspect. I have a Ryzen 7 3700x Cpu 16gb ram and a Geforce RTX 3060 Ti. I can play world no problem at 60 fps and it even looks better than wilds does as I do not need any upscaling to hit that fps, its native.

[BCFreeman]

Frame gen introduces that ghosting around your character when it moves. I don't like it.

[BEEP!]

Originally posted by BCFreeman:

Frame gen introduces that ghosting around your character when it moves. I don't like it.

Yea I'm willing to bet since there on a 3060Ti theey most likely don't have a min stable 60fps locked or recommended 70fps locked to help avoid the ghosting issue as much as possible.

[Lieutenant Dan]

you need an entirely new PC if you want 60+ high settings btw.
not just a new GPU

[Kriya Takagi]

Originally posted by Lieutenant Dan:

you need an entirely new PC if you want 60+ high settings btw.
not just a new GPU

i was kinda forced into getting an entire new system. my last pc was on its last leg last week and i had some big assignments coming up that week for school. but alot of places were sold out of pc's that were relatively similar to my last one and the only one i could get delivered to me in about two days was the i9 with a 4070 super ti. every thing else would have been available by near the end of the month. im just happy that i was able to get it since it was the last one in stock. hate that it was an emergency buy but i just chalk it up to a school expense. drained my emergency pc fund but hey thats what i was tossing money aside over time for just for cases like this.

[Tyler the inflator]

Originally posted by Husker:

Originally posted by Ozzi:

https://i.imgur.com/hWQnhWW.png

Score: 15385
Average FPS: 45.22
Resolution: 1920x1080
Graphics settings: High
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 5500
GPU: NVIDIA 3060
RAM: 16GB
GPU Driver Version: 566.03

These are my results on High preset with raytracing entirely disabled and frame gen on Balanced. Is there anything that is causing the performance to be this bad? The village and savannah barely manage 30FPS for me... I really want to play this game if possible, but I don't have the money to upgrade my GPU.

And no, I'm not going to run it any lower than High. It already looks worse than World as it is, I'm willing to tweak individual settings if they're big bottlenecks, but if I have to run it at Medium presets or lower it's such a bad experience that I'd rather not get the game at all.

Upgrade your old and outdated hardware if you want to play newly released games. Not the dev nor the games fault you didn't save up for this release. There are previous MH games you can enjoy while you save money that run fine on your old hardware.

It is the devs fault when they can't make a game playable foe the average user

[Tyler the inflator]

Originally posted by Varon:

fine with mine 3070, average 90 fps in high settings

Wihlth ir without frame gen?

[Supi18122]

meanwhile i just bought a 3060 and will enjoy my paltry 45fps on wilds once i buy the game (that will be a few months off still granted, see if they maybe but it on sale at some point lol)

bargain bin life is rough XD

[RotGoblin]

Originally posted by Supi18122:

meanwhile i just bought a 3060 and will enjoy my paltry 45fps on wilds once i buy the game (that will be a few months off still granted, see if they maybe but it on sale at some point lol)

bargain bin life is rough XD

3060 12gb right?