Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
OP says the performance is bad, so why would someone who thinks the performance is bad want to pre-order the game when they think the performance is bad?
I'm sure the game will vastly change in 2 weeks.
It certainly will since they specifically mentioned that none of the improvements made since the last beta test were implemented in this round. You know the improvements to performance, the stuff your complaining about. Use your brain.
Yes I noticed something like a tint or filter messing with the graphics.
Yeah, DD2 runs great too, also on the same engine.
- 1° guy says Raytracing doesn't make much sense cause the game is in the desert with sandstorm/haze/no much direct sunlight / water when there is more than 1 map, again probably just lacking general knowledge about the game and he focus on the benchmark when you could argue that RT is in the option for final release even if it isn't really used that much in the benchmark apart from the oasis scene
-2° guy completly omit the fact that it is an old un-optimised beta build wich seems very misleading to judge on what the game could be based on that beta, a little disclaimer would be nice and feel more serious
They do have great points tho on the overall graphics of the game