why is it 70 dollars

[The Navigator]

? and also why do you not have proper keyboard + mouse support, why do you still have mouse acceleration ,why is there no fov slider,etcetcetc

[Anna]

Автор сообщения: Moonwitch

And what game was that?

I'm assuming they mean ReFantazio or Call Of Duty (Registered Trademark Symbol)

[Moonwitch]

Автор сообщения: Valier

Автор сообщения: Moonwitch

And what game was that?

I'm assuming they mean ReFantazio or Call Of Duty (Registered Trademark Symbol)

If they're referring to Metaphor, I bought that on sale -25% off. For Call of Duty, I purchased the MW II remake for -45% off.

Both well under $60.

[Tefty]

Автор сообщения: Kashra Fall

Автор сообщения: Moonwitch

And what game was that?

Diablo 4.

Cookie for this person. Diablo 4 was indeed $70 at release and is by one of the worst corrupt organisations out there for malpractice of loot boxes and micro-transactions that were banned in a European country to boot.

[Moonwitch]

Автор сообщения: Tefty

Автор сообщения: Kashra Fall

Diablo 4.

Cookie for this person. Diablo 4 was indeed $70 at release and is by one of the worst corrupt organisations out there for malpractice of loot boxes and micro-transactions that were banned in a European country to boot.

Oh Diablo 4? Let me check my receipt on that while this person continues clowning themselves on every steam discussion.

[nowhere man]

Автор сообщения: Guy_Manley

Because games are 70 dollars now?

Not ones that looks like switch ports.

[Akemua]

Автор сообщения: Tefty

Автор сообщения: Kashra Fall

Diablo 4.

Cookie for this person. Diablo 4 was indeed $70 at release and is by one of the worst corrupt organisations out there for malpractice of loot boxes and micro-transactions that were banned in a European country to boot.

Just so you're aware, Diablo 4 wasn't made by the same people who made Overwatch. Diablo 4 doesn't have lootboxes, but it is full of MTX for cosmetics.

I know you're talking about Blizzard, but there is still a slight difference.

[Tefty]

Автор сообщения: Moonwitch

Автор сообщения: Valier

I'm assuming they mean ReFantazio or Call Of Duty (Registered Trademark Symbol)

If they're referring to Metaphor, I bought that on sale -25% off. For Call of Duty, I purchased the MW II remake for -45% off.

Both well under $60.

But MW2 was $70 at release and you still brought it later and are here complaining about MHW being $70 at launch so you are supporting these companies that you are so anti about their pricing

[RakataEpsilon]

$70 isnt a lot considering this will probably get 4 or 5 years of support. You can always wait until it comes down if its too expensive for you

[Terron]

Because inflation. We are lucky new games are just 70 and many are not even that. Games are much cheaper today given inflation than they were in the 90s.

[Moonwitch]

Автор сообщения: Moonwitch

Автор сообщения: Tefty

Cookie for this person. Diablo 4 was indeed $70 at release and is by one of the worst corrupt organisations out there for malpractice of loot boxes and micro-transactions that were banned in a European country to boot.

Oh Diablo 4? Let me check my receipt on that while this person continues clowning themselves on every steam discussion.

Bought Diablo 4 for 56.69 when it was, again, -25% off. Wowie imagine that.

[nowhere man]

Автор сообщения: Terron

Because inflation. We are lucky new games are just 70 and many are not even that. Games are much cheaper today given inflation than they were in the 90s.

You can´t compare manufactured products to digital downloads, i'm sorry, you are watching too much asmongold, your IQ is being drained.

[Moonwitch]

Автор сообщения: Tefty

Автор сообщения: Moonwitch

If they're referring to Metaphor, I bought that on sale -25% off. For Call of Duty, I purchased the MW II remake for -45% off.

Both well under $60.

But MW2 was $70 at release and you still brought it later and are here complaining about MHW being $70 at launch so you are supporting these companies that you are so anti about their pricing

If you actually went through my post history I've been complaining how the benchmark runs like a complete embarrassing mess lmao. Keep on the dog piling though, that's all you lot have. The $70 tag is just icing on the moldy cake. Clown me because I am right.

[nowhere man]

Автор сообщения: Akemua

Автор сообщения: Terron

Because inflation. We are lucky new games are just 70 and many are not even that. Games are much cheaper today given inflation than they were in the 90s.

Thank you. Someone that actually knows their gaming history. Games didn't have a standard price until the early 2000's, and it was by far cheaper than what you had to pay in the 90's.

Just stop, that guy is blatantly wrong. Games were manufactured products with a lot of aggregate value attached to them. Now they're just digital downloads, just a sad excuse for a product.

[RakataEpsilon]

Автор сообщения: Terron

Because inflation. We are lucky new games are just 70 and many are not even that. Games are much cheaper today given inflation than they were in the 90s.

This is very true. A little past my time but I remember when I got a ps2 and going into a store and those ps1 games were still hella expensive back then at $50. Thats like $90 bucks now

[nowhere man]

Автор сообщения: RakataEpsilon

Автор сообщения: Terron

Because inflation. We are lucky new games are just 70 and many are not even that. Games are much cheaper today given inflation than they were in the 90s.

This is very true. A little past my time but I remember when I got a ps2 and going into a store and those ps1 games were still hella expensive back then at $50

No it's not, stop believing nonsense. I dont know why this nonsense sticks this much to people's brains.