Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Okay maybe I'm not up to date on hardware, are you saying an Intel® Core™ i5-10400 is better than what I have? Because that's under the "recommended" specs.
Ryzen 7 5700X3D, RTX 3070.
I usually play at 1440p, but even playing this on 1080p, i can't barely get stable 60 frames, Performance DLSS. I get something like 44 - 54 frames when fighting.
It's crazy when you think that games like Red Dead Redemption 2 has nicer graphics and way more smooth framerate than this.
Yeah, and I'm within the Recommend specs, so according to their logic, I SHOULD be able to hit "60 FPS with framegen enabled." ...Oh right, framegen only works on 40XX cards.
Even then, I should be able to have playable framerates on the lowest setting, and I don't.
But don't try it in the beta, looks terrible in that version. Benchmark on the other side with an FSR-Update to 3.1 is ok ^^
Yeah, that's well above what I have. It's pretty obvious my CPU is a bottleneck, so I don't know why they have CPUs as low as an 15-10400 on the "recommended" specs.
4K, All Very High 60-80 Fps