I'm getting it for the PS5 pro and postponing getting it for PC

[Zenkaiboost Kekkei Genkai]

I think this is the decision to make right now, I really don't feel like dealing with PC gaming problems and bs right now , I just want the game to work well from the start, I don't have the patience for yet another dumpster fire launch and waiting for months and dozens of updates to get the game in a acceptable state .. nope

... this is the worst part of PC gaming, and I don't want to deal with it right now. I'm fed up with this bs... just look at Spiderman 2 , yeah nope . nope nope. no.

[MangoMan305]

Enjoy your PSSR shimmering/artifacting galore to maintain 60 fps. As if that CPU can even maintain 60 fps in certain spots

[zmanbuilder]

Okay, full crossplay, see you in the wilds.

Though likely not me specifically, as i like to play solo.

[Zenkaiboost Kekkei Genkai]

MangoMan305 lähetti viestin:

Enjoy your PSSR shimmering/artifacting galore to maintain 60 fps. As if that CPU can even maintain 60 fps in certain spots

it can and it will, witcher 3 runs and looks fantastic on the pro, and so does spiderman 2, and forbidden west.

it's on PC where all these games run like ♥♥♥♥.


and btw all these games I mentioned look 3 times better than Wilds.

[Luna ~]

PS5 12 FPS version KEKW

[Egon]

ran the benchmark just now and got a solid avg 100fps with ultra setting on 4k. Ryzen 3900X and RTX4080 and not a single hiccup.
Of course we'll see how this game actually plays on launch. I agree that console is a more stable experience usually but this isn't the kinda game I wanna sink 100 plus hours on both PS5 then PC afterwards.

[Zenkaiboost Kekkei Genkai]

Luna lähetti viestin:

PS5 12 FPS version KEKW

the game is optimized for console not PC, and PS5 pro will get the enhanced patch day 1, this is the best platform to run the game on day 1 hands down.

have fun dealing with PC crappy framerates and crappy frame generation for the next 3 months to a year , either that or go buy a 5090

[Kennyboi]

Egon lähetti viestin:

ran the benchmark just now and got a solid avg 100fps with ultra setting on 4k. Ryzen 3900X and RTX4080 and not a single hiccup.
Of course we'll see how this game actually plays on launch. I agree that console is a more stable experience usually but this isn't the kinda game I wanna sink 100 plus hours on both PS5 then PC afterwards.

I didn't know your system was faster than a rtx 5090 paired with a 9800x3d

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DcXrfdIyzus

[GamingWithSilvertail]

Zenkaiboost Kekkei Genkai lähetti viestin:

MangoMan305 lähetti viestin:

Enjoy your PSSR shimmering/artifacting galore to maintain 60 fps. As if that CPU can even maintain 60 fps in certain spots

it can and it will, witcher 3 runs and looks fantastic on the pro, and so does spiderman 2, and forbidden west.

it's on PC where all these games run like ♥♥♥♥.


and btw all these games I mentioned look 3 times better than Wilds.

If a game like witcher 3, and this is about the next gen version.... does not run well for you, then you have worse then a 1080 GTX setup.,...

[Your CEO, our choice]

Egon lähetti viestin:

ran the benchmark just now and got a solid avg 100fps with ultra setting on 4k. Ryzen 3900X and RTX4080 and not a single hiccup.
Of course we'll see how this game actually plays on launch. I agree that console is a more stable experience usually but this isn't the kinda game I wanna sink 100 plus hours on both PS5 then PC afterwards.

the benchmark is a lie 2 cutscenes and no combat to make you feel good to buy the game!

[Raklap]

i think the bench is okey
You got a bit RT, Fur sim, Monsters, openword, lobby with NPC-s. The avg FPS is bs but you can get an idea if you watch only the hub to hub part.

[Niczu]

Zenkaiboost Kekkei Genkai lähetti viestin:

Luna lähetti viestin:

PS5 12 FPS version KEKW

have fun dealing with PC crappy framerates and crappy frame generation for the next 3 months to a year , either that or go buy a 5090

You do realize that PS5 also uses frame generation in Wilds? And I pretty vividly remember how there were lots of complains and concerns about PS5's performance during the last beta, so saying its only PC is total bs.

Bottom line is that the engine they've made the game with simply wasn't the best choice for this title (and DD2), and due to that its taxing on all platforms. On PS5 if you wanna play on 60fps then you will be upscaling the game from 1080p and even then it might not be a stable 60fps. Hell, even the 30fps resolution mode is not native 4K and instead upscaled.

[Terry86]

Zenkaiboost Kekkei Genkai lähetti viestin:

MangoMan305 lähetti viestin:

Enjoy your PSSR shimmering/artifacting galore to maintain 60 fps. As if that CPU can even maintain 60 fps in certain spots

it can and it will, witcher 3 runs and looks fantastic on the pro, and so does spiderman 2, and forbidden west.

it's on PC where all these games run like ♥♥♥♥.


and btw all these games I mentioned look 3 times better than Wilds.

Yeap, Ps5 pro is pretty much a 7800xt or between 4070 super. due to optimiztion & not running ♥♥♥♥ like windows.

For the price of graphica card + good cpu & ram/new mother board now, it's a good pick simply cuz pc graphic card price is out of control.

Nvidia isn't really a graphica card company anymore, it's an AI chip company that sells graphic card on the side but you need to pay $$ since they make 3-5x more profit using same wafer for AI chips & they feel like they are doing charity for selling you an over price graphic card.

The last few years graphic card only got marginally better but it's being carried by DLSS & frame gen alike, since ps5 has it's own frame gen now. it will be better optimized for all the games comes on it, unlike pcs where you have to wait for the driver supports.

[Hampster-Style]

runs buttery here on Ultra/RT maxed[imgur.com] even on win10 despite its limitations with DirectStorage 1.2 (no IOBypass).
This game really wants at least an 8-core CPU.

[Kriya Takagi]

its getting to the point where as much as people dog on console gaming for all these newer games it seems that consoles are beginning to become the cheaper alliterative choice to go to. where it used to be that pc was the more cost effective route but with graphics cards and cpu's needed now its pc that has become the premium cost for performance nowadays that even people with higher spec rigs even still seem to have performance issues with newer games.
this is just an observation over the years of many post complaining about top spec rigs having less than stellar performance.
so honestly i can not fault anyone who chooses to go the console route with all the problems and issues people have been griping about with their powerful rigs. its not really painting a good look for pc gaming if even the most expensive setup is having such a hard time playing newer games. again this is just an observation from multiple post of those with high spec rigs complaining about how terrible the performance of games today have been on them. the optics in a sense kinda leading consoles being abit more favorable. wont be the best in performance but vs the cost of a high end rig and people still saying games run terrible on them i dont think new people who are wanting to get into pc gaming are seeing the trade off being worth the cost.

i perfer pc over console but i can see why people might opt for console over pc.

[Leodagan]

Any feedback since the game launched? I am in the same position: PC (running 3080ti) or PS5 pro...