Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
What that means is, you could throw lots of money at a new GPU and not see big performance increases, especially in a game like MH Wilds.
So your options are either: go big on a GPU and start saving for a CPU/Motherboard upgrade in the next year/two.
Or, go mid on a GPU and save a couple hundred bucks, put it towards the next PC in 3-4 years time.
Though, looking at Part Picker GPU prices right now kinda suck (at least in America, I don't know your location), I would recommend a 7800XT but they're nearly $100 over what I paid for it 6 months ago.
Current Nvidia release is kinda dead in the water, paper launches and "eh" performance, Next gen Radeon cards coming in March but that's probably a paper launch too and seems like it could be a disappointing launch as well.
Ngl, might just be time to sit tight and wait for better deals.
if you can afford one then a 5800x3d would be even better and probably good for a 4070 ti super, 4080 etc
the higher the resolution you game at, the less the cpu matters.
at 1080p youre going to hit a cpu bottleneck at some point.
I seceond that. Your suggestion is very reasonable. This game has higher CPU dependancy and higher vram usage. Not sure if both cases are designed for lowering GPU requirement but more vram usage for certain higher praphic settings, which make no sense to me specially for those nvidia 3060 or 70 and 4060 users are suffering similar problems. Stick to 1080p gaming is the best suggestion. AM4 CPU with 3060 or 4060 for 1440p? I really do not think so.
AM5 mother boards are not that expensive and ddr5 memory. There are some decent CPUs that you can choose, if you want to upgrade and play 1440p gaming. For GPU, I still do not belive nvidia is providing any meaningful driver, so you can wait and see how things will go after the release to have more objective comparison.
5700X3D on the other hand is a much reasonable option for those who are still on AM4 platform. Its a bit weaker than 5800X3D but not all that much. Not sure if upgrading either of these make sense for OP though since they have 5800X. Probably better to use it until platform change.
And what do you personally get for the outcome of 5700x3D for 1440p benchmark?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3422117028
With framegen
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3422117402
yeah i agree the 5700x3d would be good.
the v cache makes the difference really.
but im sticking with my 5700x personally. i feel it still has legs.
op has a 5800x which should still be good when paired with a 4070/ti/super etc
interesting your framegen results.
when i used framegen i got lower fps on average.
you would think it would double the fps upto my fps cap (set as 117fps in nvidia control panel for gsync purposes) but it got nowhere near that, often being 10fps lower than without fg on
I'm hesitant to recommend the 7800x3d because it is still quite expensive. Even the new gen non x3d CPUs are cheaper, like the 9700X. On the intel side, 14600K is a good option.
It only leaves you with 300 for a new GPU which nowadays gets you not much better than "a waste of silicon".
oh yeah 4070ti super such a great piece you have. But I somewhat believe, you will even get better results after the release.
4070super is also capable for 1440p gaming with 5800x3d.
The real questions are 4060 and 4060ti, both of which seems really underperforming.