Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
In the end though, it is something that you will have to decide for yourself. :)
sure. but there are so many varibles with this stuff, and if you're not an expert its quite hard, so i try to get as much advice as possible.
Not the Ti or Ti Super ?
Your "local computer assembly guy" basically just wants to sell you stuff, if you ask me, because claiming "it would be a huge performance upgrade" is debatable.
CPU Intense Tasks (1080p)
https://pc-builds.com/bottleneck-calculator/result/10p1fl/2/cpu-intense-tasks/1920x1080/
GPU Intense Tasks (1080p)
https://pc-builds.com/bottleneck-calculator/result/10p1fl/3/gpu-intense-tasks/1920x1080/
CPU Intense Tasks (1440p)
https://pc-builds.com/bottleneck-calculator/result/10p1fl/2/cpu-intense-tasks/2560x1440/
GPU Intense Tasks (1440p)
https://pc-builds.com/bottleneck-calculator/result/10p1fl/3/gpu-intense-tasks/2560x1440/
In short;
At 1080p (especially with CPU heavy games) you are definitely running into a noticeable bottleneck.
I would suggest going for 1440p at least, you will still have a slight bottleneck (with cpu heavy games) but it's not "as bad".
Cyberpunk 2077 Benchmark at 1080p (NOT counting in any sort of bottleneck);
On ultra settings NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 can achieve from 70.1 FPS up to 106.2 FPS , with average around 85.5 FPS.
On ultra settings NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 can achieve from 87.1 FPS up to 134.1 FPS , with average around 107.7 FPS.
Again, that's without any sort of bottleneck - so if you ask me the fps difference isn't that great/worth the price.
If you can afford it, I would rather upgrade to an AM5 motherboard, get the Ryzen 7 7800X3D + 32GB RAM DDR5-6000.
And then later on worry about upgrading your GPU.
You are CPU bound, & upgrading your GPU will only boost your fps to a certain degree.
"You are CPU bound, & upgrading your GPU will only boost your fps to a certain degree"
-the question is to what degree roughly, i'm not really aiming for more than 60fps for most games i play. the only games i play at higher refreshrates are shooters, but that was never a problem. last ones i played was doom eternal and maybe valorant and those ran perfect at 120hz since they are really good optimised for higher refresh rates.
Regarding your other question;
It's tough to give you an exact number (hence you're CPU bound in most cases).
The 4070 is roughly 15% faster (depending on your resolution etc), but hence you're CPU bound you won't be able to utilize it's full potential anyway (in most cases).
I'd suggest you check some youtube videos "rtx 3060 vs 4060" to give you a rough idea, like this one;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVr9tJoDdQ
Again, if you ask me it's not worth the upgrade unless you don't care about the money and/or you REALLY need those 10-20 more fps.
It will be an increase, but it's a bad idea because you will be forced to upgrade again due to the limited VRAM on that GPU.
12GB VRAM will be an issue sooner, rather than later and that's because developers keep releasing broken games such as this one -- the one you are trying to upgrade to play better.
A GPU with less than 16GB VRAM is not going to last you 2-3 years at the rate these games are gobbling it up with their poor coding and lazy dev teams.