20k Benchmark score with 4 year old Middling setup

[Osamaru]

I feel like a lot of people complaining about the requirements/benchmark results are either heavily bottlenecked somewhere they're not aware of, or have unrealistic expectations.

I'm running a pretty mid-range, 4 year old setup right now, and I STILL easily hit 60fps and over a 20k benchmark score on High settings. I get everyone want's to run 120fps at 4080, on Ultra, but if you've comp isn't running absolute top of the line, its foolish to expect something like that.

SCORE - 20197
59.44 FPS (lowest was 55 during the sandstorm, while mostly ran 65-70)
Resolution - 1920x1080
CPU - Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700K CPU @ 3.80GHz
GPU - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
RAM - 16GB

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/339501114040778752/1336795176768897085/image.png?ex=67a51b06&is=67a3c986&hm=56edc4f386845637f20917083f3cb7876eec52b6b1c5fa75b26bb32404ecc4b0

[Oliviertjuhh]

1080p...

[Furia]

dlss yikes

[del_bosque_dol]

Originally posted by Oliviertjuhh:

1080p...

3060ti for 1080p gaming and even 3070ti has the same problem, But I fully understand what OP wrote, and I had a similar PC, which was terrible during the 1st beta. So achieving 60fps at 1080p for 3060ti clearly shows some improvements.

[GamingWithSilvertail]

Originally posted by Oliviertjuhh:

1080p...

You expect a 3060 Ti to play heavy games on 1440 smoothly? :/

Originally posted by del_bosque_dol:

Originally posted by Oliviertjuhh:

1080p...

3060ti for 1080p gaming and even 3070ti has the same problem, But I fully understand what OP wrote, and I had a similar PC, which was terrible during the 1st beta. So achieving 60fps at 1080p for 3060ti clearly shows some improvements.

Didnt have much problems at all with my 3060 Ti on a ryzne 3600 at 1080p during first beta but I dont push my settings to the max cause thats not a high end card

[RotGoblin]

I really do think people have unrealistic expectations.

I think it's possible that this is the first time people are encountering a CPU bottleneck, or are aware of it for the first time? (to which I ask, did you not play World? because dang that thing ate CPU's too).

I honestly think there must be some angry streamers/youtubers out there spreading falsities and misrepresenting scenarios and people just gobble that crap up.

[Wild]

3060 ti is a 1080p GPU nowadays. It has always been midrange, it has a 6 in the middle of the model number...

[RotGoblin]

Originally posted by Wild:

3060 ti is a 1080p GPU nowadays. It has always been midrange, it has a 6 in the middle of the model number...

It was barely a 1440p card when it came out. I would know, I owned one.

[parent child bowl]

The benchmark scores are worthless. Average fps are artificially pushed by cutscenes and the desert biome.

There is a significant difference in performance between the biomes.

[Kaminoken]

Originally posted by Osamaru:

I feel like a lot of people complaining about the requirements/benchmark results are either heavily bottlenecked somewhere they're not aware of, or have unrealistic expectations.

I'm running a pretty mid-range, 4 year old setup right now, and I STILL easily hit 60fps and over a 20k benchmark score on High settings. I get everyone want's to run 120fps at 4080, on Ultra, but if you've comp isn't running absolute top of the line, its foolish to expect something like that.

SCORE - 20197
59.44 FPS (lowest was 55 during the sandstorm, while mostly ran 65-70)
Resolution - 1920x1080
CPU - Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700K CPU @ 3.80GHz
GPU - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
RAM - 16GB

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/339501114040778752/1336795176768897085/image.png?ex=67a51b06&is=67a3c986&hm=56edc4f386845637f20917083f3cb7876eec52b6b1c5fa75b26bb32404ecc4b0

I got this on my 3070

Score: 24144
Average: 70.63
Resolution: 2560x1440
Graphics: High
Cpu: ryzen 7 5700x3d 8-cores
GPU: Rtx 3070
Ram: 32gb

I used dlss. But I didn't think it was too awlfull.

Edit: I get around 29k on 1080p

[RotGoblin]

Originally posted by Kaminoken:

I got this on my 3070

Score: 24144
Average: 70.63
Resolution: 2560x1440
Graphics: High
Cpu: ryzen 7 5700x3d 8-cores
GPU: Rtx 3070
Ram: 32gb

I used dlss. But I didn't think it was too awlfull.

5700X3D doing some baller lifting there, good processor, makes all the difference

[NeoX]

Just finished my Testrun and i have to say, they did optimise the performance quite impressive. Even raytracing does not impact the performance much. But i have to agree its a CPU depending game for sure.

Here is my test and results:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uricga09EA


Average Frames Native Maximum Settings Raytracing = 80,85fps
Average Frames FSR/Gen Maximum Settings Raytracing = 162,54fps
Average Frames Native Maximum Settings NO Raytracing = 89,58fps
Average Frames FSR/Gen Maximum Settings NO Raytracing = 174,4fps

Average Frames Native Medium Settings Raytracing = 92,81fps
Average Frames FSR/Gen Medium Settings Raytracing = 191,02fps
Average Frames Native Medium Settings NO Raytracing = 99,7fps
Average Frames FSR/Gen Medium Settings NO Raytracing = 199,32fps

Average Frames Native Medium Settings Raytracing = 99,13fps
Average Frames FSR/Gen Medium Settings Raytracing = 197,97fps
Average Frames Native Medium Settings NO Raytracing = 103,85fps
Average Frames FSR/Gen Medium Settings NO Raytracing = 211,72fps

[Lord Commander Dante]

Originally posted by Osamaru:

I feel like a lot of people complaining about the requirements/benchmark results are either heavily bottlenecked somewhere they're not aware of, or have unrealistic expectations.

I'm running a pretty mid-range, 4 year old setup right now, and I STILL easily hit 60fps and over a 20k benchmark score on High settings. I get everyone want's to run 120fps at 4080, on Ultra, but if you've comp isn't running absolute top of the line, its foolish to expect something like that.

SCORE - 20197
59.44 FPS (lowest was 55 during the sandstorm, while mostly ran 65-70)
Resolution - 1920x1080
CPU - Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700K CPU @ 3.80GHz
GPU - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
RAM - 16GB

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/339501114040778752/1336795176768897085/image.png?ex=67a51b06&is=67a3c986&hm=56edc4f386845637f20917083f3cb7876eec52b6b1c5fa75b26bb32404ecc4b0

Cutscenes push your fps into a high score terriroty.
Strictly game performance will give you an entirely different result should the entire benchmark was a 100% gameplay testing.

[Bum]

Originally posted by del_bosque_dol:

Originally posted by Oliviertjuhh:

1080p...

3060ti for 1080p gaming and even 3070ti has the same problem, But I fully understand what OP wrote, and I had a similar PC, which was terrible during the 1st beta. So achieving 60fps at 1080p for 3060ti clearly shows some improvements.

This is not a beta tho. This is a benchmark tool. With no combat, with lengthy cinematics and empty areas. On top of that the tool is giving you an average that was pumped by all the cinematics. The game is still unoptimized and will run worse than world. This fps is outrageous at best.

[ferretrun]

I saw some benchmarks with RTX 3060 in 1440p.
Was stuck native around @35fps, not even crossing 40fps, that's pretty weak even for a 4 year old graphics card nowadays.

[RotGoblin]

Originally posted by ferretrun:

I saw some benchmarks with RTX 3060 in 1440p.
Was stuck native around @35fps, not even crossing 40fps, that's pretty weak even for a 4 year old graphics card nowadays.

..A 4 year old bottom tier GPU.