benchmark is a lie!

[Your CEO, our choice]

ok so real talk the bench mark is just walking around theres no gameplay of actually fighting a monster and its only the desert plains imagine the performance in the scarlet forest this makes me scared and i think capcom is scared

[KingOfFriedChicken]

Idk, preformed pretty much the same as I saw in the beta, and the beta played well for me 2070 pulling average 53 FPS it says, but I saw highs up to 75fps, the town seems to be the dragon down to 50s so not a major issue, I don't hunt in town rofl

[metalon]

Why is nobody talkking about engine failing to render proper assets like in cyberpunk? fps counter is a LIE (framegen smearing) and TAA + FXAA smearing makes the game not just running but also looking like absolute trash.

5600X / 32GB / RX 6900 XT : no smear averages around 69fps and with the smears on is like 120 but i don't care really

[SHOKK♥]

Dratinni eredeti hozzászólása:

the fact i hit 60fps consistently with a 2080 is surprising

That's because your GPU is barely doing anything
Your CPU is carrying as the game is extremely heavy on it. There is so much GPU headroom.

[CaptainFluffyPants]

Think I'm gonna hold off, something smelling a little fishy with this one. I still got Sunbreak I picked up on sale and I'm working through MHS 2. I'm on older hardware so I never expected to get amazing performance on high settings, but its bothering me they're not showing combat in the benchmark, which is like 90% of the game and it's where performance matters most.

[GamingWithSilvertail]

Soji eredeti hozzászólása:

GamingWithSilvertail eredeti hozzászólása:

Because the combat isnt the most intensive part. I dont think it matters much at all tbh.

Yeah sure, lots of things happening on the screen, but during the beta you where in town regardless of how many people where there you where going to have a much lower performance then fighting a monster in beta.

I just don't see how this can be true when performance has always dipped with kushala

Did you even play the first beta?

The fps drops where caused by envirmont. In town it was litterally way less FPS then in combat.

It's also the same for DD2 fyi.

Also you nitpicked a event from world that is litterally on a different game engine and I bet you didnt play it with a mere 960 cause you youi couldnt run it smoothly at all above lowest settings

[d k'n n'd'noarf]

The_Freeman eredeti hozzászólása:

if Dragon's Dogma 2 is any indication, don't count on it improving performance anytime soon sadly.
And yeah adjusting settings can only get you so far, it's heavily CPU bound, just like DD2.

Is barely using Cpu at all . I have a Ryzen 3800x and the only time i see the cpu % going over 30% is when is loading up the benchmark run than the whole run the max utitilization is 33% the whole time . Gpu depending on what settings and if using Framegen or not goes from 100% without FG to max 85% with FG and a ton of ghosting because FG usage is not being a cruth to get 60fps . Needs to be Optimized asap . They need to stop forcing people to use DX 12 only instead of having DX 11 and Vulkan as optional API instead of DX12 that keeps being garbage . I know my Gpu can't be the holy grail forever but somehow this runs wrost than DD2 in my personal experience . I have a 1080 Ti.

[tigs]

Your CEO, our choice eredeti hozzászólása:

to the people saying "OH MAN YOURE PCS ARE BAD!" dude i ahve a 4070 and amd 5800x 32 gb of RAM wdym! do i gotta max out credit card to get a super monster pc just to play this game well???????

Yes.

[tigs]

So... 7800X3D ok?

[ekodas]

MP eredeti hozzászólása:

Praying to the gods that Capcom doesn't ram this franchise into the ground with that title.
No matter how good your rig is, this is an unoptimzed mess of an engine.
I am seriously worried.

when world launched on steam (first pc port for a mh game) it was a mess, but look at it now, it is a banger and run really well.
Even if wild struggle at launch I have 0 worries that it will be a great game
But you can hold off and not play it day 1, wait a bit for some patches or mod, even wait for a steam sale but that will probably be next christmas

[KingOfFriedChicken]

tigs eredeti hozzászólása:

So... 7800X3D ok?

Hasn't that bin one of the most popular gold standard CPUs for Luke years? Cuz pretty affordable and prefroms well haha

Yeah it's more then sufficient to play the game.

[⎝⧹Za Furan⧸⎠]

The benchmark is indeed a trap.
Cutscenes where the fps raise a lot increasing the score "artificially", the one in the ship at first and the supper at the end.
No jungle/forest biome benchmark, anyone who have played enough games know that vegetation is one of the most GPU intensive things in games.
No city/settlement benchmark, cities with al lot of buildings and NPCs rendered are also one of the most GPU intensive things.
No combat.
The benchmark said my score was "Excellent" hahaha, no. I had several drops below 60 fps including momentary drops to 45 or so...

[Akryte]

ShadowlessNexus eredeti hozzászólása:

Your CEO, our choice eredeti hozzászólása:

ok so real talk the bench mark is just walking around theres no gameplay of actually fighting a monster and its only the desert plains imagine the performance in the scarlet forest this makes me scared and i think capcom is scared

I know. the funny part is even just walking around the frames dropped harder than the sickest beat I've ever heard in my life.(I made this joke in my rant post lol).

the benchmark shows nothing that's actually going to be happening in game. the bare minimum. and it still. rocks that 30fps in some areas like the town. ...

on my 7800xt.


at 1080p LOW.

5600x cpu btw don't even bother telling me its too weak. cyberpunk with fsr3 mod is 240fps 1440p ultra/high with some dips.

ur 7800XT is cooked i'm running the game at 144fps ultra 2k

[OtakuBrony]

I am skeptical about the benchmarks. According to the minimum Requirements it seems like my PC should be up to co to run it 60-120 FPS like the other MH games I do have, but it didn't.
Average FPS: 29.38
Graphics Settings: High
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-core Processor
GPU: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
RAM: 32 GB

Minimum requirements is from a build that would be optimized for PC Parts that was released 6 years ago which matches my current specs.
Also, I had a strange warning that I was using too much RAM and it could cause glitches. The first time I tried to launch the benchmark, it completely crashed. The second attempt was fine, but that message still popped up.

[KingOfFriedChicken]

OtakuBrony eredeti hozzászólása:

I am skeptical about the benchmarks. According to the minimum Requirements it seems like my PC should be up to co to run it 60-120 FPS like the other MH games I do have, but it didn't.
Average FPS: 29.38
Graphics Settings: High
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-core Processor
GPU: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
RAM: 32 GB

Minimum requirements is from a build that would be optimized for PC Parts that was released 6 years ago which matches my current specs.
Also, I had a strange warning that I was using too much RAM and it could cause glitches. The first time I tried to launch the benchmark, it completely crashed. The second attempt was fine, but that message still popped up.

Yeah drop it from high probably 1080p as well, you won't be getting 60fps on high with that while pushing higher settings on a cpu that is the minimum recommended. But it will play if you fiddle with settings some and lower them.

[Will it Blend]

Have, have you never seen a benchmarking tool for a game before?
Usually thry are even simpler than this, this is actually one of the surprisingly more sophisticated game benchmarks.

That said, fighting a monster is going to have better FPS than your "just walking around" FPS, because instead of lots of different creatures in a wide open area youll mostly be arena fighting a singular up to a handful of monsters, which is significantly lighter on the rendering.

Combat FX do not take a lot of processing, most of them are incredible simple effects