Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
On my ultrawide monitor which has 3440x1440p, and your settings, I get a score of 18971 which gives me 55.39 fps on average on the final score. But considering the beginning cutscene tanks the benchmark results, I was easily seeing 60+ fps throughout different parts of the game.
On my same monitor, using 2560x1080, I get a score of 23242, which averages about 67.87. Only problem here is the screen looks like someone slathered Vaseline on the entirety of the screen. Certainly not appealing as it hurts my eyes.
On my second monitor, which is a 2560x1440p monitor, I get a score of 21459, which averages about 62.72 FPS. Great clarity as it used to be my main gaming monitor for 4 years before getting an UW.
Overall, the game is perfectly playable to me. I do think this optimization is much better than the beta, because I was getting about 40-45 FPS on average. So hitting 60 is just fine for me. Thanks for the settings. It is an improvement. Especially considering this is all without DLSS upscaling. Using native res is pretty rad.
Glad to hear it helped!
cpu: 5700X3D
I tried your specs and my score is 27,697 with FPS 81.12 fps
Then I tried with ulta settings everything on highest (when you pick ultra some options still stay on high so I turn them to highest also), variable rate shading OFF, FSR on native AA with frame gen.
Score is 17,285 with FPS 101.22
In my opinion FSR native AA with framegen looks better than %85 render rate tweaked settings. I took some SS and compared them. I didnt noticed any artifacts and blurriness. Suprisingly it works pretty well.
I recommend you to give it a try. It looks better and gives you higher fps.
I disagree, I even stated so in the OP.
Render scale 85% just leaves a mildly softer image that is barely noticeable.
I find FSR/DLSS artifacts EXTREMELY noticeable.
I mean, my settings with Render rate 100, Native FSR and Frame Gen would quite possibly net more performance.
But if it looks better for you! Great! We still learned something.
You're welcome!
Using a 7900XT and 7900X3D with a 3440x1440 monitor. From my benchmarks i am able to consistently get a score over 20k and my low fps seems to come from a few frames of cut scenes (was using high) and entering the village. I am using the AMD software to limit my FPS to 60.
I might be able to push for higher settings if i adjust the resolution down to 2560x1440, or less stress/more stable using similar settings.
Happy Hunting!
No worries, hope it helps!!