Games in 2025

[҉ Gabor]

Looks worse than MH: World (6 years old game), and runs at half as much fps. But hey, atleast you guys gave us a benchmark, so there would be no surprises on full release, so props to you .

[RotGoblin]

Where does this "looks worse than World" thing come from?

Has some Youtuber or Twitch influencer been saying that or something?

Because whilst looks are down to personal perspective, Wilds is clearly graphically superior to World, though a much muter colour palette.

[Dark Lord Insidious]

In no universe does Worlds look better than this.... sorry but it's just not true, go back and play it, you will instantly regret what you said....

[Mechanique]

When your PC is ♥♥♥♥, games in 2025 will run like ♥♥♥♥
Who could have guessed?

[Bunuffin]

The cope of fanboys is amazing and entertaining to see, a bunch of smooth-brain finding excuses for their invested interests...
Most of them have no inner thought and asking them a conditional hypothetical would be truly peak entertainment if it wasn't for the fact that their vote count as much as yours.

Hope is that their frontal cortex in not fully developed yet, but that hope is wishful thinking.

[҉ Gabor]

Originally posted by Goblin:

Where does this "looks worse than World" thing come from?

Has some Youtuber or Twitch influencer been saying that or something?

Because whilst looks are down to personal perspective, Wilds is clearly graphically superior to World, though a much muter colour palette.

Don't know why, it's like Rise. The textures were not THAT bad in that game either, but the details, effects, and everything was just dogsh!t tier (because of the Switch, probably, they made it for that hardware). This one is not that bad, but it is worse than World, as far as i can tell, in every visual aspect. So there is no logical reason why it runs so poorly.

[Níðhöggr]

Come on, wilds looks better than world. But it's way too taxing on both CPU and GPU indicating a lack of optimisations.

But why does it look so bad when tuned down? Because of TAA (blur) and the usage of upscaling (another source of blur because of low resolution). FSR and DLSS uses internally TAA to remove aliasing.

[Doson・ザ・ロリ好き紳士]

Originally posted by Goblin:

Where does this "looks worse than World" thing come from?

Has some Youtuber or Twitch influencer been saying that or something?

Because whilst looks are down to personal perspective, Wilds is clearly graphically superior to World, though a much muter colour palette.

You're honestly telling me you think this looks good?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3421662905

Originally posted by Mechanique:

When your PC is ♥♥♥♥, games in 2025 will run like ♥♥♥♥
Who could have guessed?

Nah, the game looks bad no matter what settings you're running at. Stop telling people their PCs are bad, when it's clear the game is the problem.

[denton91]

Originally posted by ҉ Gabor:

Originally posted by Goblin:

Where does this "looks worse than World" thing come from?

Has some Youtuber or Twitch influencer been saying that or something?

Because whilst looks are down to personal perspective, Wilds is clearly graphically superior to World, though a much muter colour palette.

Don't know why, it's like Rise. The textures were not THAT bad in that game either, but the details, effects, and everything was just dogsh!t tier (because of the Switch, probably, they made it for that hardware). This one is not that bad, but it is worse than World, as far as i can tell, in every visual aspect. So there is no logical reason why it runs so poorly.

Rise was an obvious switch port. Wilds doesn't look worse than world.

[brand damage]

This coulda been made on the same engine as World was. It has no business needing new hardware *while looking exactly the same*

[RotGoblin]

Originally posted by Doson・ザ・ロリ好き紳士:

Originally posted by Goblin:

Where does this "looks worse than World" thing come from?

Has some Youtuber or Twitch influencer been saying that or something?

Because whilst looks are down to personal perspective, Wilds is clearly graphically superior to World, though a much muter colour palette.

You're honestly telling me you think this looks good?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3421662905

It doesn't, but you clearly have distance blur on.

I also doubt that's 1440p native, looks more like 720p to me.

[Doson・ザ・ロリ好き紳士]

Originally posted by Goblin:

Originally posted by Doson・ザ・ロリ好き紳士:

You're honestly telling me you think this looks good?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3421662905

It doesn't, but you clearly have distance blur on.

I also doubt that's 1440p native, looks more like 720p to me.

It literally is 1440p, I set the setting to ultra, and turned upscaling off. I changed nothing else. Do I need to make a video? Would you like that? I'll do it if you ask.

I DID run the benchmark in 720 btw. I looks MUCH worse than this.

[Laciel]

Originally posted by goblin darts:

This coulda been made on the same engine as World was. It has no business needing new hardware *while looking exactly the same*

Capcom mandated REngine use for this and other games.

[RotGoblin]

Originally posted by Doson・ザ・ロリ好き紳士:

It literally is 1440p, I set the setting to ultra, and turned upscaling off. I changed nothing else. Do I need to make a video? Would you like that? I'll do it if you ask.

Well you have Framegen on (I can tell from the score) which means presumably you have FSR/DLSS on as well.

[Laciel]

Originally posted by Doson・ザ・ロリ好き紳士:

You're honestly telling me you think this looks good?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3421662905

Nah, the game looks bad no matter what settings you're running at. Stop telling people their PCs are bad, when it's clear the game is the problem.

I have ryzen 7 7700, RX 7900XT, 32Gb RAM at 5600Mhz, M.2 SSD and the benchmark on High preset (no frame gen) had 58ish FPS in that same spot at 3440x1440 resolution.
EDIT:
To get the benchmark at 60FPS at all times i had to drop shadows to medium, FSR to balanced and some other stuff to medium (but idk if that even did anything). With those settings i managed to get 66 FPS in that spot which is still low.
Once you start hunting there will be more effects during the battle, more players, more NPCs and it the absolute BEST result was 66FPS with NOTHING going on then you are looking at <50FPS during a fight.
EDIT 2: Your CPU is 6-core which is probably the bottleneck here.

[Doson・ザ・ロリ好き紳士]

Originally posted by Goblin:

Originally posted by Doson・ザ・ロリ好き紳士:

It literally is 1440p, I set the setting to ultra, and turned upscaling off. I changed nothing else. Do I need to make a video? Would you like that? I'll do it if you ask.

Well you have Framegen on (I can tell from the score) which means presumably you have FSR/DLSS on as well.

Disabling upscaling disables framegen. I get over 100fps with frame gen on. Why do you all keep saying this? I literally told you, this is native ultra. The fact that you can't believe this is just proving my point that the game looks terrible.

My score with upscaling on was 23245 at 136 average fps. Without upscaling it was 23872 with 70fps average.