Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yeah i would recommend at least a Zen 8 core cpu like the PS5 has for the console like 30 fps medium settings expereince.
I did many tests and collected some data around here and i can assure you, its in 80% of all cases the CPu that sets the performance level for you and in 2nd place your GPU's VRAM.
Here my test:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uricga09EA
Beta performance for reference:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIWjgo88_WI
Core numbers:
Average Frames Native Maximum Settings Raytracing = 80,85fps
Average Frames FSR/Gen Maximum Settings Raytracing = 162,54fps
Average Frames Native Maximum Settings NO Raytracing = 89,58fps
Average Frames FSR/Gen Maximum Settings NO Raytracing = 174,4fps
Average Frames Native Medium Settings Raytracing = 92,81fps
Average Frames FSR/Gen Medium Settings Raytracing = 191,02fps
Average Frames Native Medium Settings NO Raytracing = 99,7fps
Average Frames FSR/Gen Medium Settings NO Raytracing = 199,32fps
Average Frames Native Minimum Settings Raytracing = 99,13fps
Average Frames FSR/Gen Minimum Settings Raytracing = 197,97fps
Average Frames Native Minimum Settings NO Raytracing = 103,85fps
Average Frames FSR/Gen Minimum Settings NO Raytracing = 211,72fps
As you can see the difference between highest and lowest settings is just around 20 fps what speaks a lot for a CPU bottleneck. That i do not have laggs or super bad-frame drops is given why the high amoung of CPU cores (12>8) that my system has.
So i can only repeat myself that the CPU is the base performance factor in this game.
2nd in place is the VRAM. In all my tests it was always around 10-11GB of VRAm usage and that in 1080P. You can find some reports in this forum of RTX4060(ti) users where the difference between the 8 and 16GB VRAM models, are over 60% difference in frame amounts.
So yeah, priority one is the CPU and in 2nd place GPU with solid VRAM amount.
Game is eating cpu with more than enough other stuff like economic simulation.
@OP
If we only consider monster hunter wilds a cpu update won't do that much on its own, imo.
if you do upgrade and don't want to buy a new whole new motherboard and ram you should be able to get a 5800x3d into your current rig which is a solid upgrade and still a good chip.