Monster Hunter Wilds

Monster Hunter Wilds

View Stats:
Isn't it PATHETIC that ER Nightreign will have 5x-10x more content than Wilds, and only for $40?
Both are coop focused. Both are action games. Both are focused on grinding. Not only will Nightreign have more content at launch than Wilds in the next 3 years, but you won't need to wait an addtional 2 years and pay $50 to have challenging content. IMAGINE that.

Nightreign - $40
Wilds - $70😆Nata's story was worth the price tag, says the game director.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxNScPiBkGk
Last edited by Hardwenzen; May 2 @ 3:36pm
< >
Showing 1-15 of 81 comments
Old Madao (Banned) May 2 @ 3:44pm 
isnt it weird same ppl just try to look for reason to trashtalk wild? just quit and be gone for good
Isn’t pathetic that people such as yourself create ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ just to earn jester awards?
2D神 May 2 @ 4:26pm 
Originally posted by Old Madao:
isnt it weird same ppl just try to look for reason to trashtalk wild? just quit and be gone for good

Just wait it out. Sooner and later there will be a game that is the next hot thing and haters will migrate there.
Living in a world where 200 hours of gameplay isn't worth $70 is crazy (it's actually worth $60, but still good content!)
Dagný (Banned) May 2 @ 4:50pm 
What's really pathetic is FS making Fortnite Elden Ring.
Dan May 2 @ 4:52pm 
Originally posted by Matt & the Cat:
Isn’t pathetic that people such as yourself create ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ just to earn jester awards?

You need to really sell just how pathetic these people actually are. I don't think there's anybody close enough to this person to get them the help they actually need.
DaBa May 2 @ 4:57pm 
Yeah, and I would still rather play Wilds than any more of Elden Ring, even though it's so far my least favourite MH game. There is only so much left and right clicking you can do you know.
L:D May 2 @ 4:58pm 
Originally posted by 2D神:
Originally posted by Old Madao:
isnt it weird same ppl just try to look for reason to trashtalk wild? just quit and be gone for good

Just wait it out. Sooner and later there will be a game that is the next hot thing and haters will migrate there.
We already had like Khazan and Expedition 33, both much better than wilds. But wilds is so disappointing that they come back here because it is still hilarious and people gave them awards. So it's pretty much win/win.

Also, protecting wilds from this is incredible easy. But it's funny, now i understand why people protect wilds so much, they simple don't play anything else.
Originally posted by Hardwenzen:
Both are coop focused. Both are action games. Both are focused on grinding. Not only will Nightreign have more content at launch than Wilds in the next 3 years, but you won't need to wait an addtional 2 years and pay $50 to have challenging content. IMAGINE that.

Nightreign - $40
Wilds - $70😆Nata's story was worth the price tag, says the game director.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxNScPiBkGk

Yeah instead of being a negative nancy I feel like its a win reguardless. Both games are great and hopefully will have a long life cycle. Both are different as well so for someone who digs co-op games like this I'll just enjoy both.
Yagger May 2 @ 4:59pm 
nightreign has nearly no content though
Xaelon May 2 @ 5:00pm 
The thing about Nightreign is....it has no solo experience.

It's 100% designed and build around 3 player coop. The monsters in the game will always have HP, damage and mechanics scaled for three players even if you launch a session solo.

Personally I think the game sounds absolutely miserable to play unless you have two buds to roll with. You know how variable group quality is in MH and Nightreign requires arguably MORE coordination than MH does. Like just watch, the Nightreign steam forums are going to be one big cesspool of people complaining about how "This rando ruined my perfect run WTF!".

I love Fromsoft games but I'm not touching Nightreign unless they actually add a real solo mode.
Originally posted by Old Madao:
isnt it weird same ppl just try to look for reason to trashtalk wild? just quit and be gone for good
because people want this to be a good monster hunter game that gives the new players(which it has been catering to) a good first impression of the franchise.
Old Madao (Banned) May 2 @ 5:07pm 
Originally posted by L:D:
Originally posted by 2D神:

Just wait it out. Sooner and later there will be a game that is the next hot thing and haters will migrate there.
We already had like Khazan and Expedition 33, both much better than wilds. But wilds is so disappointing that they come back here because it is still hilarious and people gave them awards. So it's pretty much win/win.

Also, protecting wilds from this is incredible easy. But it's funny, now i understand why people protect wilds so much, they simple don't play anything else.
khazan is pretty much 45h gameplay for a 60 euro game. 33 was cheap cause company has to make name, and attract more ppl, not saying its bad game its fantastic, but also pretty much 50h gameplay for plat(i wont even mention that you can simple oneshot superboss if you make some broken builds but its w/e) . Those 2 are story games, which you cant play together with your friends like wilds for example, also it depends what you seek overall in games, like if ppl in wilds dont enjoy playing with weapons and they seek some insane challenge god knows why they even seek in in mh genre... but w/e.... than i have no idea why you even keep playing at all any mh. If you dont enjoy combat simple dont play and play something else, its okay to not like something, just no need to whine everyday
Last edited by Old Madao; May 2 @ 5:13pm
Yeah but that game will probably have bugs if you run it past 60fps.

Last edited by Nobody watches your TTV; May 2 @ 5:08pm
5-10x? What's the source for that?

Maybe it's $40 because in fact it doesn't have much content and most of it is literally recycled. In reality you're paying for a new game mode more or less. Elden Ring already recycled a lot of old content. Neightrein will almost exclusively be recycled.
Last edited by lolschrauber; May 2 @ 5:12pm
< >
Showing 1-15 of 81 comments
Per page: 1530 50