Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
nope. not even close. thanks for your input but you're absolutely wrong. THE ONLY things that can oneshot me at 35% are Gravious Railgun, Rau Dao's railgun, Zuo's nova's (his run attack will if it procc's x2), and basically any hit from Gore if I'm frenzied.
Oh and I think Arkveld's ulti /chain smash. Duno about Mitsune's ulti.
In saying that, if I counterslash them, I survive all but the nova and gravios (because they multihit). YES I survive Rau's railgun, at 35% health, with a direct blast.
This is not the discussion; thank for your opinion, but you haven't added anything constructive.
So, for a certainty, you gain the +30% damage, AND you suffer from getting no defense-stat boost, as well, AND you lose the benefits of Iron Will (prevents Defense Down).
So Heroics as a defensive strat is best at level 4.
it may even disable diving blessing and defenderHi
So basically anything worth fighting is going to pwn you off at 35% if it hits you by your own admittance.
You got the rocksteady mantle, you could try that, they recently buffed it.
Using a counter move is not taking the hit directly. In what world do you live in that allows you to believe countering a hit = the same as taking the hit?
You surviving a rail gun from a 5* tempered rey dau with 35% HP left is not happening, maybe if you use the rocksteady mantle.
Thanks again for your input. No, really.
I just tested DefHi meal + Divine Blessing, and they both trigger inside Heroics +5
I'll have to find a Guardian Dogosuma to test Defense:Down but Iron Will may still work. The 'defense negated' may refer specifically to it's own +100 buff at Heroics +4. I read somewhere that in one version of MH:? that Heroics +5 also gave you a +250... but that's unverified, and feels pretty over-tuned (but awesome) IMO.
I can also state that iron will does at this point not seem to help against Frenzy, either - Frenzy does increase your damage taken from attack, but it doesn't do it through 'defense down' so Iron will does nothing. Even Antidote does nothing to mitigate the actual damage - just the length of time that you're under the influence of the downsides of Frenzy.
Mostly just staff that's "good to know"
AH-1 Cobra is correct and he was polite. How can using a counter move be considered surviving?
I hope nobody else helps you, your attitude stinks and your original question is nonsensical. Do you even have friends IRL? Keep yapping to yourself in this thread.
I'm not being 'rude', at least not trying to be.
Look at the conversation again - I was asking a specific question. Namely,
"What does Heroics +5 mean specifically when it says that "Defence Effects are Negated".
Which defence effects? the +100? does ti include other defense skills, such as defense down or Divine blessing?"
Cobra said that any 4* would kill me at that point that is not anything like an answer to the question. I rebutted him stating that he was incorrect and that the only things that kill me are Ultimate's / Nukes - and I can survive most of them if I can hit a counter.
My rebuttal to him was that
1. he did not answer or address the question
2. my personal experience has demonstrated that he was wrong in the reply he did make.
and as for you defending Cobra... if my attitude stinks, then it's not the intention; I just want people who answer a thread, to come in and contribute to the thread. Cobra, did not; and I am more cynical in my old age, so prompting him to GET on topic (he has never actually addressed it directly) and not reply with non-related 'non-sense' as you stated; seems more on-topic than your misguided attack on me thinly veiled as a defense of another netizen, while you, also, have also managed to not actually address the actual topic or question.
Why is that? Are you the same guy, on an alti, trying to troll or bait me?
Is it working?
More importantly; do you have anything to contribute to the QUESTION IN THE OP?