Paywall

[Jyggalad]

Genuinely disgusting to nickle and dime as much as you can on a fully priced game. Paying for emotes is disgusting. Of course whales will eat it up.

[Dae]

Originally posted by GunRunner89X:

Originally posted by Dae:

Got a video with statistics on show, mostly the lows and framepacing? I'm just curious as almost everyone (the ones who are EDIT: dumb brave enough to expose themselves that is) who state "no issues", give video evidence of their gameplay and have issues in their videos. Not like it matters as it's been thoroughly proven by reputable sources anyway, but still.

Then the reviews wouldn't be so mixed would they... Unless you're saying that all the positive reviews are all liars? Even with the positive reviews outnumbering the negative? Yeah, clearly so many people are lying... Now, I'm not so arrogant to say that those posting negative reviews are lying. Quite the opposite. Yeah, there are problems with the game. But all these people coming on here, like you, making out that those who report no issues are clearly lying... and there have been plenty of them... are a little 'out of sync', I think.

Got that video yet? Also, cut the useless positive reviews out and read the ones that are detailed, majority of them are complaining about optimisation.

[GunRunner89X]

Originally posted by Dae:

Originally posted by GunRunner89X:

Then the reviews wouldn't be so mixed would they... Unless you're saying that all the positive reviews are all liars? Even with the positive reviews outnumbering the negative? Yeah, clearly so many people are lying... Now, I'm not so arrogant to say that those posting negative reviews are lying. Quite the opposite. Yeah, there are problems with the game. But all these people coming on here, like you, making out that those who report no issues are clearly lying... and there have been plenty of them... are a little 'out of sync', I think.

Got that video yet? Also, cut the useless positive reviews out and read the ones that are detailed, majority of them are complaining about optimisation.

Don't like logic, do you? "Useless positive reviews". Look at the stats. First month: about 45,000 positive vs 30,000 negative. Every metric since, almost 2:1 positive to negative, some even higher. You are a child. You keep asking for this video, there you go with the arrogance on full display again. No one has to prove anything to you. And why don't you post a video with all these issues you're having? Why don't you prove your side? Seems to me like you want your cake and to eat it too. Pathetic, a child indeed. Good day sir.

[Kiririn]

Tells me I have a 'thick skull' but defends a $70 broken and unfinished game that already has $130 in DLC.

lol

Originally posted by GunRunner89X:

OP complains of a 'paywall' for DLC that is 100% optional and not giving an advantage to anyone who buys it vs those that don't... That is the point, get that through your thick skull. No one is praising anything, except for Capcom having a bit more respect for their customers than Ubisoft for example, who DO operate a pay to win model in their games...

[Casval Zem Daikun]

As someone else pointed out, this is just nu-Crapcum now.
It was pretty apparent to me when they were selling red ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ orbs, of all things, as DLC for DMC5. The fact that character edit vouchers are limited DLC in these games blows my mind. Then they have the nerve to try and ban people who shop edit the vouchers in. Good lord...

[Kiririn]

Calls the visuals in Wilds 'amazing' and then tells us that we need to see an ophthalmologist.

lol

Originally posted by GunRunner89X:

And the visuals are amazing. Maybe book a consultant with an Ophthalmologist?

[GunRunner89X]

Originally posted by Kiririn:

Tells me I have a 'thick skull' but defends a $70 broken and unfinished game that already has $130 in DLC.

lol

Originally posted by GunRunner89X:

OP complains of a 'paywall' for DLC that is 100% optional and not giving an advantage to anyone who buys it vs those that don't... That is the point, get that through your thick skull. No one is praising anything, except for Capcom having a bit more respect for their customers than Ubisoft for example, who DO operate a pay to win model in their games...

Still not getting it... I'm not defending the game, I'm defending the DLC policy that Capcom are using. They're a business, of course they're going to try and squeeze every drop of money from their customers. But there's a big difference between offering DLC which ONLY offers cosmetic options to the game, instead of offering any kind of 'pay to win' options. Someone who doesn't buy the DLC is not missing out on any gameplay versus the person that does buy it. That is the key thing I'm trying to stress here. If Capcom started offering DLC for amours or skills or weapons or monsters, THEN I'd have an issue with them because that is unfair to those that don't buy it.

[Minute Maid Berry Punch⛧]

Originally posted by G O R K:

Do you REALLY need the emotes? Do you enjoy them that much?
-or are you just a klepto that wants everything shiny in the game and got jealous of the fact that people spent their disposable income on something funny?

Do you know what a klepto is?

[Han Daimond]

Emotes aren't really that important, but yeah, would've been nice if they were free or earned through quests.

[zmanbuilder]

That is not a paywall, that is a optional cosmetic.

Still scummy, but not a paywall.

[Kiririn]

You can say emotes, but it's actually emotes, seikret decorations, gestures, hairstyles, stickers, layered armor, tent customization, background music, handler outfits, pendants, camp gear, makeup and face paint, etc.

Originally posted by Han Daimond:

Emotes aren't really that important, but yeah, would've been nice if they were free or earned through quests.

[Dae]

Originally posted by Kiririn:

You can say emotes, but it's actually emotes, seikret decorations, gestures, hairstyles, stickers, layered armor, tent customization, background music, handler outfits, pendants, camp gear, makeup and face paint, etc.

Originally posted by Han Daimond:

Emotes aren't really that important, but yeah, would've been nice if they were free or earned through quests.

They're still charging users to edit their characters too, I believe.

Originally posted by zmanbuilder:

That is not a paywall, that is a optional cosmetic.

Still scummy, but not a paywall.

Most likely what OP meant, to be fair.

[Dae]

Originally posted by GunRunner89X:

So much time spent posting irrelevancy over a simple request of a gameplay vid with stats on show to back up your claim.

[Kiririn]

Yup, that too.

All of that and the game is broken and unfinished. Some people have zero self-respect.

Originally posted by Dae:

Originally posted by Kiririn:

You can say emotes, but it's actually emotes, seikret decorations, gestures, hairstyles, stickers, layered armor, tent customization, background music, handler outfits, pendants, camp gear, makeup and face paint, etc.

They're still charging users to edit their characters too, I believe.

[Parmak]

If you want more free content, events, and Title Updates past what was offered in the base game then this is just how it is. Would you have preferred a battle pass system? The game has a lot of live service elements and servers to run. It does not matter if these are features you particularly like or not, this is the direction the game has taken. Therefore they need to have some way to continuously generate revenue over the games lifespan. The people buying these packs are paying for you to continue receiving the free content updates that drop alongside them.

I don't like MTX either, but it's either this, a subscription fee, or a battlepass with seasons. I think we got the best of the three options here.

[Ottomic]

Originally posted by zmanbuilder:

That is not a paywall, that is a optional cosmetic.

Still scummy, but not a paywall.

Correct. I wish people weren't stupid enough to pay money for Fortnite dances in mohun, but this is just an optional purchase.

Honestly, if you have to make up drama about paid stuff, at least do it over the edit vouchers, not dances.