Monster Hunter Wilds

Monster Hunter Wilds

View Stats:
How is the optimization ?
I know it was ♥♥♥♥ on release - is it better right now ?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 52 comments
Originally posted by eXact:
How is the optimization ?
I know it was ♥♥♥♥ on release - is it better right now ?

It was very good at release. It has been improved twice since then.
Originally posted by eXact:
I know it was ♥♥♥♥ on release - is it better right now ?

Slighty better,

Almost less 1GB of VRAM.
Originally posted by アンジェル:
Originally posted by eXact:
How is the optimization ?
I know it was ♥♥♥♥ on release - is it better right now ?

It was very good at release. It has been improved twice since then.

genuine question, why are you on here shilling for capcom 24/7 lmao, Im certain they arent paying you to do it
Originally posted by Bandit:
Originally posted by アンジェル:

It was very good at release. It has been improved twice since then.

genuine question, why are you on here shilling for capcom 24/7 lmao, Im certain they arent paying you to do it

It loves trolling, indeed
Bunuffin Apr 4 @ 5:34am 
It will always run like ass, they would need to gut the engine to make it run better, they are asking it to do something it is very VERY bad at.

It will run the same after the G rank is completed too, they already said they optimized it as much as they could, take it with crapcom for forcing them to use that engine.

MH is the biggest moneymaking game for campom, i don't understand why they don't make an engine for the game so it can do what they need.
On the other hand trying to understand greedy fart sniffing corpos is an exercise in futility.
Last edited by Bunuffin; Apr 4 @ 5:34am
Originally posted by Bandit:
Originally posted by アンジェル:

It was very good at release. It has been improved twice since then.

genuine question, why are you on here shilling for capcom 24/7 lmao, Im certain they arent paying you to do it

because it got capcoms ♥♥♥♥ deep in its throat
Originally posted by Bunuffin:
It will always run like ass, they would need to gut the engine to make it run better, they are asking it to do something it is very VERY bad at.

It will run the same after the G rank is completed too, they already said they optimized it as much as they could, take it with crapcom for forcing them to use that engine.

MH is the biggest moneymaking game for campom, i don't understand why they don't make an engine for the game so it can do what they need.
On the other hand trying to understand greedy fart sniffing corpos is an exercise in futility.

Doesn't run like ass for me at all. But I also don't have a potato.

i7-13700k
32GB DDR5 RAM
RTX 4070 12GB Super OC Gaming Edition
Kingston Fury 2TB NVMe drive

Was this expensive? Along with the rest of the rig, yes. Will I have to replace this anytime in the near future? No. Can I run things like MHWilds, Stalker 2, Helldivers 2 and others at 1440p at a minimum of 60FPS? Easily. Wilds runs above 100, Stalker is more demanding and tends to dip under 90 in certain situations. Helldivers 2? Flawless.

I dunno why people expect 8-12 year old tech to be able to perform like newer tech. That's not how optimization works. In fact, optimization can only be done to a certain degree. It isn't a friggin cure-all for bad performance on old hardware. My previous rig was WAY out of date:

i7-4690k
16GB DDR3 RAM
RTX 2060 8GB Super ROG STRIX edition

This setup? This could barely run Helldivers 2, and that was with SIGNIFICANTLY lowering everything. Was I mad about it not being able to be played at omgsooperhighgwaffixmaxFPS4k? No. Because that's asinine. I cannot expect a 4th generation rig with minor upgrades to be able to do what a 14th generation-capable rig with minor compromises can do. It's not a proper comparison. One CLEARLY far outpaces the other. In a BIG way.
Last edited by Baklavah; Apr 4 @ 5:52am
Kiririn Apr 4 @ 5:55am 
No it doesn't.

I'm talking of course about frames that can actually accept input. If you turn motion smoothing on you can double the number in the corner but you actually get worse latency.

Originally posted by Baklavah:
Doesn't run like ass for me at all. But I also don't have a potato.

i7-13700k
32GB DDR5 RAM
RTX 4070 12GB Super OC Gaming Edition
Kingston Fury 2TB NVMe drive

Wilds runs above 100
Originally posted by Kiririn:
No it doesn't.

I'm talking of course about frames that can actually accept input. If you turn motion smoothing on you can double the number in the corner but you actually get worse latency.

Originally posted by Baklavah:
Doesn't run like ass for me at all. But I also don't have a potato.

i7-13700k
32GB DDR5 RAM
RTX 4070 12GB Super OC Gaming Edition
Kingston Fury 2TB NVMe drive

Wilds runs above 100

Yes. It does. I have been playing since release. But whatever. Believe what you will. I'm not about to argue with someone who cannot understand what is being said.
Kiririn Apr 4 @ 6:00am 
No it doesn't. Not without frame gen motion smoothing.

My CPU is comparable and my GPU is better. I was nowhere near able to lock 100 fps without motion smoothing.

Originally posted by Baklavah:
Originally posted by Kiririn:
No it doesn't.

I'm talking of course about frames that can actually accept input. If you turn motion smoothing on you can double the number in the corner but you actually get worse latency.

Yes. It does. I have been playing since release. But whatever. Believe what you will. I'm not about to argue with someone who cannot understand what is being said.
Originally posted by Kiririn:
No it doesn't. Not without frame gen motion smoothing.

My CPU is comparable and my GPU is better. I was nowhere near able to lock 100 fps without motion smoothing.

Originally posted by Baklavah:

Yes. It does. I have been playing since release. But whatever. Believe what you will. I'm not about to argue with someone who cannot understand what is being said.

You do realize that your GPU doesn't automatically make everything better, right? The game is heavily CPU dependent. All you've done if your GPU is superior is bottleneck it.
fps wise barely any improvement on my end. was playable before, is playable now. still runs like *ss considering how the game looks.
Kiririn Apr 4 @ 6:03am 
Did you miss the point where I said comparable CPU?

Originally posted by Baklavah:
Originally posted by Kiririn:
No it doesn't. Not without frame gen motion smoothing.

My CPU is comparable and my GPU is better. I was nowhere near able to lock 100 fps without motion smoothing.

You do realize that your GPU doesn't automatically make everything better, right? The game is heavily CPU dependent. All you've done if your GPU is superior is bottleneck it.
Originally posted by Kiririn:
Did you miss the point where I said comparable CPU?

Originally posted by Baklavah:

You do realize that your GPU doesn't automatically make everything better, right? The game is heavily CPU dependent. All you've done if your GPU is superior is bottleneck it.

And yet, I still see 100 fps.

What is your CPU, and what does it top out at?

Mine runs at 5.4 GHz. It runs hot, but it is pretty damn strong considering it's a 13th generation chip.
Last edited by Baklavah; Apr 4 @ 6:07am
Originally posted by eXact:
I know it was ♥♥♥♥ on release - is it better right now ?

It's still not much better. It eats a bit less of your VRAM now, but all in all the overall FPS is the same and stuttering is also still present.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 52 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Apr 4 @ 5:19am
Posts: 52