Game Performance?

[tonicmole]

The game runs really good on my old PC so I'm a little confused at how people are having so many performance issues. I have a Ryzen 7 1800X, 32 GB or memory, and an RTX 2080. My PC is pushing 7 years old. I just put everything on high, set AMD FSR on balanced mode (Never use DLSS. It's entire strategy is to run your game at 720p and call it a day), and frame generation on, and I get about 80-90 FPS. However it ran good out of the box, but I could squeeze more out of it by tweaking the settings myself. I'd say my specs are mid or lower mid for this game, but I haven't tried it on anything else. One last tip, if you're trying to run games at 4K and then turning on DLSS which just downgrades your resolution to 720, then...yeah, don't do that. Just run it at 2K. Having DLSS on with any game at 4K is counterproductive. You can make the game look like mud without "advanced AI",

[Khergit Horse Archer]

the irony telling 4k to not use upscaling when its better to use upscaling at higher res than at lower res is pretty funni

[Kiririn]

Post a video with all the relevant stats on screen. That's the only way to evaluate your performance to other's.

[Ottomic]

I have a Ryzen 5 5600x, 3070, 32 GB of RAM and the game runs like absolute ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.

On medium-low overall settings, with textures on Medium (with the hi-res pack, otherwise textures look like smeared ♥♥♥♥, because I still contend there is something very wrong with this game's asset streaming), game can sorta run, with frequent dips into the 45s... at 1080p. Forget about 2k. That's with no supersampling.

Idk how you're getting 90 fps with a 2080 and a 1800x, but I'll be happy to swap rigs for whatever fairy dust powered computer you have there.

[Lumen]

Originally posted by Ottomic:

I have a Ryzen 5 5600x, 3070, 32 GB of RAM and the game runs like absolute ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
Idk how you're getting 90 fps with a 2080 and a 1800x, but I'll be happy to swap rigs for whatever fairy dust powered computer you have there.

The game ain't even that demanding. 90% of people just set everything to max and whine about it for some months.
For the other 10% it runs kind of crippled for no real reason.
Maybe it's something with some ssd or microsoft certified drivers so deep in the system no one is able to trace it back yet really.

[tonicmole]

Originally posted by Ottomic:

I have a Ryzen 5 5600x, 3070, 32 GB of RAM and the game runs like absolute ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.

On medium-low overall settings, with textures on Medium (with the hi-res pack, otherwise textures look like smeared ♥♥♥♥, because I still contend there is something very wrong with this game's asset streaming), game can sorta run, with frequent dips into the 45s... at 1080p. Forget about 2k. That's with no supersampling.

Idk how you're getting 90 fps with a 2080 and a 1800x, but I'll be happy to swap rigs for whatever fairy dust powered computer you have there.

Without FSR and frame generation the game runs around 45 FPS for me too, but with it on, 90 FPS. It helps a lot. It also looks really good. Which is weird considering I have an Nvidia GPU. Every game runs and looks better with FSR on instead of DLSS. Doesn't make sense, but it is what it is.

[tonicmole]

Originally posted by Khergit Horse Archer:

the irony telling 4k to not use upscaling when its better to use upscaling at higher res than at lower res is pretty funni

I didn't say no upscaling, I said no DLSS. Nvidia never figured out how to actually make it work so they spent millions on marketing instead. FSR is just flat out better even with Nvidia cards.

[itsVee]

Originally posted by Lumen:

Originally posted by Ottomic:

I have a Ryzen 5 5600x, 3070, 32 GB of RAM and the game runs like absolute ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
Idk how you're getting 90 fps with a 2080 and a 1800x, but I'll be happy to swap rigs for whatever fairy dust powered computer you have there.

The game ain't even that demanding. 90% of people just set everything to max and whine about it for some months.
For the other 10% it runs kind of crippled for no real reason.
Maybe it's something with some ssd or microsoft certified drivers so deep in the system no one is able to trace it back yet really.

Aint demanding? Really? The minimum requirement of the game already demands players to run it with upscallers and frame gen. If requiring players to play with artificial frames when the game cant run on stable raw fps isnt demanding, i dont know what is

[Kiririn]

Some one tested a bunch of Ryzen CPUs with a 4090 at 1440p. Only the 9800x3d was able to maintain 60fps with a 1% low of 63. And that is with a 4090.

The OP is claiming 80-90 fps on a 1800x and RTX 2080 lol

No wonder they ignore the request for a video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wa6qoUIOCYY

[Ottomic]

I will agree that the game should not be demanding. Nothing I have seen so far (and mind you, I didn't get to the forest yet) looks demanding whatsoever, it's mostly empty scenery and relatively small spaces.

I'm desperate enough to give it another try on FSR (so far I had been running DLSS balanced capped to 45 FPS and Lossless Scaling on top to get up to 60), and I don't know how far OP has made it through the game, but I can bet even if I get decent performance on FSR at the start, once I hit the forest things are going to go sideways anyway.

[Lumen]

Originally posted by itsVee:

Aint demanding? Really? The minimum requirement of the game already demands players to run it with upscallers and frame gen. If requiring players to play with artificial frames when the game cant run on stable raw fps isnt demanding, i dont know what is

Turn enough crap on and you really need a high end rig.
Make it run without framgen and raytracig at a reasonable limited frame rate and then turn things on/off min/max see what works for you.

[tonicmole]

Originally posted by Kiririn:

Some one tested a bunch of Ryzen CPUs with a 4090 at 1440p. Only the 9800x3d was able to maintain 60fps with a 1% low of 63. And that is with a 4090.

The OP is claiming 80-90 fps on a 1800x and RTX 2080 lol

No wonder they ignore the request for a video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wa6qoUIOCYY

I'm not a Youtuber. I'm just telling you how it runs on my end. You can easily go set everything including raytracing on high, turn RSV Balanced and frame gen on, set resolution to 1080 and see what happens. I agree that the RE Engine is a son of a gun to get running smoothly. I never got over 45 FPS with Dragons Dogma 2, but this one runs great. Well, so far.

Responding to the video you posted, that seems pretty legit. It looks like less than 8 cores is getting really poor performance, which seems strange. Games generally perform better on a 5600's 6 faster cores than an 1800X's slower 8 cores. Maybe Monster Hunter is built so tightly around consoles that the closer you get to the configuration of a console the better?

[アンジェル]

Originally posted by tonicmole:

Originally posted by Khergit Horse Archer:

the irony telling 4k to not use upscaling when its better to use upscaling at higher res than at lower res is pretty funni

I didn't say no upscaling, I said no DLSS. Nvidia never figured out how to actually make it work so they spent millions on marketing instead. FSR is just flat out better even with Nvidia cards.

That statement is clever.

[Kiririn]

Not buying it.

If what you are saying it true then we would have seen it already. The game has been out for a month and there are tons of videos showcasing its bad optimization. Not a single one even remotely lends credence to your claims.

Originally posted by tonicmole:

Originally posted by Kiririn:

Some one tested a bunch of Ryzen CPUs with a 4090 at 1440p. Only the 9800x3d was able to maintain 60fps with a 1% low of 63. And that is with a 4090.

The OP is claiming 80-90 fps on a 1800x and RTX 2080 lol

No wonder they ignore the request for a video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wa6qoUIOCYY

I'm not a Youtuber. I'm just telling you how it runs on my end. You can easily go set everything including raytracing on high, turn RSV Balanced and frame gen on, set resolution to 1080 and see what happens. I agree that the RE Engine is a son of a gun to get running smoothly. I never got over 45 FPS with Dragons Dogma 2, but this one runs great. Well, so far. However, I ain't making a video. I'm too old for that.

[GamingWithSilvertail]

Originally posted by Kiririn:

Not buying it.

If what you are saying it true then we would have seen it already. The game has been out for a month and there are tons of videos showcasing its bad optimization. Not a single one even remotely lends credence to your claims.

Originally posted by tonicmole:

I'm not a Youtuber. I'm just telling you how it runs on my end. You can easily go set everything including raytracing on high, turn RSV Balanced and frame gen on, set resolution to 1080 and see what happens. I agree that the RE Engine is a son of a gun to get running smoothly. I never got over 45 FPS with Dragons Dogma 2, but this one runs great. Well, so far. However, I ain't making a video. I'm too old for that.

Videos are unlikely to happen because recording takes performance away especially on borderline setups and people arnt going to 'effort' you without pay for recording on theyr mobile phone for you for 10 minutes where you wouldnt be able to read the frametime anyway.

Nor are they going to buy a 'capture' card and a seconth PC for recording purpose just for you either.;

[アンジェル]

Originally posted by GamingWithSilvertail:

Originally posted by Kiririn:

Not buying it.

If what you are saying it true then we would have seen it already. The game has been out for a month and there are tons of videos showcasing its bad optimization. Not a single one even remotely lends credence to your claims.

Videos are unlikely to happen because recording takes performance away especially on borderline setups and people arnt going to 'effort' you without pay for recording on theyr mobile phone for you for 10 minutes where you wouldnt be able to read the frametime anyway.

Nor are they going to buy a 'capture' card and a seconth PC for recording purpose just for you either.;

Even if they make a video, there will always be people who are too stubborn and stick with their view on things rather than admitting they were wrong all along.

Not worth it for threadstarter to get involved with such.

They shared their piece of information with good faith, considering the misleading mass of information regarding optimisation, and that suffices already. The smart people will take out the correct information without further discussion ~