Is the game worth it?

[AdCazzum]

I've not bought the game yet for I'm waiting the optimization patch, however I've seen a lot of people that came from older monster hunters be disappointed with the content in this game. Should I just wait for the Dlcs at this point?

[heronumber00]

Originally posted by AdCazzum:

I've not bought the game yet for I'm waiting the optimization patch, however I've seen a lot of people that came from older monster hunters be disappointed with the content in this game. Should I just wait for the Dlcs at this point?

Worth it or not, YOU have to be the one to decide it for yourself.

Originally posted by AdCazzum:

I've seen a lot of people that came from older monster hunters be disappointed with the content in this game

Let's be real here, many "people that came from older monster hunters" always be disappointed with something in any MH game.

When Wold/Iceborne came out, many people were disappointed and complained about how it was different from the older MH titles.

When Rise/Sunbreak came out, many people were disappointed and complained about how it was different from the older MH titles. And praised World to the the better game and came back to play World.

NOW Wilds came out, well guess what...

SO AGAIN, sure some people are unhappy and unsatisfactory about Wilds.
But to be fair, some people's satisfaction is coming from being unhappy about something.
(*This is not about the complaints about performance issues, as those are completely fair. While the others might not)

[🇩🇪🦀「Eric」🐢🇩]

If you really like Monster Hunter, then avoid this game. It got extremely streamlined, to appease normies. There is nothing challenging in the game and there never will be, because every weapon has a counter or similar mechanic, to avoid attacks. And now you can even interrupt monsters at any time you want, even when they use their big attacks.

[🇩🇪🦀「Eric」🐢🇩]

Originally posted by Lunar Fang:

Originally posted by xabre2th:

kind...not as much of anything compared to world on release thu, the monster is way less,

Yes, he's right, World had 30 base monsters on release and wilds has the audacity to have 29.

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ outrageous.

You mean 27, because 2 of these monsters can only be fought once.

[KryptekLEO]

ive played both MHW iceborne MR 60ish and MH rise quite a bit and i really like this new one. combat is a lot cooler and easier with M+K for me. dont like controllers anymore

[Khergit Horse Archer]

wait a year or two ezpz

[This PC]

The good outweighs the bad into a 9/10 package for me.
Concerning the complaints, they happen at the release of every monster hunter ever, and people always pretend like it's the first time. People were losing their minds when world came out on pc, and said they'd never buy a capcom game again, and look where we are, Wilds is still peaking further than World ever has.

The irony in all of this is that World is somehow a golden standard now.
Monster hunter fans are playing Wilds, or have went back to world or rise to wait for Master Rank expansion for wilds, they aren't complaining on the forums and linking youtube videos pretending they know better.

I have played since MHFU, and I saw world's, rise's and wilds' launches closely.

[Laciel]

There will be no optimisation patch. The lead developer already mentioned in a interview how they "optimised the game for our fans on PC" and if you want more than 30 FPS just use frame generation.
I have only played a little bit before refunding. But i have been watching videos and seems like the end-game is not as good as it could be.

[This PC]

Originally posted by Laciel:

There will be no optimisation patch.

This makes sense commercially, majority of PC players are satisfied, and half of the playerbase is on console. If they make content, they cater to 100% of their playerbase, if they "optimize", whatever that means to people here, they only cater to a fraction that we can't quantify of half their playerbase.

Capcom has the numbers to make these decisions, we don't. If the game was truly unplayable, they'd fix it. :P

I am satisfied with pc performance myself. I found a comfy, solid 60 fps at 1440p native.

[Eric]

Originally posted by AdCazzum:

I've not bought the game yet for I'm waiting the optimization patch, however I've seen a lot of people that came from older monster hunters be disappointed with the content in this game. Should I just wait for the Dlcs at this point?

It is absolutly worth it, its a really good game and the performance is not amazing but also not nearly as bad as this forum will make you think it is. Bunch of 1050ti mf'ers crying.

[Dae]

Originally posted by This PC:

Originally posted by Laciel:

There will be no optimisation patch.

This makes sense commercially, majority of PC players are satisfied, and half of the playerbase is on console. If they make content, they cater to 100% of their playerbase, if they "optimize", whatever that means to people here, they only cater to a fraction that we can't quantify of half their playerbase.

Capcom has the numbers to make these decisions, we don't. If the game was truly unplayable, they'd fix it. :P

I am satisfied with pc performance myself. I found a comfy, solid 60 fps at 1440p native.

Mixed reviews @63% with the majority of positive reviews - if we ignore the nonsensical one liner "It's good!" ones - are complaining about performance. Definitely not a minority or "fraction" of the player base at all, you gaslighter.

You aren't solid 60fps either, your own videos proved that.

[This PC]

Originally posted by Eric:

It is absolutly worth it, its a really good game and the performance is not amazing but also not nearly as bad as this forum will make you think it is. Bunch of 1050ti mf'ers crying.

There's also a bunch of 5090 enjoyers asking capcom to justify their gpu purchase and blaming capcom for nvidia's poor offering. ;p

[Dae]

@OP the first response shows you that it's not worth it yet, dodge it till TU1 to see if they fix the game which they likely won't, beyond that? I'd just wait till G rank or when it goes on a deep sale.

[This PC]

Originally posted by Dae:

Originally posted by This PC:

This makes sense commercially, majority of PC players are satisfied, and half of the playerbase is on console. If they make content, they cater to 100% of their playerbase, if they "optimize", whatever that means to people here, they only cater to a fraction that we can't quantify of half their playerbase.

Capcom has the numbers to make these decisions, we don't. If the game was truly unplayable, they'd fix it. :P

I am satisfied with pc performance myself. I found a comfy, solid 60 fps at 1440p native.

Mixed reviews @63% with the majority of positive reviews - if we ignore the nonsensical one liner "It's good!" ones - are complaining about performance. Definitely not a minority or "fraction" of the player base at all, you gaslighter.

You aren't solid 60fps either, your own videos proved that.

Iceborn also has mixed reviews.
World also had mixed reviews on launch.
And yes, I run at 60 fps. :P
Your definition of 60 fps too. :P
https://youtu.be/Sly5DOTCH5k
But you're gonna move the goalpost, or lie about me again.
Didn't you guys try to brigade me with reports ? Told me the mods would deal with me, I'm still waiting on that.

[Dae]

Originally posted by This PC:

Didn't you guys try to brigade me with reports ? Told me the mods would deal with me, I'm still waiting on that.

Highlight the post, bud. Post history is right there.

[This PC]

Originally posted by Dae:

Highlight the post, bud. Post history is right there.

I'm not gonna scour through the 200 hate posts you and kiririn put down on this board everyday, you knock yourself out bud, I worked enough to meet your unreasonable standards, and the goalposts always move.

Props to you people for actually giving me the incentive to work on making the game run better, I can share that knowledge now and help people with it, bring like, positivity a bit.