Store Page
Monster Hunter Wilds
All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos News Guides Reviews

Monster Hunter Wilds

Store Page
View Stats:
Global Achievements
Defiance Mar 27 @ 2:51pm
Just one question
Someone level with me, because I've seen arguments on both sides about low-end PCs.

Win-10 22H2
Intel i7-9750H 2.60 HZ
NVIDIA Geforce RTX 2060
16 GB RAM
6 GB VRAM
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GU502

I know the benchmark is cheeks for realistic estimations, and have seen so much here-say about what can and cannot run this game...
What are my chances, realistically?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 25 comments
NeoX Mar 27 @ 2:55pm 
Sry but this will not be a decent/playable experience for you. Even if 720p all ultra low.

May i recommend you Monster Hunter World or Rice instead?
#1
Scipo0419 Mar 27 @ 2:58pm 
Originally posted by Refriendless:
Someone level with me, because I've seen arguments on both sides about low-end PCs.

Win-10 22H2
Intel i7-9750H 2.60 HZ
NVIDIA Geforce RTX 2060
16 GB RAM
6 GB VRAM
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GU502

I know the benchmark is cheeks for realistic estimations, and have seen so much here-say about what can and cannot run this game...
What are my chances, realistically?
What are your standards? I've put over 50 hours on my Steam Deck using a couple performance mods and I get ~27 FPS on average and the game looks like ♥♥♥♥. I'm obviously ok with this if it means I can play on my couch while watching TV with the missus. If you can't accept anything below 60 FPS then you're probably SOL
#2
Ruxcy Mar 27 @ 3:11pm 
Originally posted by NeoX:
Sry but this will not be a decent/playable experience for you. Even if 720p all ultra low.

May i recommend you Monster Hunter World or Rice instead?
Mmm rice.
#3
Knavenformed Mar 27 @ 3:17pm 
Originally posted by Ruxcy:
Originally posted by NeoX:
Sry but this will not be a decent/playable experience for you. Even if 720p all ultra low.

May i recommend you Monster Hunter World or Rice instead?
Mmm rice.

Malzeno: "Welcome to the Rice fields motherf~"
#4
アンジェル Mar 27 @ 3:34pm 
Originally posted by Refriendless:
Just one question
Someone level with me, because I've seen arguments on both sides about low-end PCs.

Win-10 22H2
Intel i7-9750H 2.60 HZ
NVIDIA Geforce RTX 2060
16 GB RAM
6 GB VRAM
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GU502

I know the benchmark is cheeks for realistic estimations, and have seen so much here-say about what can and cannot run this game...
What are my chances, realistically?

74,78 %

100% that you run the app

49,56% that you will experience stutters and the game's presentation is not enjoyable for you
#5
Defiance Mar 27 @ 3:49pm 
Originally posted by Scipo0419:
Originally posted by Refriendless:
Someone level with me, because I've seen arguments on both sides about low-end PCs.

Win-10 22H2
Intel i7-9750H 2.60 HZ
NVIDIA Geforce RTX 2060
16 GB RAM
6 GB VRAM
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GU502

I know the benchmark is cheeks for realistic estimations, and have seen so much here-say about what can and cannot run this game...
What are my chances, realistically?
What are your standards? I've put over 50 hours on my Steam Deck using a couple performance mods and I get ~27 FPS on average and the game looks like ♥♥♥♥. I'm obviously ok with this if it means I can play on my couch while watching TV with the missus. If you can't accept anything below 60 FPS then you're probably SOL

I can do 30 at a minimum or it probably won't sit right; or look so, on my TV.
#6
Soji Mar 27 @ 3:49pm 
6gb of vram is pretty high chance you'll run into the polygon monsters you've probably seen online posted, older CPU and GPU too. It'll probably run but the experience will not be great. The recommended specs tab for this game is about as inaccurate as the benchmark is too, realistically if you have anything below a 30 series with a cpu that isn't something like a 12700k, it'll run poorly. I use those number specifically because with a 3070rtx and that cpu I wasn't able to have a stable 60 even on low settings. You are reliant completely on frame gen to smooth out the experience but frame gen on games that aren't at least 60 fps natively....well it just doensn't feel or look good tbh.
#7
Defiance Mar 27 @ 3:49pm 
Originally posted by NeoX:
Sry but this will not be a decent/playable experience for you. Even if 720p all ultra low.

May i recommend you Monster Hunter World or Rice instead?
TV only displays 1080p, okay.
#8
Defiance Mar 27 @ 3:51pm 
Originally posted by Soji:
6gb of vram is pretty high chance you'll run into the polygon monsters you've probably seen online posted, older CPU and GPU too. It'll probably run but the experience will not be great. The recommended specs tab for this game is about as inaccurate as the benchmark is too, realistically if you have anything below a 30 series with a cpu that isn't something like a 12700k, it'll run poorly. I use those number specifically because with a 3070rtx and that cpu I wasn't able to have a stable 60 even on low settings. You are reliant completely on frame gen to smooth out the experience but frame gen on games that aren't at least 60 fps natively....well it just doensn't feel or look good tbh.

Haven't seen any screenshots, just read about Texture/mesh artifacts that happen frequently even for some machines greater than mine.
Last edited by Defiance; Mar 27 @ 3:51pm
#9
Gaidax Mar 27 @ 3:54pm 
Originally posted by Refriendless:
Someone level with me, because I've seen arguments on both sides about low-end PCs.

Win-10 22H2
Intel i7-9750H 2.60 HZ
NVIDIA Geforce RTX 2060
16 GB RAM
6 GB VRAM
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GU502

I know the benchmark is cheeks for realistic estimations, and have seen so much here-say about what can and cannot run this game...
What are my chances, realistically?

Might as well not bother with those specs.

For more details - run benchmark and reduce result FPS by 20 and then maybe it will be close to what you will actually get ingame.
#10
Lavis Mar 27 @ 3:56pm 
I'm not hopeful you'd be able to run it with those specs and if you somehow can - it won't look very good. It looks simulated and processed enough as-is.
#11
NeoX Mar 27 @ 3:57pm 
Originally posted by Ruxcy:
Originally posted by NeoX:
Sry but this will not be a decent/playable experience for you. Even if 720p all ultra low.

May i recommend you Monster Hunter World or Rice instead?
Mmm rice.


Originally posted by Knavenformed:
Originally posted by Ruxcy:
Mmm rice.

Malzeno: "Welcome to the Rice fields motherf~"

Yeah ok typo on my end, i admit it xD

Originally posted by Refriendless:
Originally posted by NeoX:
Sry but this will not be a decent/playable experience for you. Even if 720p all ultra low.

May i recommend you Monster Hunter World or Rice instead?
TV only displays 1080p, okay.

You can try the Benchmark tool this of game offers. You can play around a little and see if you manage to get anything acceptable out for you.

You can find it on the steam shops page of this game.

But again, with these specs, i do not see much hope for you.
Last edited by NeoX; Mar 27 @ 3:59pm
#12
アンジェル Mar 27 @ 4:03pm 
Originally posted by Refriendless:
Originally posted by Soji:
6gb of vram is pretty high chance you'll run into the polygon monsters you've probably seen online posted, older CPU and GPU too. It'll probably run but the experience will not be great. The recommended specs tab for this game is about as inaccurate as the benchmark is too, realistically if you have anything below a 30 series with a cpu that isn't something like a 12700k, it'll run poorly. I use those number specifically because with a 3070rtx and that cpu I wasn't able to have a stable 60 even on low settings. You are reliant completely on frame gen to smooth out the experience but frame gen on games that aren't at least 60 fps natively....well it just doensn't feel or look good tbh.

Haven't seen any screenshots, just read about Texture/mesh artifacts that happen frequently even for some machines greater than mine.

Try the benchmark. The game runs better than the benchmark. But pay attention to what is not cutscene.
#13
Scipo0419 Mar 27 @ 6:00pm 
Originally posted by Refriendless:
Originally posted by Scipo0419:
What are your standards? I've put over 50 hours on my Steam Deck using a couple performance mods and I get ~27 FPS on average and the game looks like ♥♥♥♥. I'm obviously ok with this if it means I can play on my couch while watching TV with the missus. If you can't accept anything below 60 FPS then you're probably SOL

I can do 30 at a minimum or it probably won't sit right; or look so, on my TV.
Ok, then with some performance mods to do things like disable wind simulations and post-processing effects + some config tweaks you should be able to reach 30 pretty consistently. The VRAM hurts you the most, the Steam Deck shares its VRAM with System RAM and I can still play though
#14
Defiance Mar 27 @ 6:05pm 
Originally posted by アンジェル:
Originally posted by Refriendless:

Haven't seen any screenshots, just read about Texture/mesh artifacts that happen frequently even for some machines greater than mine.

Try the benchmark. The game runs better than the benchmark. But pay attention to what is not cutscene.

Yeah I did use the Benchmark several times, but a lot of different opinions on its' accuracy. I also paid more attention to gameplay than cutscenes, because cutscenes in most games are smoother than actual gameplay. Frames dip noticeably on the very entity rich scene with wheat/grass, and also tank in that cave area village place. But everywhere else seem a bit smoother. 32 - 45 FPS
#15
< >
Showing 1-15 of 25 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Monster Hunter Wilds > General Discussions > Topic Details
Date Posted: Mar 27 @ 2:51pm
Posts: 25

Discussions Rules and Guidelines