almost a month why no performance patch?

[Ya Mada]

Title did Capcom at least respond to that sh1tty performance on PC? I mean I would be happy if they at least did something but it seems like the game is going to stay like that... I tried to refund this sh1t but couldn't because I spend 2h alone in the character creator so I'm kinda... Waiting I'm not even asking for much but bruh make the game overall run like 10~20% better
They didn't care much about dragons dogma 2 but even there they did something on the performance.

[Wren]

World was worse, game was unplayable to most for weeks, and thunder weapons were unusable because the particle effects tanked your framerates every hit

Ports are almost always awful at launch. Also doesn't help that the AAA scene is now on the "AI upscaling" bandwagon that makes everything look like garbage and gives them an out to release a poorly optimized game and say "oh well, they can use frame gen" despite the tech being a scam that nobody asked for or needed

[Ya Mada]

Originally posted by Wren:

World was worse, game was unplayable to most for weeks, and thunder weapons were unusable because the particle effects tanked your framerates every hit

Ports are almost always awful at launch. Also doesn't help that the AAA scene is now on the "AI upscaling" bandwagon that makes everything look like garbage and gives them an out to release a poorly optimized game and say "oh well, they can use frame gen" despite the tech being a scam that nobody asked for or needed

World can't be worse than wilds now because:the minimum requirement for 60 fps was actually the minimum requirement.
World also was playable even though it had flaws, wilds is only playable with a 5000$ PC or frame gen.
Trust me I played world back then on a 1060 ti and we're fine, now my 3060 is dying when I play wilds. Big difference in my opinion
Gotta correct myself A drastical difference in how much performance is needed but only a very small difference in how it ended up looking. Me and a lot of ppl think world was prettier even though there is a lot in wilds that in detail looks by far better but... I think they still did a bad job if half the community thinks it's a downgrade from world

[アンジェル]

There was a performance patch which actually increased performance significantly.

[Diijkstra]

their announcement to update your drivers etc proves that they can't fix the performance right away. their engine is a garbanzo. tho I notice i get less crash.

[Ya Mada]

Originally posted by アンジェル:

There was a performance patch which actually increased performance significantly.

You sure? When? Because I'm playing this game since day 1 and never got a update pop up or anything.

[Wren]

Originally posted by Ya Mada:

Originally posted by Wren:

World was worse, game was unplayable to most for weeks, and thunder weapons were unusable because the particle effects tanked your framerates every hit

Ports are almost always awful at launch. Also doesn't help that the AAA scene is now on the "AI upscaling" bandwagon that makes everything look like garbage and gives them an out to release a poorly optimized game and say "oh well, they can use frame gen" despite the tech being a scam that nobody asked for or needed

World can't be worse than wilds now because:the minimum requirement for 60 fps was actually the minimum requirement.
World also was playable even though it had flaws, wilds is only playable with a 5000$ PC or frame gen.
Trust me I played world back then on a 1060 ti and we're fine, now my 3060 is dying when I play wilds. Big difference in my opinion
Gotta correct myself A drastical difference in how much performance is needed but only a very small difference in how it ended up looking. Me and a lot of ppl think world was prettier even though there is a lot in wilds that in detail looks by far better but... I think they still did a bad job if half the community thinks it's a downgrade from world

my PC is less than half that price and I never drop below 60fps with no frame gen on high settings. The performance issues are vastly overstated. My specs+settings are in my profile

i also hate the idea that every game needs to be graphically superior to the last, though. It's meaningless, unsustainable capitalist BS. video games never needed to be more graphically advanced than World to begin with

[MelvinSmiley]

I was dumb enough to argue that Capcom will treat this game better than DD2 because it's more important for them and more ressources and a larger team should be available for Wilds. But after the disastrous launch I expect the worst.

Probably Wilds will get the DD2 treatment which means that we will get sth. like a measly 10 fps boost after 1 year of waiting. And maybe they will implement all the fixes modders already done for this game if we are lucky.

[Dae]

Theres no patch because they can't fix RE Engine being used outside of what it was designed for. Dragons Dogma 2 is concrete proof of this.

Originally posted by Wren:

World was worse

False.

[Melancholy Hill]

would have to assume any fixes they're going to make in regards to performance will come with title update 1, it's a convenient place to dump everything all at once, even if it technically would have been better for them to release fixes earlier. doesn't help that nobody can seem to agree on the severity of the performance issues and arguments range from "the game is literally unplayable" to "the game runs perfectly". world's pc launch was messy as well, i don't recall rise being this way but rise was also a lot simpler visually (which is arguably for the better).

[Wren]

Originally posted by Dae:

Theres no patch because they can't fix RE Engine being used outside of what it was designed for. Dragons Dogma 2 is concrete proof of this.

Originally posted by Wren:

World was worse

False.

lol

[Ya Mada]

Originally posted by Wren:

Originally posted by Ya Mada:

World can't be worse than wilds now because:the minimum requirement for 60 fps was actually the minimum requirement.
World also was playable even though it had flaws, wilds is only playable with a 5000$ PC or frame gen.
Trust me I played world back then on a 1060 ti and we're fine, now my 3060 is dying when I play wilds. Big difference in my opinion
Gotta correct myself A drastical difference in how much performance is needed but only a very small difference in how it ended up looking. Me and a lot of ppl think world was prettier even though there is a lot in wilds that in detail looks by far better but... I think they still did a bad job if half the community thinks it's a downgrade from world

my PC is less than half that price and I never drop below 60fps with no frame gen on high settings. The performance issues are vastly overstated. My specs+settings are in my profile

i also hate the idea that every game needs to be graphically superior to the last, though. It's meaningless, unsustainable capitalist BS. video games never needed to be more graphically advanced than World to begin with

Overstated?
I'm running a 3060 12gb
32gb ram
Ryzen 9800x
And I literally can't get this game to run at 60 fps.
know what's funny? Most in-game settings also don't change sh1t to me the difference between everything max&nativ&everything low&dlss performance difference = 10 fps
M.2 WD black

And I know I repeat myself but... I played world on a 1060 ti bruh

[Darth_Angeal]

Originally posted by Diijkstra:

their announcement to update your drivers etc proves that they can't fix the performance right away. their engine is a garbanzo. tho I notice i get less crash.

It´s not always the game you know?
As far as i´ve read about recent issues, poeple mostly have AMD setups. Stuff from a company where you can wait a long time for better drivers and which has issues with several other games / engines aswell. (FF14 AMD crashes for example for YEARS)

Also poeple still refuse to use Framegen for whatever reason. Not to mention that the performance sucks if they can´t get stable 120fps on 4k and so on... and how about those with 5y+ old rigs? RTX20 / 30 have already been crap on release and not any better than a GTX1080ti.

The "issue" is clearly exxegerated to some point.

[Kiririn]

Originally posted by Wren:

World was worse, game was unplayable to most for weeks, and thunder weapons were unusable because the particle effects tanked your framerates every hit

Not true. World was not great but it wasn't this bad.

[Ya Mada]

Originally posted by Darth_Angeal:

Originally posted by Diijkstra:

their announcement to update your drivers etc proves that they can't fix the performance right away. their engine is a garbanzo. tho I notice i get less crash.

It´s not always the game you know?
As far as i´ve read about recent issues, poeple mostly have AMD setups. Stuff from a company where you can wait a long time for better drivers and which has issues with several other games / engines aswell. (FF14 AMD crashes for example for YEARS)

Also poeple still refuse to use Framegen for whatever reason. Not to mention that the performance sucks if they can´t get stable 120fps on 4k and so on... and how about those with 5y+ old rigs? RTX20 / 30 have already been crap on release and not any better than a GTX1080ti.

The "issue" is clearly exxegerated to some point.

Dunno about you but my outdated 3060 till this day performs better than the 2070 super and I'm fine with that. And I'm normally getting 100+ fps on most new games.

You can call my rigs old all day long but they ain't the problem here.

[Wren]

Originally posted by Darth_Angeal:

Also poeple still refuse to use Framegen for whatever reason.

looks like garbage, is unnecessary, and sets an awful precedent for the AAA market to be able to release wildly unoptimized games and say "oh just use upscaling tee-hee"

AI bull***t shouldn't exist in any capacity beyond stuff like medical diagnostic algorithms. It's worthless bloat that makes everything worse at the cost of the end user experience