This or Wild Hearts ?

[LemanRuss2000]

At least Wild Hearts runs better

[Миша]

Lol 🤡

[MrSoul]

Never heard of that before, but after a quick glance I'll say that MH games in general have light years better monster and world design.

If never played World, maybe check that out, should run better on more hardware than Wilds.

[Azinar Elyrum]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย MrSoul:

Never heard of that before, but after a quick glance I'll say that MH games in general have light years better monster and world design.

If never played World, maybe check that out, should run better on more hardware than Wilds.

From friends that have played it, its apparently worse in performance, and EA devs legit abandoned it within 6 months of release (it wont get ANY new content of any kind)

[kl250d]

Wild hears also apparently had worse launch performance than wilds did. Its disappointing it would have been cool to have more monster hunting games out there

[Wild]

I wouldn't recommend a monster hunter clone even to my worst enemy.

[Azinar Elyrum]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย kl250d:

Wild hears also apparently had worse launch performance than wilds did. Its disappointing it would have been cool to have more monster hunting games out there

Yeah.. wild hearts (just like dauntless) sadly fell under horrible devs, lots of potential but they kinda shot themself in the foot. in wilds i usually get at minimum 50 FPS, i tried wild hearts once and i could only get like 40 with constant staggers down to 15

[Calandir]

Wild Hearts, at least it's unique. And more difficult. You will have more fun there.

[Scipo0419]

Wild Hearts is very fun, but even though I can get 30 FPS in both games, Wild Hearts stutters like a mofo where MH:Wilds doesn't. I could probably try some performance mods for Wild Hearts like I'm using for MH:Wilds...

[Kasa]

As some one who has actually played wilds hearts I can say it was a lot of fun and pretty cool!

It's a shame that it's pretty much dead community wise. I'd say if you want to play with other people and have never played a monster hunter before this.

If you don't care about playing with other people and have already played a bunch of monster hunter, Wilds hearts.

[Flash]

If I had to choose whether to play MHW or Wild Hearts for all eternity, I'd probably pick staring at paint drying on a wall.

[Kiririn]

IGN felt Wild Hearts was more engaging and kept them hooked longer than Wilds, for what it's worth.

Edit: Wild Hearts is like 10 bucks on Steam at the moment, or it was yesterday.

[I]

Wild hearts until MH Wilds gets Master rank expansion, which will be next year.

[Black Fox]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Flash:

If I had to choose whether to play MHW or Wild Hearts for all eternity, I'd probably pick staring at paint drying on a wall.

Yes, wilds is the worst mh in a long time

[btanis20]

From someone that got 100% achievements in Wild Hearts, I can vouch that it's a fun game in its own right. (Even though it still stutters, regardless of your hardware.)

Although I wish they didn't go with EA to publish the game, at least they're self-publishing the Switch 2 port and likely still own the IP.

[Black Fox]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย btanis20:

From someone that got 100% achievements in Wild Hearts, I can vouch that it's a fun game in its own right. (Even though it still stutters, regardless of your hardware.)

Although I wish they didn't go with EA to publish the game, at least they're self-publishing the Switch 2 port and likely still own the IP.

The switch port will have changes such like now being able to have 4 player hunts instead of 3, i hope it adds more content and bring those on pc