to people who bought this game at full price

[-Euthanasia Quietus]

what its feel to be early access playtesting this dog performance? also mixed review i guess 5090 isnt enough need 6090 which would be nice yeah

[Sticky White Stuff]

I didn't buy it at full price.
And i ain't going to pretend the game isn't full of problems, and that we should tolerate Upscaling + FrameGen + RayTracing + NVME +70/80€ as a new standard.

But on a Ryzen 5600X + RX 6600 XT, 16GB DDR4 RAM and SSD, the game runs at 80 FPS on Highest (No Dips), with FSR 3.1 on Quality + FrameGen on 1080p.
FrameGen would be a big problem if it weren't flawless here. No Input Latency, No Ghosting, No Choppy Movement, No Interpolation.
Fake frames work as real frames for once. Compare that to the beta where FrameGen was horrible, with horrible ghosting issues.

World launched in a worse state, and not even a 1080 TI and the best CPU couldn't run it maxed out at 60 FPS at the time. The Average GPU at the time would burn and crash when particle effects would shower the screen and drop to 15 FPS.
So not much has changed. People think World runs great today, but they are actually just bruteforcing the performance, so it runs great because they have a better rig. They don't use GPUs and CPUs from 2016-2018.

Gameplay? Superb. Technical level? Crap. So that in conclusion actually makes it a great game.

Also, nice bait.

[Torkel]

I'm playing on my dogass pc with a I7 4770 and a nvidia 2070. in doesn't feel fantastic. but I do have a 60 fps capped with frame gen and it's playable.

if you get less than 60 fps on a 40 or 50 series then the problem is not what you think it might be.

I repeat, I have a half dead 4th gen CPU and a card that's not even mentionned in benchmarks anymore and it's playable.

just stop expecting to reach 144 fps in 4K on a game that came out a week ago on a ♥♥♥♥ engine. yes, we should have no performance issue at launch on AAA games, I agree. but if the last 10 years on gaming you didn't manage to indentifie the pattern that's kinda on you.

[*Gen*HeroCrusher]

OP... tell us you have a toaster without telling us you have a toaster.

[Sticky White Stuff]

Originally posted by *Gen*HeroCrusher:

OP... tell us you have a toaster without telling us you have a toaster.

I have a microwave and it plays fine. See above.
The post is a clear bait, but the discussions are at least not.

However no one can deny that optimization of the game is horrible. Using Lowest versus Highest nets 10% Performance in certain areas only. So why even bother using Low settings.

[Urban Anthem]

im on a 4070, my settings are on ultra and i float between 90-120 fps throughout the game. I have crashed twice in loading screens and other then that the game runs absolutely fine 100% of the time. I know nothing about pc's and how to optimize them so i didnt do anything fancy to get it to run well.

[Sevariel]

Some lag and crashes here and there but I'm having a blast with my squad and it looks amazing. Hope it gets a lot of love and support to keep it goin.

[Kiririn]

Originally posted by Sticky White Stuff:

I didn't buy it at full price.

Any amount is too much in it's current state. Why pay to be a beta tester?

[Bassium]

Originally posted by Kiririn:

Originally posted by Sticky White Stuff:

I didn't buy it at full price.

Any amount is too much in it's current state. Why pay to be a beta tester?

Moving goal posts. Makes you look weak.

[Sticky White Stuff]

Originally posted by Kiririn:

Originally posted by Sticky White Stuff:

I didn't buy it at full price.

Any amount is too much in it's current state. Why pay to be a beta tester?

Tester for what? What exactly am i testing? Do they gather actual data from my feedback to improve upon the game on my toaster? I don't think so.

I bought the game to play it, and i play it all day long without zero issues maxed out on my microwave machine. If i didn't pay 48€ for the game, i would have bought it at full price, just like i buy every other game on either PC or PS5, pre-orders included.

And speaking of testing. I do in fact pay actual money for Early Access and Patreon/KickStarter games to *test* them, because money isn't an issue for me and i want everything now, without any delay.

[Kiririn]

Originally posted by Bassium:

Originally posted by Kiririn:

Any amount is too much in it's current state. Why pay to be a beta tester?

Moving goal posts. Makes you look weak.

I wasn't the one who made the post, but I do thank you for your sacrifice.

[Kiririn]

Originally posted by Sticky White Stuff:

Originally posted by Kiririn:

Any amount is too much in it's current state. Why pay to be a beta tester?

Tester for what? What exactly am i testing? Do they gather actual data from my feedback to improve upon the game on my toaster? I don't think so.

They do. They take telemetry from your computer. You guys are working hard. I appreciate it.

[VIC1OUSTHREAT]

they are fans of monster hunter and have been waiting years for this game bozo.

[Sticky White Stuff]

Originally posted by Kiririn:

Originally posted by Sticky White Stuff:

Tester for what? What exactly am i testing? Do they gather actual data from my feedback to improve upon the game on my toaster? I don't think so.

They do.

Really now? Will they boost the performance by +100 FPS on my RX 6600 XT while i am done with the game?

[Memento Vivere]

4070 laptop, 60+ fps without framegen, 80+ with it. But yes, you can try 6090

Benchmark: https://imgur.com/a/65rsCDN

[Kiririn]

Originally posted by Sticky White Stuff:

Originally posted by Kiririn:

They do.

Really now? Will they boost the performance by +100 FPS on my RX 6600 XT while i am done with the game?

All I know is that the patient gamers will get a much better product for 50% off. I am just saying thank you.