whats with the reviews?

[Zakoos]

what are they complaining about


EDIT: based on the replies people seem to be complaining about annoying bugs/crashes, immersion breaking bugs, and performance issues for some people, ALSO they fooled someone with their benchmark tool apparently

[ItsJustT0m]

got a 9700x and a 2070 (4070 arrives today or tomorow) and can only run it at Lowest + DLSS Ultra Performance barely Hitting 60 fps Sometime

[Zogtar]

Originally posted by Noppi:

A minority who think they can do something with 5 year old hardware, there was a free benchmark for that but the lazy ones were punished and now think they should start an outcry with a negative review.

Just children.

Having fun with the game, but the issues are very real. The benchmark tool is also wildly inaccurate, as discussed.

Dismiss and call us children though... we'll dEfInItElY trust you to listen to our problems.

[DerpTron]

Originally posted by Zogtar:

Originally posted by Noppi:

A minority who think they can do something with 5 year old hardware, there was a free benchmark for that but the lazy ones were punished and now think they should start an outcry with a negative review.

Just children.

Having fun with the game, but the issues are very real. The benchmark tool is also wildly inaccurate, as discussed.

Dismiss and call us children though... we'll dEfInItElY trust you to listen to our problems.

yea, same, having a blast. I'm lucky to have a rig to run it well. But man the defence of the terrible performance issues is . . . WILD :D

[Zakoos]

Originally posted by Zogtar:

Originally posted by Noppi:

A minority who think they can do something with 5 year old hardware, there was a free benchmark for that but the lazy ones were punished and now think they should start an outcry with a negative review.

Just children.

Having fun with the game, but the issues are very real. The benchmark tool is also wildly inaccurate, as discussed.

Dismiss and call us children though... we'll dEfInItElY trust you to listen to our problems.

if the issues you're having are bug related/crashes etc then sure but if it's fps then im sorry bro but you can expect that to happen with a 2070 running it

[Zogtar]

Originally posted by zakoo:

Originally posted by Zogtar:

Having fun with the game, but the issues are very real. The benchmark tool is also wildly inaccurate, as discussed.

Dismiss and call us children though... we'll dEfInItElY trust you to listen to our problems.

if the issues you're having are bug related/crashes etc then sure but if it's fps then im sorry bro but you can expect that to happen with a 2070 running it

The problem is that the benchmark tool had me running at consistent 60 fps (*52 was off) and recommended me to play on "high" settings. Which... naw, I went medium and everything is fuzzy.

I'm okay with it, there will be patches, and things'll improve like they did with World... but why have a benchmark tool if it doesn't even function properly?

[Ki11s0n3]

Originally posted by PaulKrawitz:

Originally posted by Ki11s0n3:

The game has major Performance and Graphical issues. Doesn't matter how good of a machine you have. It's a poorly optimized mess on PC and people are mad about it because the lazy devs have known about these issues since we had the original beta if not before that.

Anyone saying they aren't having problems is lying and looking for attention.

Or... they simply heve better hardware, or a better optimised system...

It's not always them seeking attention.

When the majority of the player base has issues then it's the game. They may have better performance than some of us, but the game is not running perfectly like it should and it's been proven. No one is not having issues. They just may have slightly better performance than some of us.

[Zakoos]

Originally posted by Zogtar:

Originally posted by zakoo:

if the issues you're having are bug related/crashes etc then sure but if it's fps then im sorry bro but you can expect that to happen with a 2070 running it

The problem is that the benchmark tool had me running at consistent 60 fps and recommended me to play on "high" settings. Which... naw, I went medium and everything is fuzzy.

I'm okay with it, there will be patches, and things'll improve like they did with World... but why have a benchmark tool if it doesn't even function properly?

so they scammed you with their benchmark tool and gave you false hope for the game, i can understand why you wouldn't recommend it, hope they improve the performance in the future to make up for that BUT they're capcom so idk

['JJ]

most people that play this game and say they dont have any performance problems are stupid. i can tell you why easily.
1. they most likely play on 1080p. 1080p is NOTHING. your phone can play games on that.
2. on top of that they have at least fsr/dlss on and in most cases also framegen.
3. having 60-90fps with dlss and or framegen on, is a joke.
a 980 graphics card can run games at 1080p 60fps. even newer games.
4. it is factually proven, by many many benchmarks that this game performs poorly and has massive frametime issues which lead to stutter and fps drops.
5. 5 year old graphics card dont matter. you can play cyberpunk on one at 1080p with high settings. hell, even your ps5 can. your ps4 can at some games.
why can i play cyberpunk which looks WAY better and has way more demanding stuff in it (at least gpu wise , the monsters get computed by the cpu, that dont cause the performance issues) with more fps than i can play wilds? it does not make sense.
6. the first level, the desert already has abysmal performace and theres not even trees to render..no foliage etc..,
7. again. 5 year old graphics card are great cards, especially since in 5 years only 2 generations come out you dummies.. and one of them is always the newest one, which games arent developed on or for.. so which makes the one they are developed for usually 2-3 or more years old. since development takes around up to 5 years for a game


if you actually play on 1080p then you are the dumb one. cause wtf man. buy a new gpu every generation? i mean thats what u said, cos u said 5 years is too old... and u still play at 1080p with a new card ? why? no sense..

also. u can check benchmarks and a 4090 just gets 100fps with dlss... and im not talking bout 4k resolution here...
cyberpunk gets over triple that .. while looking better
so a 2000dollar graphics card gets u 100fps and u actually think there is no problem?
are u guys really that fricking dumb?
its pathetic. you just ignore every factual test, benchmark, report that came out?
its obvious you guys only know how gpu is spelled but nothing more about it

[*Gen*HeroCrusher]

Its the toaster army flexing it's enormous muscles.

[Zakoos]

Originally posted by 'JJ:

most people that play this game and say they dont have any performance problems are stupid. i can tell you why easily.
1. they most likely play on 1080p. 1080p is NOTHING. your phone can play games on that.
2. on top of that they have at least fsr/dlss on and in most cases also framegen.
3. having 60-90fps with dlss and or framegen on, is a joke.
a 980 graphics card can run games at 1080p 60fps. even newer games.
4. it is factually proven, by many many benchmarks that this game performs poorly and has massive frametime issues which lead to stutter and fps drops.
5. 5 year old graphics card dont matter. you can play cyberpunk on one at 1080p with high settings. hell, even your ps5 can. your ps4 can at some games.
why can i play cyberpunk which looks WAY better and has way more demanding stuff in it (at least gpu wise , the monsters get computed by the cpu, that dont cause the performance issues) with more fps than i can play wilds? it does not make sense.
6. the first level, the desert already has abysmal performace and theres not even trees to render..no foliage etc..,
7. again. 5 year old graphics card are great cards, especially since in 5 years only 2 generations come out you dummies.. and one of them is always the newest one, which games arent developed on or for.. so which makes the one they are developed for usually 2-3 or more years old. since development takes around up to 5 years for a game


if you actually play on 1080p then you are the dumb one. cause wtf man. buy a new gpu every generation? i mean thats what u said, cos u said 5 years is too old... and u still play at 1080p with a new card ? why? no sense..

also. u can check benchmarks and a 4090 just gets 100fps with dlss... and im not talking bout 4k resolution here...
cyberpunk gets over triple that .. while looking better
so a 2000dollar graphics card gets u 100fps and u actually think there is no problem?
are u guys really that fricking dumb?
its pathetic. you just ignore every factual test, benchmark, report that came out?
its obvious you guys only know how gpu is spelled but nothing more about it

fair points but mind telling me who exactly is this person that ignored every factual test etc etc?

[Zogtar]

Originally posted by zakoo:

Originally posted by Zogtar:

The problem is that the benchmark tool had me running at consistent 60 fps and recommended me to play on "high" settings. Which... naw, I went medium and everything is fuzzy.

I'm okay with it, there will be patches, and things'll improve like they did with World... but why have a benchmark tool if it doesn't even function properly?

so they scammed you with their benchmark tool and gave you false hope for the game, i can understand why you wouldn't recommend it, hope they improve the performance in the future to make up for that BUT they're capcom so idk

I still recommend the game, don't get me wrong. I have some hope/faith going off of previous installments.

Being said, I wouldn't blame anyone for waiting for a sale.

[Zakoos]

Originally posted by Zogtar:

Originally posted by zakoo:

so they scammed you with their benchmark tool and gave you false hope for the game, i can understand why you wouldn't recommend it, hope they improve the performance in the future to make up for that BUT they're capcom so idk

I still recommend the game, don't get me wrong. I have some hope/faith going off of previous installments.

Being said, I wouldn't blame anyone for waiting for a sale.

i wouldn't put TOO much hope on capcom tbh lmao but hey good luck, i have too many unfinished games atm so i can't test it out rn myself unfortunately

['JJ]

Originally posted by RandomRedMage:

My PC is 5 years old and runs the game mostly fine, I had a few stutters in cut scenes during my play through of the main story and a few audio loading delayed issues. But nothing that made the game unplayable. (and likely all related to running the game off of an external SSD lol)

There is a typo in the config.ini file of the game though, so that's kind of hilarious. Just fixed it, and going to see if that improves the performance any? Probably wont, but generally gameplay feels fine. 1440p Ultra-Widescreen. Intel i9-9900KF paired with an Nvidia RTX2080 Super. Let the game auto set the settings for me, so no clue what preset it chose, looked fine to me.

i have 1440p aswell. i have a 3070 a 7800x3d 64gb ram
everyone of those OCd
and i get 50fps max. (dlss on fg off)

so how is ur performance better? it cant. stop making excuses for incompetent devs.
every game released in the last 10 years performed better. and every game released in the last 5 , looked better.

[Lunaire]

Originally posted by GamingWithSilvertail:

Originally posted by Ki11s0n3:

The game has major Performance and Graphical issues. Doesn't matter how good of a machine you have. It's a poorly optimized mess on PC and people are mad about it because the lazy devs have known about these issues since we had the original beta if not before that.

Anyone saying they aren't having problems is lying and looking for attention.

I have had litterally no problem apart from 2 crashes so far.... XD

That's the ting: I'm on a 3060 and the game runs very well until at some point after either 5mn or 2 hours, it crashes.
That's several things: bad code, bad optimization on top of bad code and massive memory leaks.
Some people suspect the vertices flying all over the place even on 5080's to be the culprits for the memory leaks by the way.
TLDR: Your game will end up crashing if you let it on. It is not a matter of if but a matter of when.

P.S.: there are typos in the config files. That tells you about the quality of the code.

[Nin]

Originally posted by Heavens Devil:

3 camps:

Can't start the game

Performance sucks

Disappointing/Easy/Short

MHWorld and Rise were just as easy/short at launch too...the difficulty ramps up with TU when they release those.